I would as well.
Sometimes it seems as if legislators have a contest to see who can
pass the most absurd laws.
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> This post is about abortion. This will be unlikely to change anyones
> mind one way or another and there isn't much in the wa
So what is it exactly that makes that slide hard to understand?
> The US Military fights a new war...against PowerPoint.
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/27/world/27powerpoint.html?src=me&ref=general
>
> The Obama administration is already employing Edward Tufte, perhaps
> the DOD can enlist
Actually Sam...the "lawful contact" phrase has been discussed at length
here...pay attention...Just because Glenn and Rush told you that it hasn't
been noticed, doesn't make it so
Eric
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> What fewer people have noticed is the phrase "lawful cont
The US Military fights a new war...against PowerPoint.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/27/world/27powerpoint.html?src=me&ref=general
The Obama administration is already employing Edward Tufte, perhaps
the DOD can enlist his help as well.
~~
This post is about abortion. This will be unlikely to change anyones
mind one way or another and there isn't much in the way of discussion
to be had at this point. But sometimes it is important to go on
record, stating your desire to kick every one of the legislators who
voted for these bills in t
Actually there is, stopping for no reason is a sign you aren't paying
attention to the signs, I almost got a ticket way back for sleeping
while driving because I wasn't reading the traffic signs :)
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> I don't think there is actually a law against st
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:44 PM, Scott Stewart
wrote:
>
> Well that's even less worrisome, breaking you're own security is kind of
> easy.
>
> It was built using the government built plans
The plans weren't meant to reduce not eliminate, but I already said
that. So maturely the guy who built it
I don't think there is actually a law against stopping at the top of
an exit ramp ;) he mainly wanted to smell my breath
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> With this bill a license will let you go. I think you should have
> gotten the ticket, not paying attention while driving, yo
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 10:34 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Closing the border
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:52 PM, Scott Stewart
wrote:
>
> It wasn't P&T, it was volunteers who built the wall section, and then
> breached i
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:52 PM, Scott Stewart
wrote:
>
> It wasn't P&T, it was volunteers who built the wall section, and then
> breached it..
Well that's even less worrisome, breaking you're own security is kind of easy.
> besides, have you seen the tunnels that Mexican drug dealers
> dig und
With this bill a license will let you go. I think you should have
gotten the ticket, not paying attention while driving, you do that
often yes?
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> but we don't need to prove citizenship.
>
> I recently had a chat with the California Highway Patrol a
but we don't need to prove citizenship.
I recently had a chat with the California Highway Patrol about why I
thought a certain exit ramp had a stop sign at the top (most do,
right? =) ) Anyway, he let me slide on the stopping at a non-existent
stop sign thing as well as some missing insurance and
exactly. And it's not even as though Ireland has no history of
citizens travelling to other countries to commit acts of terrorism ;)
I say this as someone who is half Irish on both sides and hs a close
relative living in Ireland.
> And this quote is awesome. Profiling is perfect, as long as they
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 9:44 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Closing the border
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Scott Stewart
wrote:
>
> P&T are comedians and not even good at that. The walls seem to be
> working elsewhe
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Scott Stewart
wrote:
>
> P&T are comedians and not even good at that. The walls seem to be
> working elsewhere.
>
>>>the...walls...don't...work, go find the episode, the wall section was
> built to the government spec and breached in under five minutes.. it's a ba
Profiles of serial killers have included race as well as other
criteria - I imagine that a thorough profile of other types of
criminals would include race (if appropriate) as well as other
criteria.
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Scott Stewart
wrote:
>
> Psychological vs. Racial ?
>
> -Ori
Psychological vs. Racial ?
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 8:56 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Closing the border
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:44 PM, Vivec wrote:
> And this quote is awesome. Profiling is perfect, as long a
Sure there'd be an exit strategy..
Fight their way to Cozumel, and then forget why they came..
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 8:49 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Closing the border
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Scott S
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:44 PM, Vivec wrote:
> And this quote is awesome. Profiling is perfect, as long as they aren't
> profiling anyone that looks like me.
> LOL!
Why is it OK to use profiling to catch serial killers, but not other criminals?
--
Scott Stroz
---
You can make th
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Scott Stewart
wrote:
> 3) it's impossible to round up and deport all 12 million illegals in the US,
> so we give them a simple option, you want citizenship, join the military.
And then, we can invade Mexico... without an exit strategy
Problem solved.
(for
Mexico has issued a travel warning over the Arizona law.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/26/arizona-immigration-law-r_n_552054.html#s85543
And this quote is awesome. Profiling is perfect, as long as they aren't
profiling anyone that looks like me.
LOL!
"Gov. Jim Gibbons seemed more hesita
With the GPL, it's *all about the distribution*.
(IANAL!)
So if you were to bundle Joomla *with* your extension, then you would
have to "share" your extension source.
You couldn't like, sell a version of Joomla that contains your
extension, basically.
So long as they are not bundled (distribut
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 8:29 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Closing the border
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Scott Stewart
wrote:
>
> 1) How do we prevent these people from coming in illegally in the first
> place. We
Not once they're equipped with US military standard issue.
Those are really big slingshots.
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Medic wrote:
> > 1. 111 million (read:all) Mexicans enter U.S. illegally
>
> 1.5 Cameron invades Mexico with
What fewer people have noticed is the phrase "lawful contact," which
defines what must be going on before police even think about checking
immigration status. "That means the officer is already engaged in some
detention of an individual because he's violated some other law," says
Kris Kobach, a Un
You're going in with that much artillery?
-Original Message-
From: Cameron Childress [mailto:camer...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 8:30 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Closing the border
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Medic wrote:
> 1. 111 million (read:all) Mexicans en
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Medic wrote:
> 1. 111 million (read:all) Mexicans enter U.S. illegally
1.5 Cameron invades Mexico with a slingshot and chewing gum
Anyone wanna vacation in my recently acquired country?
-Cameron
...
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Scott Stewart
wrote:
>
> 1) How do we prevent these people from coming in illegally in the first
> place. We don't build walls, there's an episode of Penn and Teller's
> Bullshit that uses the plans for the wall, and it's breached in under five
> minutes. We use t
Uhmm... the US military already has a program that does just this, currently
it's voluntary, and it's very successful..
It would be offered to only those currently in the US, once we tighten up
the border
-Original Message-
From: Medic [mailto:hofme...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 27
> 3) it's impossible to round up and deport all 12 million illegals in the
US,
> so we give them a simple option, you want citizenship, join the military.
haha. anyone else envision this:
1. 111 million (read:all) Mexicans enter U.S. illegally
2. 111 million illegal Mexican immigrants take the m
Weird analogy, because you're telling him, rather than him witnessing it..
As far as I know, witnessing a crime and not reporting it is in itself
illegal...
But that's not my point..
This Arizona law, is just another band-aid that sooner or later will be
found either unconstitutional or flat il
My understanding was no.
If you make changes to the core, you need to make those changes available
for download.
If the extensions are contained within separate code files, and individually
included and addable, then no.
In an open source community it is considered bad form not to share, but I
Is it true that if you Extend Joomla under the GPL, and write extensions you
need to be prepared to make your code available to Third Parties if
requested?
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let
yes it is. So would it not be defeating the purpose to hide a murderer?
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> The logic is that they don't want people...even if they are here illegally,
> to be afraid to come forward to police with information that can lead to
> arrests.
>
>
I think its cute you consider Budweiser to be 'beer'
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Matthew P. Smith
wrote:
>
> All of Budweiser's beers give me a headache. Only brand that does that.
>
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 2:49 PM, G Money wrote:
>
>>
>> I love budweiser.
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at
All of Budweiser's beers give me a headache. Only brand that does that.
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 2:49 PM, G Money wrote:
>
> I love budweiser.
>
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Scott Stewart >wrote:
>
> >
> > dude.. that's low!!
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Judah McAuley
> > w
He also obvious has never been to Aurora, IL or doesn't know squat about
because if he did he would know that I think there are more Mexicans in the
house across the street from me than there are in Mexico city...Brian is
just a moron teabagger (but I repeat myself) who thinks he is a tough guy
be
The logic is that they don't want people...even if they are here illegally,
to be afraid to come forward to police with information that can lead to
arrests.
Eric
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> Santa Fe is a sanctuary city. It made that choice so it would be
> easier to enfor
I love budweiser.
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Scott Stewart wrote:
>
> dude.. that's low!!
>
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Judah McAuley
> wrote:
> >
> > Budweiser drinker!
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Jerry Johnson wrote:
> >>
> >> Jerkface!
> >>
> >> Wait, you are in P
Them's fightin' words...
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> Budweiser drinker!
>
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Jerry Johnson wrote:
> >
> > Jerkface!
> >
> > Wait, you are in Portland.
> >
> > California driver!
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Juda
dude.. that's low!!
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> Budweiser drinker!
>
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Jerry Johnson wrote:
>>
>> Jerkface!
>>
>> Wait, you are in Portland.
>>
>> California driver!
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Judah McAuley wrote
w00tThank you...I was beginning to really get worried.
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> I thought it was funny :)
>
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>>
>> Not about people committing murder but that I would use Law & Order as
>> a source for ke
I thought it was funny :)
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> Not about people committing murder but that I would use Law & Order as
> a source for keeping up to date in current events.
>
> Sometimes I swear we have all lost our senses of humor.
There are definitely gray areas here. I don't buy the argument that the DA or
police started the criminal investigation and Apple had nothing to do with it.
I doubt the DA saw it as criminal until consulting with Apple.
If the felony it is simply receipt/purchase of the lost item, then why
con
Not about people committing murder but that I would use Law & Order as
a source for keeping up to date in current events.
Sometimes I swear we have all lost our senses of humor.
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> oh, that stuff about people commiting murder, that was a joke? oh.
>
This sounds like a Clive Cussler novel in the works
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Jerry Johnson wrote:
>
> http://www.uri.edu/artsci/his/mua/in_the_field/jd1.shtml
>
> The ship lies, today, several meters beneath the street level. Lining the
> construction fence on the streets above are
oh, that stuff about people commiting murder, that was a joke? oh.
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> I was trying to make a funny. I guess I failed.
>
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Dana wrote:
>>
>> see if you can find a link for that, will you Scott?
>>
>> On Tue, A
I was trying to make a funny. I guess I failed.
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> see if you can find a link for that, will you Scott?
>
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Dana wrote:
>> Santa Fe is a sanctuary city. It made that choice so it would be
>> easier to enforce the la
I will try to find the study later on today. The gist of it was that
most illegal immigrant pay taxes and yet are barred by statute from
receiving services, Just now I have to go tho, spent too much time on
this already.
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Brian Thornton
wrote:
>
> Hi Dana. When y
see if you can find a link for that, will you Scott?
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Dana wrote:
> Santa Fe is a sanctuary city. It made that choice so it would be
> easier to enforce the law. I do not understand what logic would cause
> a city to hide a murderer.
>
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 1
Santa Fe is a sanctuary city. It made that choice so it would be
easier to enforce the law. I do not understand what logic would cause
a city to hide a murderer.
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Dana wrote:
>
>> And these same towns have
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Dana wrote:
> And these same towns have allowed and
>> encouraged sanctuaries, where not only are illegals protected from ICE to
>> avoid deportation, but are also hidden from police looking for them on other
>> criminal charges, like kidnapping, drugs, rape and
to which I say to you, Jerry, that it is a lot easier to be a legal
immigrant from Canada than if you are from Mexico or Guatemala. Oh
and ICE and quick resolution do not belong in the same sentence.
> The difference I see now is that it is no longer acceptable for public
> employees to purpo
> I am walking down the street. Can a policeman stop me and ask me for proof
> of immigration status? (I say no).
depends. Are you in Arizona and do you look Mexican?
> I am at home, and the dog catcher comes in my yard. Can he ask me for proof
> of immigration status? (I say no).
In Arizona, Y
Hi Dana. When you say "Most do in fact pay taxes and receive no
services at all" what do you mean?
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> actually...I'd like to see some documentation for the don't pay taxes,
> drain the social services thing. Most do in fact pay taxes and receive
> n
thread hogging? That's a crime now? Alert the media! :D
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> Hey Scott...I am pro homeschooling now...
>
> You are not just a dumbass Brian...but a complete fucking idiot...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Thornton [mailto:vegasth
but see in order for that to be effective everyone else has to have
all their paperwork in order too. And I have to say, that was one
thing I really hated about Paris -- the fact that the police would
stop you as you were walking down the street and ask for your papers.
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:
I was referring to my (admittedly limited) experience where illegal
immigrants work in many 'cash only' jobs. If they pull in a paycheck -
which might be difficult or even impossible given their immigration
status - than I would stipulate that my assessment would be incorrect.
Most illegal immigra
you are correct as to how the law is written but not, I think, in how
it will be applied. And sure, if it is misapplied there will be a
great outcry but that will be small consolation to the people
languishing in jail waiting for their relatives to produce their
identification.
On Mon, Apr 26, 20
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
> Yes, Scott, it is stealing. And I would steal to feed my kids if that
> is the only option I had. Would you?
I would. And I would also expect to be held accountable for those
actions should I get caught.
>
>>> But if they are otherwise
well, the law only requires it if you are an immigrant. And note that
it's not an easy law to comply with due to the size of the temporary
card, and complying with it is risky as the document is very difficult
to get replaced.
However, Hispanics are the people who will be asked to show that they
well it kinda was if we understood it correctly, because however
sympathetic the plaintiff might have been, he just did not have the
law on his side.
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> That was hardly a frivolous lawsuit...
===
> The suing of the city has some pretty good
actually...I'd like to see some documentation for the don't pay taxes,
drain the social services thing. Most do in fact pay taxes and receive
no services at all, from what I have read. I'm not saying illegal
immigration is a *good* thing, but the Arizona law is trying to solve
a phantom problem.
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 5:10 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>>
> I have more
>> scorn for someone that steals a car stereo because they are bored or
>> it looks cool than I do for someone that shop lifts to pick up food
>> for their kids. Both t
Budweiser drinker!
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Jerry Johnson wrote:
>
> Jerkface!
>
> Wait, you are in Portland.
>
> California driver!
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
>> Jerry and I have, thus far, been having a very civil discussion.
>>
>
>
>
~~~
I am assuming site speed is not part of the survey.. unless it is just
sloow for me.
-Original Message-
From: Zaphod Beeblebrox [mailto:zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 8:53 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Interesting survey
State of web devel
Jerkface!
Wait, you are in Portland.
California driver!
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
> Jerry and I have, thus far, been having a very civil discussion.
>
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 3:38 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "If the Republican legislators who passed this bill had backed comprehensive
> immigration reform, this wouldn't be an issue."
>
> Typical. I am so not surprised you wrote that.
Of course I wrote that. It is true and it was a counterbalan
State of web development 2010
http://www.webdirections.org/sotw10/
I feel like a lemming after reading that :)
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know
on the House of Fusion mailin
>I suspect the jobs won't go unfilled, they will just become $100/day/person
>jobs instead of $20. This will drive up construction costs, restaurant
>kitchen costs, gardening costs and most menial labour jobs.
>
>Citizens will be like: "What the fuck? Why does it cost more than a couple
>hundred a
Ah, it has been returned, as soon as Apple asked for it. And they "tried" to
put it all back together.
But yeah, damaging it was probably not a great help to their defense.
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Casey Dougall <
ca...@uberwebsitesolutions.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:23
So will the Police only be pulling spanish looking people over and asking
for "Der Papers, HEIL!"
or will it be all non whites?
Anyone non-whites plan to vacation in Arizona anytime soon?
"I'm not going back to Arizona as long as it remains a police state, which
is what the appalling anti-immigr
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Jerry Johnson wrote:
>
> Actually, it isn't Apple.
>
> It is the police and district attorney who decide a crime was committed.
>
> (Which it looks like in this case it probably was - since knowingly
> purchasing and taking possession of lost property is a theft
The DA called a halt to the investigation because the police may have broken
some laws.
Apple's pockets are deep though, and they seem to have taken a decision to
make an example of Gizmodo.
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion commu
Actually, it isn't Apple.
It is the police and district attorney who decide a crime was committed.
(Which it looks like in this case it probably was - since knowingly
purchasing and taking possession of lost property is a theft crime in CA.)
And no. They can ask for a warrant from a judge if th
I suppose y'all have heard about Gizmodo revealing the iPhone 4.
http://gizmodo.com/5520471/the-tale-of-apples-next-iphone?skyline=true&s=i
Did you hear the police confiscated all of Jason Chen's computers because "it
was used as the means of committing a felony"?
http://gizmodo.com/5524843/
I
Um yes. The financial district in San Francisco used to be a mud flat. During
the gold rush clipper ships would drop off passengers. Unfortunately many of
these ships had to be abandoned because the crews also took off to hunt for
gold. So they were towed to these mud flats and left to rot.
E
http://www.uri.edu/artsci/his/mua/in_the_field/jd1.shtml
The ship lies, today, several meters beneath the street level. Lining the
construction fence on the streets above are hundreds of spectators drawn to
the incongruous spectacle of a ship lying deep in the heart of San
Franciscos Financial D
I have to agree with Scott here, not with the law, as written it sounds far
too draconian and open to abuse.
We aren't supposed to be a society that checks its papers and answers to big
brother.
I believe we need real border security. I'm wishy washy on a guest worker
visa program. One that al
My point was that there are likely other laws that would cover a
person riding a streetcar in Portland shooting at a jack rabbit. So,
not enforcing that law does not mean someone gets away with a crime.
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:14 AM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> I'm against a law that would be a blank
Word.
-Original Message-
From: Judah McAuley [mailto:ju...@wiredotter.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 12:30 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Closing the border
Have to agree with Jerry on this one.
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:13 PM, Jerry Johnson wrote:
>
> You are coming across as
I'm against a law that would be a blanket ban on the firing of weapons in
public.
How do you train? Train the way you fight.
How about blanks? Simunitions?
Self defense?
How about private land owners that are within city limits but have enough
land to shoot responsibly?
Indoor ranges, both
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> I would have liked to see a stronger stimulus plan. Economists argued
> that in order to see a substantial effect, it would have had to have
> been a larger percentage of GDP, which makes sense to me. But on the
> other hand, it is an exp
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:49 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> Hey Scott...I am pro homeschooling now...
I saw that..nice to see you caem around ;-)
Of course, now I am conflicted. Should I be upset with Brian? He was
trying to insult you, and in the process, insulted me.
--
Scott Stroz
-
So, you are OK with people firing weapons in public? Seems to me that
any weapons laws would take precedent over the jack rabbit one. Just
me though.
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:40 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>> Why even have immigration laws
I would consider that law archaic - as I would with many other laws.
However, I do not consider immigration laws to be archaic.
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:40 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>> Why even have immigration laws if they are not enfor
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
I have more
> scorn for someone that steals a car stereo because they are bored or
> it looks cool than I do for someone that shop lifts to pick up food
> for their kids. Both things are illegal. I have more moral problems
> with the first
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:44 AM, Jerry Johnson wrote:
> I DO believe, if the dog catcher is told be me at the door "yes, I brought
> that dog over the border yesterday when I came here illegally", the dog
> catcher now has a duty to tell someone.
>
> Do I like that personally? No. It is too KGB
"If the Republican legislators who passed this bill had backed comprehensive
immigration reform, this wouldn't be an issue."
Typical. I am so not surprised you wrote that.
It wouldn't be an issue if the government enforced the laws that exist now.
There would be no need for comprehensive immigr
89 matches
Mail list logo
