I use SQLYog. I have the enterprise version, for which a 30 day free
trial is available.
And read this first:
http://dev.mysql.com/tech-resources/articles/migrating-from-microsoft.html
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox
wrote:
>
> trying to move a bunch of tables from mssql to
trying to move a bunch of tables from mssql to mysql. Anyone know of a
converter that easy and preferable cheap or free?
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know
on the House of Fusio
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Judah McA wrote:
>
>
> Solar minimalists be damned (I'm looking at you Robert), it was still
> hotter than the previous decade which was hotter than the decade
> before, etc.
In the movie 2012, everyone dies when a solar maximum shoots hot neutrinos
into the pla
Did you guys even read the article:
'The U.S. space agency's data also revealed that 2009 was the second
warmest year since temperature records began in 1880, and only
narrowly cooler than 2005, the warmest year ever'
I was using my '130 years' based on that paragraph. I doubt we have
similar te
What a dishonorable man.
I always thought he had more character than to purposefully lie and be
forsworn.
Ah, my illusions shattered.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/22/AR2010012202602.html?hpid=topnews
FBI records show broadcaster Paul Harvey had deep ties to J. E
Obama promised he wasn't going to use PAC money, union money and only
use government money.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> Obama doesn't control the Supreme Court. Now, if I can "persuade" a
> couple of justices to "retire" then perhaps we might get somewhere...
>
> J
If you include the British Admiralty records, then they go back to the
late 1600's, ship captains were supposed to record temperatures etc at
least once a day.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> We have data going back more than 130 years. We don't have detailed
> data goi
I for one dream of a perfect world. One where MD doesn't feel he has to put
disclaimers on his comments.
** The opinions expressed in the preceeding statement are those of the
auther and do not neccessarily reflect those of House of Fusion, it's
sponsors or affiliates.
~
We have data going back more than 130 years. We don't have detailed
data going back farther than that. But even if you include things like
ice core samples, carbon concentrations (the absorption of various
chemicals differs based on temperature) and such, the headline would
still be incorrect. The
As I said before, I don't think that PACs ought to be able to
contribute directly to politicians either. If we keep the existing
prohibition against campaigns coordinating campaigns with PACs and
allow PACs to only make independent expenditures, I'm fine with that.
You want to run ads saying tha
eh he kept a lot of them. I am REALLY disappointed with the whole Wall
Street debacle though. We'll see what he does not but I feel like it's
almost too little too late
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Maureen wrote:
>
> That's what happens when you don't keep your promises. In spite of
> all
Obama doesn't control the Supreme Court. Now, if I can "persuade" a
couple of justices to "retire" then perhaps we might get somewhere...
Judah
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> But Obama promised...
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2
I don't think data only goes back 130 years. I myself did a study at UNM of
housing patterns following droughts in the 9th century using
dendrochronological data. Ergo, the data is there, unless you want to
dismiss it as not really data.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:13 PM, morgan l wrote:
>
> Sens
I think that they feel that Saudi run mosques in America are just not
teaching Islam correctly and want to expose the truth as shown in the
Muslim Brotherhood philosophy. Like there's a big difference.
Note: I'm comparing the supremest brand of Islam taught by Saudi run
mosques with the supremest
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
> The question would be WHY do they want to go to America??
> One is in Switzerland (not a bad place to live) why do they want to
> travel to the States?
>
> They have family there? Want to go to Vegas?
> What?
>
>
Make money, everyone has a dream!
The question would be WHY do they want to go to America??
One is in Switzerland (not a bad place to live) why do they want to
travel to the States?
They have family there? Want to go to Vegas?
What?
2010/1/22 Michael Dinowitz :
>
> I know that the State Department has never really been looking o
I am sure I will enjoy it when it comes ;P hopefully not when I am on the
Bay Bridge or something
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Maureen wrote:
>
> You're right, for the most part. I've been through earthquakes,
> hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, mudslides and fires. I'll take the
> quakes.
I read James Hansen and LMAO
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 4:13 PM, morgan l wrote:
>
> Sensationalist headlines have been around as long as newspapers have been
> printed. Nothing new there.
>
> The article clearly states how far back the data being analyzed goes, but
> opponents of "global warming"
Sensationalist headlines have been around as long as newspapers have been
printed. Nothing new there.
The article clearly states how far back the data being analyzed goes, but
opponents of "global warming" won't even read that much of it, and
supporters don't care.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 3:01 P
core samples of ice from Antarctica?
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
>
> http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/science/01/22/nasa.warmest.decade.data/index.html
>
> How the last decade can be declared 'the warmest ever on Earth' when
> we only have data dating back 130 years?
>
> T
http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/science/01/22/nasa.warmest.decade.data/index.html
How the last decade can be declared 'the warmest ever on Earth' when
we only have data dating back 130 years?
This is the kind of bullshit hyperbole in the media that burns my ass.
I hate that shit.
--
Scott Stroz
-
But Obama promised...
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>>
>> Agreed. But also apply that to Unions, PACs and interest groups. And
>> no bundling. Make the politicians have to really work for the campaign
>> funds.
>
>
Are you talking about the Op-Ed section? Already labeled opinions?
I was talking about the so-called unbiased news in the main section.
Maybe they should call all the news opinion.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> Lets see, you mean Washington Post commentators like Ch
Stabenow and Harkin seem to be talking about it.
Or are we supposed to ignore all threats until Harry passes them in
the middle of the night?
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> No legislation has been introduce regarding the fairness doctrine
> since 2005, and Obama has already
Do you just make up numbers at will?
The surplus was created with SS funds based on future revenue. Due to
the dotcom bust and the recession that followed that money never was a
surplus.
9/11 happened during a recession and the economy recovered very quickly.
The $700 trillion Bush gave to Obam
Lets see, you mean Washington Post commentators like Charles
Krauthammer, Karl Rove, Michael Gearson etc. Yeppers really radical
extremist left wingers there.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> There's everyone on MSNBC and CNN but nobody watches them. There's the
> NYT, WaPo and mo
Fox is the only station that broadcasts opinions?
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> that would bankrupt Fox then and there. They'd go broke printing out the
> labels
>
> hey that might not be a bad thing...
>
~~~
There's everyone on MSNBC and CNN but nobody watches them. There's the
NYT, WaPo and most of the media. But they're all dying because people
know it's pure BS. So lets make a law forcing people to watch the BS
or shut down the ones telling the truth.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Larry C. Ly
I would not be against completely restricting corps., unions, etc from
being able to donate to a campaign directly - but would be satisfied
in limiting donations to a level that more people would be able to
reach - even if its as little as $500 per person/corp/etc...
However, if we did have those
I should actually make a distinction between a PAC and a Union or a
Corporation. A PAC is specifically created to advocate for a specific
set of issues, so I'm ok with an individual donating money to a PAC
who then pools the money to run issue/candidate related ads. Unions
and Corporations aren't
yes there are too many special interests that would work against it.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>>
>> Agreed. But also apply that to Unions, PACs and interest groups. And
>> no bundling. Make the politicians hav
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
> Would you agree, then, that unions, PACs and interest groups are not
> 'people' and therefore should nto be allowed to donate to political
> campaigns?
Yes, I agree.
I also don't think that money is speech. Speech is speech. You can pay
mon
I think as long as laws are being passed that would affect a
corporation, it has rights to donate to whomever they want - up to a
very strict limit.
Once again..I agree corporations are not people. But that does not
mean that they are not affected by who is elected.
Would you agree, then, that u
I think maybe the rule should be - if you cannot vote - you cannot donate.
this would get all the foreign money out, and the painfully disparate
donations from corporations.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> Corporations are not people. They don't get to contribute to
Corporations are not people. They don't get to contribute to
campaigns. People do.Elections are for people to vote for
representatives in a democracy. Corporations are not people. Period.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> I agree with you. I just don't think corporations s
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> Agreed. But also apply that to Unions, PACs and interest groups. And
> no bundling. Make the politicians have to really work for the campaign
> funds.
Wouldn't that just be wonderful.probably not going to happen though.
--
Scott St
No legislation has been introduce regarding the fairness doctrine
since 2005, and Obama has already stated multiple times he is opposed
to reinstating it, so I suspect the whole "shut down talk radio
rhetoric" is coming only from talk radio.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> Dems,
Agreed. But also apply that to Unions, PACs and interest groups. And
no bundling. Make the politicians have to really work for the campaign
funds.
also increase the election cycle once every four years. That way
congressional reps don't have to engage in full time fundraising or be
so dependent o
Clinton left with about 800 billion surplus. Bush left with a 2
trillion deficit.
You reall need to be reacquainted with the concept of positive and
negative numbers if you cannot tell the difference.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Really?
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:32 PM, M
that would bankrupt Fox then and there. They'd go broke printing out the labels
hey that might not be a bad thing...
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> It doesn't force broadcasts to air shows, only to offer time to
> opposing opinions. Do you not remember the little snippets
No it would mean that if Limbaugh or Hannity bloviates, there is an
equal opportunity for someone to rebut him. For beck it would mean
having a full time job avoiding hate speech charges.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> But could that not force broadcasters to air shows
typical. You're not arguing using reason and data but via authority.
in other words arguing through ignorance.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> the fact that you are defending it is proof enough for me.
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Larry C. Lyons
> wrote:
>>
>> Bullshi
I know that the State Department has never really been looking out for
our best interests as a country but this is ridiculous. Unfortunately,
this is par for the course for them and is not limited to the Obama
administration. They pulled this stuff during Bush, Clinton, etc.
But of course, as the
Hey, that link's pretty handy actually.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <
zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> that's how I access all of my windows vm's.
>
>
> Here's something that might be useful:
>
> http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-map-a-ftp-to-a-drive-in-windows/
I agree with you. I just don't think corporations should be banned
from donating to political campaigns, they, like everyone else should
be limited - severely.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> Repeat after me. Corporations are not people. Anyone who tells you
> otherwise
that's how I access all of my windows vm's.
Here's something that might be useful:
http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-map-a-ftp-to-a-drive-in-windows/
On Jan 22, 2010, at 12:51 PM, Medic wrote:
>
>>
>> what's the downside of remoting?
>>
> Surely you've remoted into windows servers before
I think Casey's point is the opposite. $18.5 million is pocket change
when it comes to protecting one of the top 2 targets in the US. But
you're right. A smart terrorist will attack important targets like
Jerusalem, Texas. Easier than the real thing.
--
Michael
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:29 PM,
> Its a java app. just like CF or Open Office.
If the nature of Java apps on the desktop is that they need to have the JVM
settings tweaked before they run properly, then I would assert that Adobe
made a poor decision to create CFBuilder on top of Eclipse. I have no
problem tweaking the settings
h..I don't have that issue. I run several windows vm's on my desktop
which I access via vnc and it's just like sitting in front of real box. The
servers that I administer locally don't have a lag either through Remote
Desktop. The servers that are at a remote location do have a lag t
>
> Corporations are not people.
But apparently dolphins are now.
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/g
>
> what's the downside of remoting?
>
Surely you've remoted into windows servers before. You must know that it's a
great tool for doing admin etc but a horrible thing to have to actually do
any amount of work on.
~|
Want to rea
SLLOWW mouse response and keyboard press times...
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <
zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> not really, you said you don't want to deal with multiple copies of source
> code, why do you want to deal with multiple copies of your IDE?
not really, you said you don't want to deal with multiple copies of source
code, why do you want to deal with multiple copies of your IDE? Seems like
that would be a licensing nightmare.
what's the downside of remoting?
On Jan 22, 2010, at 12:33 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> Are you joking?
> You
I hope so ...
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> Are you joking?
> You must be.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <
> zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > why not just remote desktop or vnc into your dev server then and run
> > whatever ide on it
Repeat after me. Corporations are not people. Anyone who tells you
otherwise is trying to fuck you over.
Judah
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> I think each person and corporation should have donations capped at
> something like $1000. That way, no one person/corporation
Really?
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> Yes, Clinton didn't leave GWB the size of mess that GWB left Obama. Huge
> difference.
>
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them kno
Dems, the left, the fools pushing the fairness doctrine because head
to head competition failed.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Who is they?
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Sam wrote:
>>
>> The whole point now is to shut down talk radio and Fox News.
>>
>> Most of MSM
Are you joking?
You must be.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <
zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> why not just remote desktop or vnc into your dev server then and run
> whatever ide on it.
>
>
> On Jan 22, 2010, at 11:51 AM, Medic wrote:
>
> >
> > The thing I'm trying (
Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> BTW, what's with the we?
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Medic wrote:
> >
> > Well, we gave GWB eight... so... I dunno... how about at least until the
> end
> > of one term.
> >
>
>
~~
Yes, Clinton didn't leave GWB the size of mess that GWB left Obama. Huge
difference.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Well, the 2001 recession didn't last very long, see the difference?
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Medic wrote:
> >
> > Well, we gave GWB eight... so... I
So the terrorist will attack somewhere else.. big deal.
-Original Message-
From: Casey Dougall [mailto:ca...@uberwebsitesolutions.com]
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 9:42 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: New York Police Department will receive $18.5 million out of a
possible $20 million made
I think each person and corporation should have donations capped at
something like $1000. That way, no one person/corporation would get
preferential treatment.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> It would seem that the current conservative wing is closely following
> in J
why not just remote desktop or vnc into your dev server then and run whatever
ide on it.
On Jan 22, 2010, at 11:51 AM, Medic wrote:
>
> The thing I'm trying (and always have been trying) to avoid is having to run
> local versions of all my server software, which is why ftp with HS+5.5 has
> a
Who is they?
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> The whole point now is to shut down talk radio and Fox News.
>
> Most of MSM is already left leaning but that's not good enough. They
> want to stifle all dissenting views.
The federal government has been screwing NY out of homeland security
funds since day one. This is nothing new.
--
Michael
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Casey Dougall
wrote:
>
> I know NYC is a prime target, but really? 18.5 out of 20 million needed to
> assist in securing NYC?
>
> I'd ge
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Agreed, but he was a huge improvement over Cuomo.
> Did you forget about Spitzer and the current guy?
>
>
Outside of Spitzer's hooker issues, he was moving in the right direction.
Bruno fucked that up in the senate because he was a whining bitch!
'dissenting news'...is there such a thing?
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> The whole point now is to shut down talk radio and Fox News.
>
> Most of MSM is already left leaning but that's not good enough. They
> want to stifle all dissenting views.
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:5
Oops...that should say 'not normally watch/sponsor'
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
> Either way, they would be forced to air content that their viewers
> and/or advertisers would normal watch/sponsor. Essentially taking
> money out of the pockets of the broadcasters.
>
> I d
Either way, they would be forced to air content that their viewers
and/or advertisers would normal watch/sponsor. Essentially taking
money out of the pockets of the broadcasters.
I do like your last idea - too often in the media today opinion is
touted as fact.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:59 PM,
The whole point now is to shut down talk radio and Fox News.
Most of MSM is already left leaning but that's not good enough. They
want to stifle all dissenting views.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> The fairness doctrine was in place for years and no was forced to
> listen
Its a java app. just like CF or Open Office.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Justin Scott
wrote:
>
>> Tweak it grasshopper, tweak it.
>> Eclipse is a dog out of the box, once you get the
>> JVM settings right it's smooth sailing.
>> Google: speeding up Eclipse (or cfbuilder)
>
> I can understa
that's because you're probably using Beta 1 or 2. Beta 2 expired Jan
1. time to d/w the most recent version.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Casey Dougall
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
>>
>> Why not give CFBuilder a shot. it does have remote editing
>> ca
sounds like a good topic for a blog posting or for a CF Online User group preso.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Scott Stewart
wrote:
>
> Tweak it grasshopper, tweak it.
> Eclipse is a dog out of the box, once you get the JVM settings right it's
> smooth sailing.
>
> Google: speeding up Eclips
BTW, what's with the we?
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> Well, we gave GWB eight... so... I dunno... how about at least until the end
> of one term.
>
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something
Well, the 2001 recession didn't last very long, see the difference?
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> Well, we gave GWB eight... so... I dunno... how about at least until the end
> of one term.
>
~|
Want to rea
Agreed, but he was a huge improvement over Cuomo.
Did you forget about Spitzer and the current guy?
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Casey Dougall
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Sam wrote:
>
>>
>> Have you noticed all the really BLUE states are bankrupt or close to it?
>>
>>
>
>
It doesn't force broadcasts to air shows, only to offer time to
opposing opinions. Do you not remember the little snippets that were
occasionally aired at the end of newscasts when the station would run
an opinion piece and had to allow the opposing view to have a say?
Frankly I would be content
But could that not force broadcasters to air shows that may not be
profitable, or, possibly, not air shows that are?
Seems a bit unfair.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> The fairness doctrine was in place for years and no was forced to
> listen to anyone. That's the whole p
That's what happens when you don't keep your promises. In spite of
all the rhetoric from the right, few of those who voted for Obama are
willing to give him a free pass when he ignores or makes the wrong
choice on issues to matter to us.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Medic wrote:
>
> Ya, I g
The thing I'm trying (and always have been trying) to avoid is having to run
local versions of all my server software, which is why ftp with HS+5.5 has
always worked so well. The dev and prod servers have identical setups so I
don't run into "I don't know why it's not working, it worked on my mach
The fairness doctrine was in place for years and no was forced to
listen to anyone. That's the whole point of the fairness doctrine -
it allows the presentation of both sides of the story and gives the
listener options. Which is exactly right-wing talk show hosts are
against it. It takes away t
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Have you noticed all the really BLUE states are bankrupt or close to it?
>
>
Only because we had a replublican governor for such a long time!
George Pataki messed up NY real bad!
Well, we gave GWB eight... so... I dunno... how about at least until the end
of one term.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> People are finally paying attention to Mr Miracle: I will save the
> world with hope and change.
>
> How many years of failure do you think we should endure
It would seem that the current conservative wing is closely following
in Judge Taney's footsteps when it comes to reality checking.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> Free for all would be exactly the opposite of the result of this decision.
>
> I'm not surprised by the d
Have you noticed all the really BLUE states are bankrupt or close to it?
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Casey Dougall
wrote:
>
> I know NYC is a prime target, but really? 18.5 out of 20 million needed to
> assist in securing NYC?
>
> I'd get the hell out of Dodge!
>
> NEW YORK (AP) - Sen. Cha
Set up the site as local only, and continue to FTP outside of
Dreamweaver. Also, you can turn off caching on the site.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Medic wrote:
>
> Do you have a free, easy to implement suggestion?
> So far (the last 10 years or so) using ftp on a dev server has worked
> pe
People are finally paying attention to Mr Miracle: I will save the
world with hope and change.
How many years of failure do you think we should endure before we can
admit this admins plans can't work?
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> You missed what I meant by attention span.
You're right, for the most part. I've been through earthquakes,
hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, mudslides and fires. I'll take the
quakes.
But they are still scary to folks who haven't experienced them before.
The only thing that bothers me about quakes compared with the natural
disasters is the
I know NYC is a prime target, but really? 18.5 out of 20 million needed to
assist in securing NYC?
I'd get the hell out of Dodge!
NEW YORK (AP) - Sen. Charles Schumer says the Department of Homeland
Security has approved funding for a program to protect New York City against
a "dirty bomb" or nu
That is what happens when you sell as hard as they did.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> You missed what I meant by attention span. I didn't mean that people weren't
> paying attention. I meant the adhd the public seems to have with the current
> president. The people don't see
You missed what I meant by attention span. I didn't mean that people weren't
paying attention. I meant the adhd the public seems to have with the current
president. The people don't seem to have the foresight or fortitude to give
the man more than a few months to completely overhaul healthcare, re
It's the people that ARE paying attention that have turned against him.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> Ya, I guess I did. I think I had more faith in the attention span of the
> american public. After only a year people on both sides are ready to throw
> him to the flames.
>
The word soccer originally came from England, actually. It started out
as a short version of Association Football. As England started getting
involved with the rest of the kicking the round ball into the net
world, they started calling it football as well. America just kept the
original English co
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> Actually... no. It's called football. You folks are the exception to the
> rule. ;-)
>
No one wants to date a football "mom"
Soccer Mom sounds way sexier!
~|
Want to reach
Ya, I guess I did. I think I had more faith in the attention span of the
american public. After only a year people on both sides are ready to throw
him to the flames.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> You said that about electing Obama :P
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Med
Actually... no. It's called football. You folks are the exception to the
rule. ;-)
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Casey Dougall <
ca...@uberwebsitesolutions.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> >
> > And then the rivalry
> > between red and blue can go back to
> Why not just pull every talking head, left and right, off the air? That will
> do more to bridge the great divide than anything. And then the rivalry
> between red and blue can go back to where it belongs... at a footie darby.
Because we live in a country where the elected officials do really
s
heh, O thought he was talking about hacky-sac
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Casey Dougall
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Medic wrote:
>
>>
>> And then the rivalry
>> between red and blue can go back to where it belongs... at a footie darby.
>>
>>
>
> Someone doesn't live in U
Now that's funny sh*t right there. I don't care who you are ... ROFLMAO
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Justin Scott wrote:
> Every time I open Dreamweaver I feel like Clippy is going to jump out at
> me any
> moment ask say, "It looks like you're trying to build a web application,
> let
>
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> And then the rivalry
> between red and blue can go back to where it belongs... at a footie darby.
>
>
Someone doesn't live in USA, it's called Soccer :-)
~|
Want to reach th
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo