am I missing something? They're going to ask you about your sexual orientation
and gender identityand?
I guess I don't see the big deal. Years back, it was pretty cut and dried in
most peoples minds. When you checked the male box, you were a heterosexual
male. When you checked the
eh?!
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> Its Winders only.
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Tony Weeg wrote:
>>
>> hi peeps
>>
>> is there no Mac version of a LiveCycle PDF Form creation tool? I can't seem
>> to find it to try or download from adobe.com.
>>
>> thx!
>>
Its Winders only.
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Tony Weeg wrote:
>
> hi peeps
>
> is there no Mac version of a LiveCycle PDF Form creation tool? I can't seem
> to find it to try or download from adobe.com.
>
> thx!
> tw
>
> Sent from my iPhone... Don't hate.
>
>
~~
I will continue to give the position they hold the respect it deserves
as it seems to have done me pretty good so far.
You keep treating every police officer like they are a criminal and
see where that gets you. I hope you never have a real need for
assistance from a law enforcement officer. It w
hi peeps
is there no Mac version of a LiveCycle PDF Form creation tool? I can't seem to
find it to try or download from adobe.com.
thx!
tw
Sent from my iPhone... Don't hate.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http:
I want a copy :)
http://www2.b3ta.com/host/creative/10643/1201271267/Obi.jpg
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive
Pick lung! Pick lung!
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> Would you like a tissue Scott?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 7:23 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject:
Would you like a tissue Scott?
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 7:23 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: US Man refuses to answer Immigration questions.Apparently, he
was right.
Even taking into account everything you get fro
Even taking into account everything you get from the news and your
personal accounts, you are still talking about a very small percentage
of police officers.
Eric, its pretty much the same as your feelings about homeschooling.
You are judging a large group of people based on the words and actions
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "What? Jerry was talking about killing people because they know how to
> read-- fascist "competition". I don't think the idea is super-funny,
> personally. LOL"
>
> Actually, I wasn't. I was talking about those ivory tower academics who
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 3:03 PM, denstar wrote:
>>
>> What? Jerry was talking about killing people because they know how to
>> read-- fascist "competition". I don't think the idea is super-funny,
>> personally. LOL
>
> And I was pointing out you'
It's also from my personal experience, which I have stated several times but
you continue to chose to ignore.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 2:06 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: US Man refuses to answer Immigration questi
You don't? yeah right...
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 1:53 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: US Man refuses to answer Immigration questions.Apparently, he
was right.
So, you admit that you apply different rules to diff
I worked in academia for a while. Met a lot of over-educated fools.
My favorite quote: "Those of you who think you know everything are
annoying those of us who do".
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> Actually, I wasn't. I was talking about those ivory tower academics who
That's because the alter ego of Steven King haunts this list ...
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <
zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sometimes your post shows up on google even before you post it.
>
>
~~
"What? Jerry was talking about killing people because they know how to
read-- fascist "competition". I don't think the idea is super-funny,
personally. LOL"
Actually, I wasn't. I was talking about those ivory tower academics who
think they know how to run everything even though they have no r
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 3:03 PM, denstar wrote:
>
> What? Jerry was talking about killing people because they know how to
> read-- fascist "competition". I don't think the idea is super-funny,
> personally. LOL
And I was pointing out you're both wrong.
> "Intelligentsia" isn't just educators
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 2:17 PM, denstar wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>>> A lot of the time, the intelligentsia are the first to go under fascist
>>> regimes. It is important to get rid of like minded groups th
Clear as mud
What are you trying to say?
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Sisk, Kris wrote:
>
> Ok, how about this then. On 90% of the issues you see in politics I fall
> dead center or real close to it. There are a few issues which I feel
> that the correct stance is so blindingly obvious tha
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 2:17 PM, denstar wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>> A lot of the time, the intelligentsia are the first to go under fascist
>> regimes. It is important to get rid of like minded groups that can split
>> the base. After rival factions are
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "I was mocking Eric for pointing out how ridiculous it is to think the smart
> and educated are fascist and then goes on to point out how they are the
> first targets."
>
>
> A lot of the time, the intelligentsia are the first to go under f
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h6109/show
H.R.6109 - Health Data Collection Improvement Act of 2010
To amend the Public Health Service Act to require the Secretary of
Health and Human Services to ensure that each HHS health service
program or HHS health survey provides, to the extent the Sec
I knew that about him the day he joined this list. :)
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> So, you watch the news and see a few story about a 'bad' police
> officer and automatically assume they are all 'bad'? That is anecdotal
> evidence at best.
>
> A police officers are li
So, you watch the news and see a few story about a 'bad' police
officer and automatically assume they are all 'bad'? That is anecdotal
evidence at best.
A police officers are like network administrators in that if they are
doing their job correctly, you never hear about it, but if something
bad h
What does ' using your badge as a Viagra replacement' mean? It makes no sense.
Just so I am clear, are you saying that it is OK for people in some
professions to make mistakes, but not other professions?
If so, you are again treating different groups by different rules.
Maybe its a good thing yo
So, you admit that you apply different rules to different groups? Interesting.
I do not absolutely trust all members of any group. I honestly think
that a majority of politicians start off with admirable intentions.
Most politicians that directly impact my life are at the local or
state level. At
Again...unfortunately, it's not just a few. One just has to watch the news
and read the newspaper or just live life to see that.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 1:44 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: US Man refuses to
Making amends after you have been fined or put in jail or worse is too late.
There is a difference between making a mistake and using your badge as a
Viagra replacement. If a doctor makes a mistake, he gets sued for
malpractice. It is too late then most of the time. Accounting issues and
softwa
It's never too late to learn from the mistake, but it is sometimes too late to
correct the damage it's done. Just ask some of the guys who went to prison in
the 80s and early 90s only to be cleared and released years later when the
technology to make reliable use of DNA evidence became availabl
Becauser you are comparing 2 different groups. Do you automatically
absolutely trust all politicians? Or do you just assume that they are full
of it? Better yet, do you automatically trust all Democratic politicians or
do you assume that they are full of it? Why is ok to discriminate against
th
Its also pretty stupid to judge an entire group of people based on the
words and actions of a few members of that group, but you seem to have
no issue with that.
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> Comparing cops to muslims is pretty stupid. You are arguing apples and
> roc
So, now, you are expecting police officers to NEVER make mistakes?
Does this attitude follow over into any other professions? medicine?
accounting? software development?
I disagree that its ever 'too late'. If someone makes a mistake and
owns up to that mistake, is remorseful because of the resul
Ok, how about this then. On 90% of the issues you see in politics I fall
dead center or real close to it. There are a few issues which I feel
that the correct stance is so blindingly obvious that the fact that
there's even a debate on it leaves me flabbergasted. These are the
issues which I can be
Again, why is it wrong to judge one group based on the actions and
words of a few, but OK to do so to another group?
That, to me, is hypocritical, and that has been my point this whole thread.
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> Comparing cops to muslims is pretty stupid.
Afterwards is too late unless he is paying your fines or serving your jail
time
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 1:30 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: US Man refuses to answer Immigration questions.Apparently, he
was rig
Comparing cops to muslims is pretty stupid. You are arguing apples and
rocks.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 1:19 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: US Man refuses to answer Immigration questions.Apparently, he
was right.
I wish bipartisanship was worse hehehe...I think you meant partisanship ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Barnes [mailto:critic...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 1:13 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: File in scary as hell
"not saying that it is any different, but people k
The violation is just as bad, and I said as much.
Where the difference lies is with how the overzealous officer handles
himself afterwards.
As I said, everyone makes mistakes. Unfortunately, sometimes when some
people make mistakes others get inured or die, and other have their
rights violated.
You can't average you extremism and claim the middle.
Compromise doesn't always work. Sometimes you need people to fight for
what's right and not just give in.
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Sisk, Kris wrote:
>
> No. Not even close. I get to the extremes on one or two issues, but
> they're op
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Sisk, Kris wrote:
>
> No. Not even close. I get to the extremes on one or two issues, but
> they're opposite extremes. Overall I'm a disillusioned moderate. I think
> a whole lot more compromise on capital hill would be the best thing for
> this country and I woul
Overzealous to me is just as bad as a bad officer. The intention is
irrelevant as the end result is the same.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 11:30 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: US Man refuses to answer Immigration ques
I assume you have proof? Links? Or is this just opinion pawned off as
fact like how you feel about homeschooling?
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> Except that it is not just a few...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Mon
How so?
All I was asking for was some consistency. If I made disparaging
remarks about any other group of people based on the words and actions
of a few, I would get crucified on this list for it. Why is it OK when
when you are referring to law enforcement officers?
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:12
Except that it is not just a few...
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 10:53 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: US Man refuses to answer Immigration questions.Apparently, he
was right.
Kris, slice it any way you want, justify
"I was mocking Eric for pointing out how ridiculous it is to think the smart
and educated are fascist and then goes on to point out how they are the
first targets."
A lot of the time, the intelligentsia are the first to go under fascist
regimes. It is important to get rid of like minded groups
No. Not even close. I get to the extremes on one or two issues, but
they're opposite extremes. Overall I'm a disillusioned moderate. I think
a whole lot more compromise on capital hill would be the best thing for
this country and I would be pleasantly surprised to see it actually
happen.
-Ori
Now you are just being stupid Scott...
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 10:25 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: US Man refuses to answer Immigration questions.Apparently, he
was right.
Oh...so, its OK to pre-judge people as
Apples and oranges
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 10:18 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: US Man refuses to answer Immigration questions.Apparently, he
was right.
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Phillip Vector
wrote:
I know quite a few cops that don't think it is disrespectful...to include my
brother in law and several of my family members.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 10:06 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: US Man refuses to answer I
"not saying that it is any different, but people keep yelling about change..
it won't come from the Tea Party.. change will only come from outside of the
Democratic/Republican joint political machine"
The irony in here is so thick, you could cut it with a knife.
President Obama ran on a platform
Go learn some history Sam...
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 9:18 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Liberals and Atheists Smarter than Conservatives and Believers
Think about it Larry, your the one spewing insults here.
I was m
Aren't you one?
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Sisk, Kris wrote:
>
> Why is it people on the political extremes never realize the irony?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 11:54 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: File
Why is it people on the political extremes never realize the irony?
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 11:54 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: File in scary as hell
The puppet masters. You know, the ones that told you the Obama cha
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> The puppet masters. You know, the ones that told you the Obama changy
> thing was good but the Palin changy thing, which is what Obama was
> supposed to do, is bad. The same ones that had you convinced Bush was
> an idiot. Now they tell you Obama
What are you like 10-years-old?
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> figure you'd weasel out of it.
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 5:57 AM, Sam wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, I'm not really a gambling man.
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Larry C. Lyons
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> 3 par
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:01 PM, G Money wrote:
> Who's "they"?
>
> (This should be good!)
The puppet masters. You know, the ones that told you the Obama changy
thing was good but the Palin changy thing, which is what Obama was
supposed to do, is bad. The same ones that had you convinced Bush w
So you admit you were wrong ( due to poor acumen) and are backtracking
to previous alleged instances? Ones that you're too busy to look up?
As for the tantrum, Larry you should check your blood pressure. You
have the majority of tantrums on this list and nobody seems phased by
them.
On Mon, Sep
figure you'd weasel out of it.
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 5:57 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> Sorry, I'm not really a gambling man.
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Larry C. Lyons
> wrote:
>>
>> 3 parts, $20 on each
>> 1. O'donnell wins. I say no.
>>
>> 2. Palin wins the GOP nomination. again I say no.
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:38 PM, G Money wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Judah McAuley
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Amen to that. I mean, I think you ought to be embarrassed about the
>> > Giants, but I'm just a hater :)
>>
>> *SNA
Yeah, but you said it better
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> Did I just say the same thing as Sam? :D
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Micha
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> You have a temper tantrum when you don't understand. You've
> demonstrated your lack of acumen and understanding may times. your
> response is typical.
>
I am not a big fan of acumen, it always gives me bad gas.
Thank you, I will be
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Judah McAuley
> wrote:
>
> > Amen to that. I mean, I think you ought to be embarrassed about the
> > Giants, but I'm just a hater :)
>
> *SNAP*
>
*warning, thread hijack*
Brandon Jacobs throwing his hel
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
> Amen to that. I mean, I think you ought to be embarrassed about the
> Giants, but I'm just a hater :)
*SNAP*
--
Scott Stroz
---
You can make things happen, you can watch things happen or you can
wonder what the f*&k happene
Same as any online space. Don't say things you're gonna be a ashamed of
down the road and you should be fine. Honestly I'd like to think that a
prospective employer would put more weight on my resume and portfolio
than on where I stand politically. If I miss out on a job because
someone else's por
You have a temper tantrum when you don't understand. You've
demonstrated your lack of acumen and understanding may times. your
response is typical.
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 6:18 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> Think about it Larry, your the one spewing insults here.
>
> I was mocking Eric for pointing out ho
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Judah McAuley
>>> wrote:
>>> If you treat all police officers as if they are one of t
Actually, I use the external SMTP server.. So it gets sent out as
whatever account I used to send it. :)
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> I thought about using multiple email accounts...but it is really too
> much trouble.
>
> And Gmail never sends the alternate email as the Rep
I thought about using multiple email accounts...but it is really too
much trouble.
And Gmail never sends the alternate email as the Reply To account either.
So someone just clicks Reply and sees the email address you were
logged into Gmail with.
It's kinda silly that way.
~~
>The choice between Obama and Palin is a laughable one.
I agree. The obvious choice would be to vote third party in such an
election.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> Maybe its a bit idealistic and naive, but if I am refused a job offer
> from a company because of the opinions I expressed on this or other
> lists, odds are they are not a company I would want to work for
> anyway.
Amen to that. I mean, I
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Sisk, Kris wrote:
>
> Someone call Satan and ask if it's snowing...
>
> Seriously though, like I said earlier, I'm polite to officers. You can
> be respectful and politely decline to answer questions.
I agree. And that is a lot of the 'coaching' I was referring
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>> If you treat all police officers as if they are one of the 'bad' or
>> 'corrupt' ones, even a 'good' one might be put off by
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Medic wrote:
>
> That's one of the things I like about Scott. He's all like "Yeah I said it.
> So what?"
Thank you kind sir.
One of the greatest compliments I ever received was from Charlie
Griefer. We met face to face a few years back at CFunited. After the
co
Someone call Satan and ask if it's snowing...
Seriously though, like I said earlier, I'm polite to officers. You can
be respectful and politely decline to answer questions.
Going back to the original start of this discussion, I think the only
real mistake the guy in the airport made was saying '
Maybe its a bit idealistic and naive, but if I am refused a job offer
from a company because of the opinions I expressed on this or other
lists, odds are they are not a company I would want to work for
anyway.
There is nothing I have ever said here that I would be ashamed or
embarrassed of (even
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Judah McAuley wrote:
> If you treat all police officers as if they are one of the 'bad' or
> 'corrupt' ones, even a 'good' one might be put off by your attitude.
> There is a way to protect your rights, even
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:37 AM, G Money wrote:
> >
> >
> > Oh hell no...no way. See, unlike you, my thinking is not set in stone.
>
> Of course your thoughts aren't carved in stone, they still haven't
> given them all to you.
>
Who's "they"?
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> I think that you may be not understanding the context in which Kris
> was stating this. What he's trying to say (at least how I take it) is
> equivalent to the recommended practice for handling guns: always
> assume that a gun is loaded a
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Sisk, Kris wrote:
>
>>I think you are back stepping a little, or maybe just clarifying your
> position.
>
>>Pretty sure it was you who made a comment earlier that was similar to
> 'I assume all cops are bad until proven otherwise'.
>
> Yes, that was a very poor c
If you act like all officers are corrupt then even a good cop could
become unpleasant.
Try starting with all are good and work on weeding out the bad
when you get to them.
It'll do us all better.
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> I think that you may be not underst
Oh.. I do the same. This account has a history and such, but the
account I apply for jobs with have my real name and doesn't link up to
this account (well, at least not at first lookthrough).
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> Sock puppet accounts can be great for that (an
Only if you're posting through gmail. :)
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <
zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sometimes your post shows up on google even before you post it.
>
>
> On Sep 20, 2010, at 10:24 AM, Michael Dinowitz wrote:
>
> >
> > And rightfully so. They in
That right there is pure gold.
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Judah McAuley wrote:
> The same is true with police officers. You could be dealing with the
> nicest, most ethical, caring police officer in the world, in which
> case everything is going to be fine. Or you could be dealing with an
Sock puppet accounts can be great for that (and amusing). I'm too lazy
for anonymity though.
Cheers Phillip,
Judah
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 8:24 AM, Michael Dinowitz
wrote:
>
> And rightfully so. They index this site within minutes of a new post.
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Phillip
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:37 AM, G Money wrote:
>
>
> Oh hell no...no way. See, unlike you, my thinking is not set in stone.
Of course your thoughts aren't carved in stone, they still haven't
given them all to you.
> However, i can tell you right now, if you put up Sarah Palin..HA! Sorry,
Exactly. Thank you Judah.
-Original Message-
From: Judah McAuley [mailto:ju...@wiredotter.com]
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 10:45 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: US Man refuses to answer Immigration questions.Apparently,
he was right.
I think that you may be not understanding the
>I think you are back stepping a little, or maybe just clarifying your
position.
>Pretty sure it was you who made a comment earlier that was similar to
'I assume all cops are bad until proven otherwise'.
Yes, that was a very poor choice of words on my part. Looking at it now
it doesn't accuratel
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> I think you are back stepping a little, or maybe just clarifying your
> position.
>
> Pretty sure it was you who made a comment earlier that was similar to
> 'I assume all cops are bad until proven otherwise'.
>
> There is a way to protect
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Phillip Vector
wrote:
> I would not be willing to assume all cops are bad as default...
Kris would, and that is my point. Here is a snippet from earlier in
the thread, the first part is from me, the response is from Kris.
>> I guess 'innocent until proven gui
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Sam wrote:
> Yet you want/think they deserve to stay?
>
Oh hell no...no way. See, unlike you, my thinking is not set in stone.
However, i can tell you right now, if you put up Sarah Palin..HA! Sorry,
i just can't think about it without laughing.
> And I
That was meant for Kris. :D
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Phillip Vector
wrote:
>
> I'm clarifying my position. It's still early here on the west coast. :)
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>>
>> I think you are back stepping a little, or maybe just clarifying your
>>
I'm clarifying my position. It's still early here on the west coast. :)
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> I think you are back stepping a little, or maybe just clarifying your
> position.
~|
Order the Ado
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:28 AM, G Money wrote:
>
> TONS of issues with current Democrat leaders.
Yet you want/think they deserve to stay?
> Your poll is hilarious. I wonder what those same independents would have to
> say about Caribou Barbie (her official name, from now onlove it).
And
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> Nice try Phil. I never mentioned anything about the process one needs
> to go through when they are unemployed.
I know. I did. But it's the same concept.
> People cheat the system. I have seen it, more times than I care to remember.
Agree
Sometimes your post shows up on google even before you post it.
On Sep 20, 2010, at 10:24 AM, Michael Dinowitz wrote:
>
> And rightfully so. They index this site within minutes of a new post.
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Phillip Vector
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Why... Thank you. :)
>>
You and a few others as well. Do a search on it and you'll be surprised at
the results. They even have a doll.
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Caribou Barbie is a term I made up because I refuse to say her name on
> the web and give her more weight in the search engines. I
I think you are back stepping a little, or maybe just clarifying your position.
Pretty sure it was you who made a comment earlier that was similar to
'I assume all cops are bad until proven otherwise'.
There is a way to protect your rights and NOT have this attitude.
Which I guess is also part o
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> But you have no issues with the current Democrat leaders?
>
TONS of issues with current Democrat leaders.
Your poll is hilarious. I wonder what those same independents would have to
say about Caribou Barbie (her official name, from now onlove
And rightfully so. They index this site within minutes of a new post.
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Phillip Vector
wrote:
>
> Why... Thank you. :)
>
> Though most of the time, I'll be lurking. I still fear Google. :)
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 8:03 AM, Erika L. Rich wrote:
> >
> > **OMG.
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:10 AM, G Money wrote:
>
> The choice between Obama and Palin is a laughable one.
Good you keep laughing while we swear in a new president.
> Independents, you
> know...those of us who decide electionsoverwhelmingly supported Obama
> against one of the GOP's most a
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
