Re: Win 7 Pro v. Home Premium

good to know. IM like 1 week from pulling the trigger ... probably the transformer looking one from ibuypower.com Sent from my iPhone... don't hate On Apr 14, 2010, at 5:21 PM, Robert Munn wrote: > > yeah, i ended up buying a system with pro > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:29 AM, Matthew Smith

Re: FW: Evolution, Big Bang Polls Omitted From NSF Report

No I think I met him last week driving a cab in New York. On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Maureen wrote: > > That's because while we are looking for him in caves, he is sipping > tea with his cronies somewhere in a luxury villa, awaiting > instructions from his overlords for his next media stat

Re: FW: Evolution, Big Bang Polls Omitted From NSF Report

That's because while we are looking for him in caves, he is sipping tea with his cronies somewhere in a luxury villa, awaiting instructions from his overlords for his next media statement. On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Eric Roberts wrote: > > All that tech and we still can't find a living pe

Re: "It's all about the victims" - NOT. RCC continues to show its colors

I more comment :) http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/21/AR2007102100144_4.html Looks like I'm spewing left wing nonsense from years ago. On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Sam wrote: > I see you're a member of the Larry Lyons school of debate. > We're done. > > On Wed,

Re: See, the Daily Show is an equal opportunity harrasser

I think that the segments where Jon Stewart interviews people are real news. He is an excellent discussion-format host. The other parts of the show are entertainment. On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:23 PM, William Bowen wrote: > >> One is a fake news that many on this list think is real, the other is

Fwd: "It's all about the victims" - NOT. RCC continues to show its colors

-- Forwarded message -- From: Eric Roberts Date: Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:42 PM Subject: RE: "It's all about the victims" - NOT. RCC continues to show its colors To: cf-community No Sam...you are just clueless.. -Original Message- From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.co

RE: "It's all about the victims" - NOT. RCC continues to show its colors

No Sam...you are just clueless.. -Original Message- From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 3:56 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: "It's all about the victims" - NOT. RCC continues to show its colors I see you're a member of the Larry Lyons school of debat

Fwd: How Tweet It Is!: Library Acquires Entire Twitter Archive

now *this* is very cool. -- Forwarded message -- From: Library of Congress Date: Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:09 PM Subject: How Tweet It Is!: Library Acquires Entire Twitter Archive To: dana.tier...@gmail.com How Tweet It Is!: Library Acquires Entire Twitter Archive

Re: FW: Evolution, Big Bang Polls Omitted From NSF Report

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irreducible_complexity The Blood Clotting Agents (Behe's cascade analogy), the IC Eye and Flagellum arguments are easily refuted. Behe's mousetrap Analogy fails as well. Behe's Irreducible Complexity is based on a deliberate misunderstanding of biochemical processes

Re: Win 7 Pro v. Home Premium

yeah, i ended up buying a system with pro On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:29 AM, Matthew Smith wrote: > > Just ran into not having xp mode on home.  Pro offers this. > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Robert Munn wrote: > >> >> Any reason to go for Pro for a system that isn't going to be joining a

Re: See, the Daily Show is an equal opportunity harrasser

huh? Fox News outright lies? wow. really? On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:41 PM, William Bowen wrote: > > really? I believe that? > > You're sure? You can quote me? > > again... thought not. > >> I know you believe it so put your hand up. >> >> Then there's Angel and everyone except me that replied to

Re: is there a right answer?

i never got past Geometry I :( On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Jacob wrote: > > I took calculus in high school and that equation makes my head spin! > > -Original Message- > From: Judah McAuley [mailto:ju...@wiredotter.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 12:17 PM > To: cf-community >

Re: FW: Evolution, Big Bang Polls Omitted From NSF Report

>The problem with Irreducible Complexity is that it assume that the only >function of all the parts of the complex object is for what the complex >object is used for. > >It seems to ignore that the individual parts, while offering no benefit >in their current purpose, could have been used for s

Re: "It's all about the victims" - NOT. RCC continues to show its colors

I see you're a member of the Larry Lyons school of debate. We're done. On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Eric Roberts wrote: > > They are not getting a pass.  They reported the abuse when they discovered > it instead of trying to hide it like the catholic church did.  Get a fucking > clue already

Re: "It's all about the victims" - NOT. RCC continues to show its colors

They cover it up all the time. They don't put much effort into it since the media doesn't report it. On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Eric Roberts wrote: > > Schools haven't tried to cover it up...unlike the Cathloic Church... > ~

RE: "It's all about the victims" - NOT. RCC continues to show its colors

They are not getting a pass. They reported the abuse when they discovered it instead of trying to hide it like the catholic church did. Get a fucking clue already dude. -Original Message- From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 3:41 PM To: cf-community Su

RE: "It's all about the victims" - NOT. RCC continues to show its colors

Schools haven't tried to cover it up...unlike the Cathloic Church... -Original Message- From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 3:40 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: "It's all about the victims" - NOT. RCC continues to show its colors That's what I'm sayi

RE: "It's all about the victims" - NOT. RCC continues to show its colors

Whatever dumbass -Original Message- From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 3:39 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: "It's all about the victims" - NOT. RCC continues to show its colors Yeah that's my point. One group get's high-fives while the other get's s

Re: "It's all about the victims" - NOT. RCC continues to show its colors

Exactly, but why are the other groups getting a pass? On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Eric Roberts wrote: > > If a religion does wrong, it should pay just like any other group would. > ~| Want to reach the ColdFusion communit

Re: See, the Daily Show is an equal opportunity harrasser

really? I believe that? You're sure? You can quote me? again... thought not. > I know you believe it so put your hand up. > > Then there's Angel and everyone except me that replied to the thread: > Fox news outright lies -- will "If my life weren't funny, it would just be true; and that woul

RE: See, the Daily Show is an equal opportunity harrasser

I don't think anyone here things the Daily Shoe or Colbert report is real news...unlike folks on your side that think Rush, Glen, and Fox are real news. Eric -Original Message- From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 11:33 AM To: cf-community Subject: Re:

Re: "It's all about the victims" - NOT. RCC continues to show its colors

That's what I'm saying about the schools but you don't care because you think little Johnny got the teacher. On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Eric Roberts wrote: > > Too bad...maybe they should have done the right thing and reported it to > police. > ~~~

Re: "It's all about the victims" - NOT. RCC continues to show its colors

Yeah that's my point. One group get's high-fives while the other get's shut down and you in your oblivion support that. Not because you care about the kids, you obviously don't, you only care because you think the Church could get shut. On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Eric Roberts wrote: > > It

Re: Follow up on the helicopter incident

Association of Old Crows: http://www.crows.org/about/about-aoc.html ""The Association of Old Crows (AOC) is a not-for-profit international professional association with over 13,500 members and 180+ organizations engaged in the science and practice of Electronic Warfare (EW), Information Operatio

Re: "It's all about the victims" - NOT. RCC continues to show its colors

You responded to Larry's blurred comment with a pat on the back? Irony? On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Eric Roberts wrote: > > Isn't that a conservative modus operandi instead of making logical > comparisons? > > Eric > ~| Wa

Re: See, the Daily Show is an equal opportunity harrasser

I know you believe it so put your hand up. Then there's Angel and everyone except me that replied to the thread: Fox news outright lies On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:23 PM, William Bowen wrote: > > Show of hands, please. > > Who on this list thinks "The Daily Show with John Stewart" is a real > ne

Re: "It's all about the victims" - NOT. RCC continues to show its colors

> Herr Ratzinger I've kinda taken a liking to my Dad's version (and he's a 100% died in the wool pope-is-infallible kinda Catholic) ObersturmbannKardinalbischof Ratzinger. -- will "If my life weren't funny, it would just be true; and that would just be unacceptable." - Carrie Fisher

RE: Follow up on the helicopter incident

Because he is correct...all it does is give ammo to the enemy's cause. Eric -Original Message- From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 6:34 PM To: cf-community Subject: RE: Follow up on the helicopter incident Wtf is "Information Operations Institute a

Re: See, the Daily Show is an equal opportunity harrasser

> One is a fake news that many on this list think is real, the other is > editorial that everyone knows is one mans personal opinion. And don't > call me Surley :) Show of hands, please. Who on this list thinks "The Daily Show with John Stewart" is a real news program? anyone? ... anyone? t

RE: "It's all about the victims" - NOT. RCC continues to show its colors

If a religion does wrong, it should pay just like any other group would. Eric -Original Message- From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 5:53 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: "It's all about the victims" - NOT. RCC continues to show its colors So is your po

RE: "It's all about the victims" - NOT. RCC continues to show its colors

Too bad...maybe they should have done the right thing and reported it to police. Eric -Original Message- From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 5:51 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: "It's all about the victims" - NOT. RCC continues to show its colors On Mo

RE: "It's all about the victims" - NOT. RCC continues to show its colors

Yep...Herr Ratzinger was in charge of that group before he became pope. Eric -Original Message- From: Judah McAuley [mailto:ju...@wiredotter.com] Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 5:47 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: "It's all about the victims" - NOT. RCC continues to show its colors On

RE: is there a right answer?

I took calculus in high school and that equation makes my head spin! -Original Message- From: Judah McAuley [mailto:ju...@wiredotter.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 12:17 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: is there a right answer? x = starting salary x + 0.08x = 1.08x 1.08x + 0.05(1

RE: "It's all about the victims" - NOT. RCC continues to show its colors

It would be a good start *grin* I think they are reported...look at all the female teachers getting the spotlight for banging their students... Eric -Original Message- From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 1:35 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: "It's all a

RE: "It's all about the victims" - NOT. RCC continues to show its colors

Isn't that a conservative modus operandi instead of making logical comparisons? Eric -Original Message- From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 1:46 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: "It's all about the victims" - NOT. RCC continues to show its co

RE: Speaking of science: Michael Specter: The danger of science denial

Judah, I would agree with that 100%. I think people are freaking out without a basis in science, just as people are declaring this safe without a basis in science. We just don't have the long term studies to determine if this really is safe or not. If it is safe...it could be a real boon. Reall

Re: is there a right answer?

So, what I'm hearing you say is, my answer was correct, but imprecise. On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Ian Skinner wrote: > > On 4/14/2010 12:20 PM, Ian Skinner wrote: > > I got the same answer, #4 doing it forwards and backwards. > > > > 4thYear: 1.09x = 89000 > > 3rdYear: 0.99x = 4thYear > >

RE: FW: Evolution, Big Bang Polls Omitted From NSF Report

All that tech and we still can't find a living person hiding out in caves ;-) That is pretty cool... Eric -Original Message- From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:jmi...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 1:03 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: FW: Evolution, Big Bang Polls Omitted From NSF R

Re: is there a right answer?

On 4/14/2010 12:20 PM, Ian Skinner wrote: > I got the same answer, #4 doing it forwards and backwards. > > 4thYear: 1.09x = 89000 > 3rdYear: 0.99x = 4thYear > 2ndYear: 1.05x = 3rdYear > 1stYear: 1.08x = 2ndYear >Got me ~72730.4 > Or to continue my re-factoring. 1.09(0.99(1.05(1.08x))) =

Re: is there a right answer?

On 4/14/2010 12:02 PM, Jerry Johnson wrote: > I got 89009. for #4. > > Did you notice that the 3rd year was a pay cut? > I got the same answer, #4 doing it forwards and backwards. 4thYear: 1.09x = 89000 3rdYear: 0.99x = 4thYear 2ndYear: 1.05x = 3rdYear 1stYear: 1.08x = 2ndYear Got me ~727

Re: is there a right answer?

Doh! I don't want to admit my mistake, but I made one. Time to break out the simple math books. On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:06 PM, morgan l wrote: > > StartingSalary * 1.08 * 1.05 * .99 * 1.09 = > > > > Choice 1 > > $71,291 -> $87,238.75 > > Choice 2 > > $108,920 -> $133,285.34 > > Choice 3 > >

Re: is there a right answer?

x = starting salary x + 0.08x = 1.08x 1.08x + 0.05(1.08x) = 1.08x + 0.054x = 1.134x 1.134x - 0.01(1.134x) = 1.134x - 0.01134x = 1.12266x 1.12266x + 0.09(1.12266x) = 1.12266x + 0.1010394x = 1.2236994x 1.2236994x = 89,000 x = 72,730 If you need to show your work :) On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:06 P

Re: is there a right answer?

On 4/14/2010 11:58 AM, morgan l wrote: > 72730 (#4) comes out at 88999. > Well I get 88999.657362 for #4 which means if we take the round to the nearest whole dollar should be: 89,000 > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Tony wrote: > > >> M5A040 >> Bill is in his fifth year of employme

Re: is there a right answer?

StartingSalary * 1.08 * 1.05 * .99 * 1.09 = > Choice 1 > $71,291 -> $87,238.75 > Choice 2 > $108,920 -> $133,285.34 > Choice 3 > $71,290 -> $87,237.53 > Choice 4 > $72,730 -> $88,999.66 > Choice 5 > $72,723 -> $88,991.09 > > ~

Re: is there a right answer?

I got 89009. for #4. Did you notice that the 3rd year was a pay cut? On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:58 PM, morgan l wrote: > > 72730 (#4) comes out at 88999. > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Tony wrote: > > > > > M5A040 > > Bill is in his fifth year of employment for a company. He has > > r

Re: is there a right answer?

#5 comes out to 88999.99 On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Sandra Clark wrote: > > As best I can figure, none of them came out to $89,000 exactly. > 1) would have ended up at $89,731.29 > 3) would have ended up at $89,730.03 > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Tony wrote: > > > > > M5A040 > >

Re: is there a right answer?

72730 (#4) comes out at 88999. On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Tony wrote: > > M5A040 > Bill is in his fifth year of employment for a company. He has > received the following raises and pay cuts over the years: > > After the first year, Bill received an 8% raise. > After the second year, Bill

Re: is there a right answer?

As best I can figure, none of them came out to $89,000 exactly. 1) would have ended up at $89,731.29 3) would have ended up at $89,730.03 On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Tony wrote: > > M5A040 > Bill is in his fifth year of employment for a company. He has > received the following raises and

Re: Recoding my mother-in-law's website

Ahh no, discus is sweet. Good choice there for tracking comments... It was the rest of the "I dont need dynamic, build static everything" mentality. On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox < zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com> wrote: > > aw c'mon now. Tell me.. What should I know about dis

is there a right answer?

M5A040 Bill is in his fifth year of employment for a company. He has received the following raises and pay cuts over the years: After the first year, Bill received an 8% raise. After the second year, Bill received a 5% raise. After the third year, Bill received a 1% pay cut. After the fourth yea

Re: Recoding my mother-in-law's website

aw c'mon now. Tell me.. What should I know about disqus? On Apr 14, 2010, at 12:14 PM, Erika L. Rich wrote: > > Yesh. Not quite the choice I'd make - but it's irrelevant. :) Carry on. > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox < > zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> I'm

Re: Recoding my mother-in-law's website

well, if you've got a server, why not just code it in CF. Spider it, then rsync? The point of webby is that it can be generated on any machine with a ruby interpreter. It's very portable. I've got my project on a thumb drive and I've made changes to it on 3 different machines already. On

Re: Recoding my mother-in-law's website

Yesh. Not quite the choice I'd make - but it's irrelevant. :) Carry on. On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox < zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm embracing the cloud!!! > > On Apr 14, 2010, at 11:22 AM, Erika L. Rich wrote: > > > /me dies a little inside > > > ~

Re: Recoding my mother-in-law's website

I'm thinking of installing it on your dev box, crank out the static html and put that up on the site. On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: > > maybe...but why?  Seems kinda odd to install a server in order to create an > app that creates static html. > > > On Apr 14, 2010,

Re: Recoding my mother-in-law's website

I'm embracing the cloud!!! On Apr 14, 2010, at 11:22 AM, Erika L. Rich wrote: > > /me dies a little inside > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox < > zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Since all my comments are using disqus now, I don't need anything dynamic >> an

Re: Recoding my mother-in-law's website

maybe...but why? Seems kinda odd to install a server in order to create an app that creates static html. On Apr 14, 2010, at 11:51 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote: > > Something like this should not be at all hard to write using CF with > CFFile I suspect. > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Zap

Re: Recoding my mother-in-law's website

mm hmm...0_0 On 14 April 2010 12:22, Erika L. Rich wrote: > > /me dies a little inside ~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http:

Re: See, the Daily Show is an equal opportunity harrasser

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Vivec wrote: > > Sam, > > The Daily Show does not promote itself as a news program. It is a > Comedy Parody show. > Jon Stewart always says so. Wasn't it you that posted a clip just the other day about how Fox news claiming it was real? Or was that thread just s

Re: Recoding my mother-in-law's website

Something like this should not be at all hard to write using CF with CFFile I suspect. On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: > > It's probably been over a year since I've touched dreamweaver and my > mother-in-laws real estate site was all static html.  I had used DW templa

Re: See, the Daily Show is an equal opportunity harrasser

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Sam wrote: > > Does evil and trying to destroy the world ring a bell :) > Nope...not at allshould they? I never called Limbaugh evil. I called Dick Cheney evil. Think you've got me confused with someone else. -- I find it kind of funny, I find it kind o

Re: See, the Daily Show is an equal opportunity harrasser

"Surley" sounds too much like a freudian slip here... On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Sam wrote: > > One is a fake news that many on this list think is real, the other is > editorial that everyone knows is one mans personal opinion. And don't > call me Surley :) > > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at

Re: See, the Daily Show is an equal opportunity harrasser

Does evil and trying to destroy the world ring a bell :) On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:22 PM, G Money wrote: > > > What issues do I have with LImbaugh? Stewart is fake news, Limbaugh is > opinion.i don't have a problem with either.so.i don't really > know what you are talking about...

Re: See, the Daily Show is an equal opportunity harrasser

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 8:57 AM, G Money wrote: > For interviews with Stewart himself, yesbut with the > correspondents...no.  They cut those up and doctor them pretty heavy. > > But yeah, I'd have no problem going on that show if I was going to get face > time across the desk from Stewart. H

Re: See, the Daily Show is an equal opportunity harrasser

Given that he considers Limbaugh and Beck to be genuine news sources, then the answer is obvious, no he doesn't. On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:19 PM, morgan l wrote: > > No bias: one is billed as a comedy show that contains news and current > events, the other claims to be factual representations o

Re: See, the Daily Show is an equal opportunity harrasser

One is a fake news that many on this list think is real, the other is editorial that everyone knows is one mans personal opinion. And don't call me Surley :) On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:19 PM, morgan l wrote: > > No bias: one is billed as a comedy show that contains news and current > events, th

Re: See, the Daily Show is an equal opportunity harrasser

Sam, The Daily Show does not promote itself as a news program. It is a Comedy Parody show. Jon Stewart always says so. the Colbert Report also does not promote itself as a news program, neither does Jay Leno,Conan O'Brien or Saturday Night Live. Your analogy is quite ridiculous. Unless you are

Re: See, the Daily Show is an equal opportunity harrasser

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Sam wrote: > > You have no problems with the fake, manipulated news but you have > issues with Limbaugh? > See a little bias there? > Huh? Are you talking to me? What issues do I have with LImbaugh? Stewart is fake news, Limbaugh is opinion.i don't have a

Re: Recoding my mother-in-law's website

/me dies a little inside On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox < zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com> wrote: > Since all my comments are using disqus now, I don't need anything dynamic > any more.and static means secure! :) > > ~~

Re: See, the Daily Show is an equal opportunity harrasser

No bias: one is billed as a comedy show that contains news and current events, the other claims to be factual representations of news and events. Surely even you can tell the difference? On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Sam wrote: > > You have no problems with the fake, manipulated news but yo

Re: See, the Daily Show is an equal opportunity harrasser

You have no problems with the fake, manipulated news but you have issues with Limbaugh? See a little bias there? On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:57 AM, G Money wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Judah McAuley wrote: > >> >> I'd say that's true for the clips they show, obviously, but not for

Re: See, the Daily Show is an equal opportunity harrasser

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Judah McAuley wrote: > > I'd say that's true for the clips they show, obviously, but not for > the interviews. I remember, for instance, Mike Huckabee coming off as > very likable and he had a very smooth, engaging interview with > Stewart. And for all her protes

Re: See, the Daily Show is an equal opportunity harrasser

I'd say that's true for the clips they show, obviously, but not for the interviews. I remember, for instance, Mike Huckabee coming off as very likable and he had a very smooth, engaging interview with Stewart. And for all her protests to the contrary, he went very easy on Lynn Cheney. I haven't be

Recoding my mother-in-law's website

It's probably been over a year since I've touched dreamweaver and my mother-in-laws real estate site was all static html. I had used DW templates for it and it was really getting to be a pain in the ass. Anyway, found a cool app that generates static sites from text files. It has layouts, th

Re: See, the Daily Show is an equal opportunity harrasser

That is pretty much exactly how I expected those kinds of interviews went down.. Institutions that go on the Daily Show "just to get their message out there"...need to really think twice...because the Daily Show is the one that is going to be framing your message to whatever they want it to be.

Re: See, the Daily Show is an equal opportunity harrasser

hmmmhere's the actual link http://friendlyatheist.com/2010/04/14/behind-the-scenes-ffrfs-dan-barker-on-the-daily-show/ On Apr 14, 2010, at 9:46 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: > > Behind the Scenes: FFRF‚s Dan Barker on The Daily Sho > > ~~~

See, the Daily Show is an equal opportunity harrasser

Behind the Scenes: FFRF’s Dan Barker on The Daily Sho ~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-commun

Re: Article on why banning social media usually backfires

This very effect is why the RIAA and MPAA and copyright lawyers and software designers who get mad at users don't get it. People will find a way around roadblocks and potholes. And once they are around it, and developer a routine, those detours become "the way". Fighting against it is like holdi

Article on why banning social media usually backfires

http://mashable.com/2010/04/13/social-media-ban-backfire/ "Ontario Privacy Commissioner Anna Cavoukian noted that “Employees tend to re-route around a blog, go to another server, and find other ingenious ways of doing what they want to. And these rerouting efforts may actually be even more time c

Re: Win 7 Pro v. Home Premium

Just ran into not having xp mode on home. Pro offers this. On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Robert Munn wrote: > > Any reason to go for Pro for a system that isn't going to be joining a > Windows domain? I don't trust the built-in encryption, and I don't > need it to act as an RDS server, so w

Re: error in itues copying with home share, also trying to convert to mp3

Yes. We are using three of five auths. On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Maureen wrote: > > Is the old computer still authorized as well? > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Matthew Smith > wrote: > > > > Yes, I authorized the computer before starting the process. First thing > I > > did. >

Re: This is insane

I have that graph on my wall at work. Most of the people I work with don't get it. I refuse to explain it. On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote: > > I tried to work in something about Pirates and Global Warming but just > couldn't do it. > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 3:09 PM, G Mo