ColdFusion 9.01 can work with multiple datasources in ORM.
--
Regards,
Andrew Scott
WebSite: http://www.andyscott.id.au/
Google+: http://plus.google.com/108193156965451149543
-Original Message-
From: Tom (J7 Group) [mailto:t...@j7group.net]
Sent: Wednesday, 21 September 2011 1:29 AM
No...Clinton said we didn't have enough evidence to convict him so it would
be a waste of time, money and potentially, lives to go and try to arrest him
at the time.
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 2:32 PM
To: cf-community
Subj
Actually...no he didn't...remember the link to al-Qaida was long since shown
to be false and that he was just as much a target of al-Qaida as we were.
They didn't like Hussein because he was a secular leader and did not impose
Sharia law in Iraq. Baathists and Wahabbists (sp?) are not friendly to
Actually that does have to do with evolution...we inherited diabetes from
Neandertals ...
-Original Message-
From: Larry Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 10:26 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: ron paul wins ca straw poll
Fine think that way, especi
Last year, mid October, I heard an odd sound outside and walked out
the front porch to notice a Tom and a Hen wandering down the sidewalk.
I recognized them as being escapees from the neighbor around the
corner. I have plenty of experience with chickens but wasn't quite
sure that the same approach
I'm not sure what the laws are out here about shipping, but I'll ask
the boy toy if he wants to wrestle one off the roof.
If you're my facebook friend, there are some photos of the turkeys in
one of my albums.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 6:53 PM, morchella
wrote:
>
> i would just like to taste a fr
i would just like to taste a fresh wild turkey. would not like to kill it.
any way you could through one in an ice packed box to ohio before
thanksgiving?
seriously, i would pay shipping. if you have 40, start feeding them some
sweet corn..
get them real comfy with you.
=]
why am i so food motivat
Sweet Jebus. That's a big bird.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> If you wanna come to California on a hunting trip, I have about 50
> huge wild turkeys that converge on my roof every morning. Some of
> them are nearly as tall as me. (4'11"). I would not cry if someone
> wa
If you wanna come to California on a hunting trip, I have about 50
huge wild turkeys that converge on my roof every morning. Some of
them are nearly as tall as me. (4'11"). I would not cry if someone
wanted them for dinner. Then I might actually get to sleep past dawn.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at
In reality I've bagged so few ducks that maybe I should consider putting
more lead into the air.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Medic wrote:
> Big guns. There's really nothing on that table that interests me though.
> I don't need to destroy a village, just take down a duck and eat it.
>
>
Big guns. There's really nothing on that table that interests me though.
I don't need to destroy a village, just take down a duck and eat it.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 7:04 PM, morchella wrote:
>
> shoulda gota saiga12
>
> https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/HMXOvCbtAcDpwpHo9S7WVg?feat=directli
shoulda gota saiga12
https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/HMXOvCbtAcDpwpHo9S7WVg?feat=directlink
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Arc
Nailed it.
Yeah, because Bush decided that since things were probably wrapped up in
Aafghanistan - the actual people that actually did attack us - he'd move on to
other objectives. And he got spanked and a lot US troops needlessly died.
That the exact same strategic mistake Hitler made with S
But that's like saying an iPhone is a fact but the description isn't.
Maybe the miss here is that a theory describes interaction and makes
predictions about other facts.
On Sep 20, 2011, at 1:58 PM, Larry Lyons wrote:
>
> There are two things goin on here, the THEORY of evolution and the
So we've backed down all the way from Weapons of Mass Destruction! to
"a task force to kill Americans". A task force, we might add, that had
no possibility of doing anything other thing other than bluster toward
its "goal".
Sam, this is why I think you are what is wrong with this country.
Persona
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Sam wrote:
> He set up a task force to kill Americans. That right there is enough
> for me. He was also two weeks away from producing them and very
> adamant about doing so as soon as the sanctions were lifted. Please do
> not dishonor those that served and died
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 4:44 PM, GMoney wrote:
>
> This is a difficult if not impossible question to answer, but how would you
> have felt if your son or daughter had been sent to Iraq and killed in the
> battle to disarm Iraq of the WMD's that he didn't have, and wasn't really
> that close to ha
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Or... you could think that when someone is constantly attacking and
> promising to do more harm do you ignore them or do you disarm them
> before larger wars are needed. We waited too long the first time so we
> jumped the gun a little the second.
Or... you could think that when someone is constantly attacking and
promising to do more harm do you ignore them or do you disarm them
before larger wars are needed. We waited too long the first time so we
jumped the gun a little the second. It did end up being a threat that
needed to be dealt wit
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Because in hindsight we know how urgent the threat was and you still
> don't think it was enough.
>
because i'm not going to apply what I know now, to what I knew then. And you
shouldn't either.
It's like you bent down to pick up a stick, and it
Because in hindsight we know how urgent the threat was and you still
don't think it was enough.
.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 4:03 PM, GMoney wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Sam wrote:
>
>>
>> So war is always wrong. You should support Paul.
>>
>
> Nope, I obviously didn't say that, wh
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> So war is always wrong. You should support Paul.
>
Nope, I obviously didn't say that, why would you make that leap? That's not
a very honest debate tactic.
I simply feel that a MUCH more urgent threat would be required to justify a
pre-emptive wa
So war is always wrong. You should support Paul.
.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 3:42 PM, GMoney wrote:
>
> HA! I doubt it...since OBL had already pulled off a couple of successful big
> time operations.
>
> But, if Clinton HAD suggested that OBL's operations to date did not warrant
> starting a two-
HA! I doubt it...since OBL had already pulled off a couple of successful big
time operations.
But, if Clinton HAD suggested that OBL's operations to date did not warrant
starting a two-front war in which thousands would be killed.he would
have been right.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Sam
That's probably what the Clinton team said about bin Laden.
.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 3:27 PM, GMoney wrote:
>
> something for your conservative bulletin board: YES, we should have risked
> thousand, maybe millions, of American lives and NOT invaded Iraq...because
> the chance that Saddam was
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Ah semantics. The reports states they were working on something
> similar to anthrax and the only possible reason was to use it to make
> anthrax. But technically it wasn't anthrax.
>
> It also stated many of BW scientists set up shop in local univ
Ah semantics. The reports states they were working on something
similar to anthrax and the only possible reason was to use it to make
anthrax. But technically it wasn't anthrax.
It also stated many of BW scientists set up shop in local universities
and did parallel research without explanations.
There are two things goin on here, the THEORY of evolution and the FACT of
evolution. The theory tries to explain the mechanism involved. That's the
scientific theory. The fact is that evolution happens, it is the change of
allels over time. That is reality.
>Very true. but evolution is one o
YOu really are into strange fantasies. This one is almost as good as "Precious
Bodily Fluids." Only slightly less wack.
I mean really don't you neo-cons ever stop? Or is your almost sexual obsession
with self jusification is all consuming for you. There are enough problems,
most of which you p
Sam, you tout the Duelfer Commission report as supporting your views
on 2001-era Iraq and yet you keep repeating lies directly contradicted
by that very same report.
On BW research in Iraq Universities:
"ISG is aware of BW-applicable research since 1996, but ISG judges it
was not conducted in co
Substantially fewer than died in the response.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> He set up a force to kill Americans and was working with terrorists
> and kept his BW research active in universities. Tell me how many
> Americans were supposed to die before we responded?
~
Romney couldn't beat McCain last time and Hunstman is more of a lefty
than McCain. Those are best case scenarios for you to keep your boy in
office.
And it looks like Hillary might be the one to beat.
.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Or nominating anyone but Romney or h
Yeah because I'll hold at all *tested* theories are fact.
Like all facts, new information may come to light that supersedes the old fact,
but it doesn't ever prove it wrong. It can't. That's the whole point of
testing.
So, yes, all tested scientific theories are fact.
On Sep 20, 2011, at
He set up a force to kill Americans and was working with terrorists
and kept his BW research active in universities. Tell me how many
Americans were supposed to die before we responded?
.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> I thought your point was that hussein's threat justi
And last week we discussed this and I mentioned this list:
http://www.toptenz.net/top-10-most-famous-scientific-theories-that-turned-out-to-be-wrong.php
Then I mentioned this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory
Essential criteria
- It is supported by many strands of evidence, rat
Or nominating anyone but Romney or huntsman. If perry or Bachman or any of
those other dolts were nominated Obama doesn't lose a state.
On Sep 20, 2011, at 11:35 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> Sadly, that's his only chance of getting re-elected.
>
> .
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Larry Lyon
I thought your point was that hussein's threat justified our invasion of iraq;
if so, I'm pointing out that it didn't and was a strategic blunder.
Were you making a different point?
On Sep 20, 2011, at 7:32 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> So you changed the goal post again?
>
> Whatever floats your bo
Yeah, you are correct.
I will now quibble even with people who don't want to call it a "fact"...and
i'll point out that it is an actual, measurable fact.
Cool, more reason to argue with people :)
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> Technically, evolution is a fact. You c
Technically, evolution is a fact. You can design and execute a test
that explicitly shows variation of traits from one generation to the
next in response to a selective force. You can map the frequency of
alleles and show the predicted adaptive traits as a changed frequency
in the studied populati
mmm well the essence of science is that it is not dogma, is what I hear you
saying. And any new evidence should of course be weighed. But -- what
Maureen said. They don't call it a theory until there's already a LOT of
evidence to support the model. Sure, something new COULD come to light that
wo
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Yes, but HOW did he do it? He's God, right? So he can use any tool
> at his disposal to carry out creation.
>
> "In the beginning, using the mechanism of evolution, a wee bit of
> terraforming and a really big bang, God created the heavens
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:10 AM, GMoney wrote:
>
> All theories need more testing.
>
> Science never stops testing...they never say "welp, that's the end of that!"
>
> (Course, that's exactly what Intelligent Design does.God did it. QED!)
Yes, but HOW did he do it? He's God, right? So he
According to the United States National Academy of Sciences,
Some scientific explanations are so well established that no new
evidence is likely to alter them. The explanation becomes a scientific
theory. In everyday language a theory means a hunch or speculation.
Not so in science. In science, th
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> the term "theory" has a very specific meaning in science. I am not sure
> which theory would need more testing. AFAIK it would not be considered a
> theory if it did.
>
All theories need more testing.
Science never stops testing...they never sa
the term "theory" has a very specific meaning in science. I am not sure
which theory would need more testing. AFAIK it would not be considered a
theory if it did.
If you're saying that there is a lot out there that we don't understand,
then fine. True. But I think your logic is a little fuzzy too
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> Actually, I'm saying many theories can be assumed to be facts, like
> evolution, while many are not. Then there's plenty in the middle that
> need more testing.
>
Sure, we treat them as facts, because for all intents and purposes..they
are.
But
Actually, I'm saying many theories can be assumed to be facts, like
evolution, while many are not. Then there's plenty in the middle that
need more testing.
Larry mumbled something about evolution and insulin as proof all
theories are facts.
.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:38 PM, GMoney wrote:
>
> We have an application that uses several data sources, and have
> read an article that says; Hibernate integration can work with only
> one data source within a given ColdFusion application.
> If this is the case, then is there a way around this?
Hi Tom, the 9.0.1 release now supports multiple
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> When did I ever say that?
>
> The issue is whether every scientific theory is fact. To take one
> theory and write the law of theory on that is stupid.
>
> We had this discussion and anyone with a clue realizes that not all
> scientific theories p
Sadly, that's his only chance of getting re-elected.
.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Larry Lyons wrote:
>
> By the time the republicon party has chosen it nominee they are going to be
> so damaged by the process that Obama may not need a working group to dig up
> the dirt on the candidate
When did I ever say that?
The issue is whether every scientific theory is fact. To take one
theory and write the law of theory on that is stupid.
We had this discussion and anyone with a clue realizes that not all
scientific theories prove to be true. That's why they are theories and
not laws.
oh god.
You're making me side with Larry. But seriously, Sam, you seem to be saying
that the theory of evolution is just something somebody thought up one
Friday night after a few beers. I'm pretty sure that is the position that
Larry is trying to take issue with in his passive-aggressive and ped
WTF? Are you on mushrooms?
Are you saying all theories are fact and proof is evolution?
Sober up man and make a coherent statement so I can rip it apart properly.
.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Larry Lyons wrote:
>
> Fine think that way, especially when you get in an accident and need
>
>Wabbit season
Duck Season!
Wabbit!
Duck!
-
I'm going to have to watch that again.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=hou
By the time the republicon party has chosen it nominee they are going to be so
damaged by the process that Obama may not need a working group to dig up the
dirt on the candidate - the republicon party will have done the work for them.
> It's Obama/Biden vs Romney/Rubio
>
> The economy and "pea
Hi,
We have an application that uses several data sources, and have read an
article
(http://www.adobe.com/devnet/coldfusion/articles/coldfusion9_orm.html) that
says; Hibernate integration can work with only one data source within a
given ColdFusion application.
If this is the case, then
Fine think that way, especially when you get in an accident and need
antibiotics for instance. Or if you develop diabetes (cannot have anything
based on evolution you know). Such stupidity may kill you, its the collateral
damage you'd be causing that is worrisome.
>You just refuse to learn?
>
Unlike American elections, the reality of scientific theories do not depend on
a popularity or a beauty contest. As Galileo said as he kissed the Pope's foot
after recanting the heliocentric theory of the solar system, "It still moves."
In other words despite wishes to the contrary, reality is.
That is rich, neither Huntsman or McCain not a republican? simply amazing that
people actually think that. The sheer mind boggling nature of that statement.
The inmates have truly taken over the asylum.
>That's because he's not a republican.
>
>We put up a dem last cycle to please the foaming
>> Damn Justin I wish I knew. I was there as well. It would have
>> been cool to havea couple of beer. perhaps next year.
>
>Indeed! If there's one thing I took away from this conference, it's
>that I need to attend more conferences. :)
>
>
It looks like RIA Con will be on again next year. That
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 1:56 AM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> >
> > If he doesn't accept the theory then he's a whack job.
> >
>
> Irrelevant, since a majority (61%) of the Republican Party agrees with
> Paul.
> If it's delusional, that makes it
We got nobody running against a guy that will barely get his own
party's nomination.
Sad.
.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 2:40 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> It's Obama/Biden vs Romney/Rubio
>
> The economy and "peak" strategy determines the winner. At this point I'm
> voting for Romney.
>
~~
http://www.gallup.com/poll/21811/american-beliefs-evolution-vs-bibles-explanation-human-origins.aspx
Same numbers for all Americans. Wonder why Gallup re-packaged it as a
Republican only thing.
.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> strike the 61%, here is the full data, th
You just refuse to learn?
Stubborn fool.
.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 2:37 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> If he doesn't accept the theory then he's a whack job.
>
> Scientifare theories are facts and never proven wrong only superseded, I.e.,
> the theory of general relativity superseded newtons theor
That's because he's not a republican.
We put up a dem last cycle to please the foaming mouths and they still
chose the clown with no experience or plan.
That won't happen again.
.
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Huntsman is one of the few Republicans I would even consider
So you changed the goal post again?
Whatever floats your boat dude.
.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 2:05 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Don't worry, there's simply no debate here.
>
> It's like arguing that Hitler didn't make a mistake when he split his forces
> to go after Leningrad and stalingrad at t
It doesn't matter who the majority of the Republicans agree with, it
matters who the majority of the voters agree with. He might get the
Repub nomination, although that is doubtful, but he is not electable,
and his stance on evolution is one of the reasons. Although it is not
as damaging as his s
strike the 61%, here is the full data, though:
http://www.gallup.com/poll/27847/majority-republicans-doubt-theory-evolution.aspx
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
>>
>> If he doesn't accept the theory then he's a w
68 matches
Mail list logo
