So, I ran across this today:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jul/10/chicago-lawmaker-send-national-guard-stop-violence/
I like this one sentence:
She also asked that the governor appoint a task force to guide the
behavior of the National Guard. We dont want them to have us fearing the
Yes!
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Erika L. Rich wrote:
>
> Groan ...
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:08 PM, William Bowen >wrote:
>
> >
> > Hard to count, even though they're all in a neat little line...
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Cameron Childress > >wrote:
> >
> > >
>
Groan ...
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:08 PM, William Bowen wrote:
>
> Hard to count, even though they're all in a neat little line...
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Cameron Childress >wrote:
>
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:00 PM, William Bowen wrote:
> >
> > > I love a brazillian as
Hard to count, even though they're all in a neat little line...
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:00 PM, William Bowen wrote:
>
> > I love a brazillian as much as the next guy, but that's a bit extreme...
>
>
> "How many are in a brazillion
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:00 PM, William Bowen wrote:
> I love a brazillian as much as the next guy, but that's a bit extreme...
"How many are in a brazillion anyway?" said the blonde.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anth
I love a brazillian as much as the next guy, but that's a bit extreme...
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
>
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/dcunited/brazilian-fans-kill-and-quarter-referee-who-stabbed-football-player-to-death/2013/07/06/e4dbd338-e672-11e2-97c2-eee
There are just so many things wrong with this, I scarcely know where to
start.
As a football (American) and basketball official,I can say without
hesitation that if I felt I needed to bring a knife to a game I was
officiating, I would reconsider doing the game.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:50 AM,
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> talk about a reaction to a bad call...
That's what you get for letting a sport end it's games as a tie.
-Cameron
...
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
htt
Seems reasonable to me. What's the problem?
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
>
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/dcunited/brazilian-fans-kill-and-quarter-referee-who-stabbed-football-player-to-death/2013/07/06/e4dbd338-e672-11e2-97c2-eee7eab7397e_singlePage.html?t
http://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/dcunited/brazilian-fans-kill-and-quarter-referee-who-stabbed-football-player-to-death/2013/07/06/e4dbd338-e672-11e2-97c2-eee7eab7397e_singlePage.html?tid=obnetwork
talk about a reaction to a bad call...
~~~
No, they did review 12,000 papers but eliminated 7930 for not having an
opinion. Of that only 64 explicitly endorsed the quantitative hypothesis to
the effect that humans are the primary cause of current warming.
Which leads to: "their stated conclusion is incorrect."
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2
It is not accidental. It is as well crafted a disinformation campaign as
any used against enemies in warfare, with as delicate a touch as the best
marketing campaigns.
a LOT of time and effort and brain power is used to create these
misconceptions.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Vivec wrote:
It is alarming that in a democratic society the public's knowledge is so
grossly incorrect on the key issues affecting society. How is it possible
to correctly select candidates, and to support the right policies if you
don't know what's going on?
And on the other side, HOW did the public gain su
So what you are saying is that the authors lied, and did not review 12,000
papers. They only reviewed 64.
Is that what you're saying?
On 10 July 2013 09:17, Sam wrote:
>
> What are you saying? You can't read or you refuse to?
>
>
> http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/06/24/quantifying-the-consensu
What are you saying? You can't read or you refuse to?
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/06/24/quantifying-the-consensus-on-global-warming-in-the-literature-a-comment/
Cook *et al. *(2013) stated that abstracts of nearly all papers expressing
an opinion on climate change endorsed consensus, which,
Also Sam endlessly repeating mere assertions does not constitute a
refutation. Its an argument mainly used by children, not knowledgeable
people.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> but sam you did not. You used a flawed argument and a straw man. Then you
> had a verbal tem
but sam you did not. You used a flawed argument and a straw man. Then you
had a verbal temper tantrum.
You did not demonstrate that the study was too flawed.
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> I ridiculed this junk science back when it came out. Did you suddenly
> forget?
>
> Here
No it doesn't.
There is no scientific proof global warming is caused by man, to the
contrary. The pause in temperature rise during the increase of co2 would
seem to suggest otherwise.
But who cares about actual science when you can make shit up and earn a
bundle.
.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:
18 matches
Mail list logo
