I still prefer the FN FAL Big accurate and can punch a hole in most things.
The real drawback is that on auto it can be difficult to control. However
Imbel seems to have solved that one.
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Timothy Heald wrote:
>
> 7.62 is still in wide use, machine guns, sniper r
So this recent article (http://tinyurl.com/jvrx67q) got me to thinking
about how well Sprint is going to do in the future. I am currently a Sprint
customer and I am very unhappy with them, simply because their service on
Fort Benning (where I live, work and play) is shitty, and Sprint recognizes
t
ishma = saiga ak varient
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 1:03 PM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> Is Ishmal the long one for the SVD or a funky name for .x .39?
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Paul Ihrig wrote:
>
>>
>> love 7.62 Ishma!
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Larry C. Lyons
>> wrote:
>> >
Is Ishmal the long one for the SVD or a funky name for .x .39?
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Paul Ihrig wrote:
>
> love 7.62 Ishma!
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Larry C. Lyons
> wrote:
> >
> > hey I wrote it off the top of my head. I still prefer 7.62 round but that
> > really da
My friend thinks I'm crazy
Haha
On Jan 12, 2014 1:02 AM, "Michael Dinowitz"
wrote:
>
> I was getting off the train when I noticed a button on a young woman's
> coat. I asked to read it and it said
> "Sh!t's about to get real"
> I smiled, thanked her, and walked away. I hear her tell her compani
7.62 is still in wide use, machine guns, sniper rifles, designated
marksmen. There's a whole class of M-16 variants built on 7.62, and some
M-14s and lots of Remington 700s.
That's without going into the 240b and the SF Gatling gun, that shit is
sick right there.
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:00
love 7.62 Ishma!
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> hey I wrote it off the top of my head. I still prefer 7.62 round but that
> really dates me.
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:43 AM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
>>
>> 5.56?
>> On Jan 13, 2014 11:19 AM, "Larry C. Lyons" wrote:
hey I wrote it off the top of my head. I still prefer 7.62 round but that
really dates me.
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:43 AM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> 5.56?
> On Jan 13, 2014 11:19 AM, "Larry C. Lyons" wrote:
>
> >
> > In the 90's the Swedes though that the 5.52 NATO round was too inhumane,
> > w
well you also have to admit there is such a thing called the Geneva
Conventions.
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Bruce Sorge wrote:
>
> And the only reason that I can see that we won't be authorized to use these
> rounds is because of the philosophy that we want to injure an enemy
> combatan
5.56?
On Jan 13, 2014 11:19 AM, "Larry C. Lyons" wrote:
>
> In the 90's the Swedes though that the 5.52 NATO round was too inhumane,
> with its shattering on bone impact. So they redesigned the round to be more
> humane. Only thing was in tests it turned out to be much more nastier,
> tumbling
In the 90's the Swedes though that the 5.52 NATO round was too inhumane,
with its shattering on bone impact. So they redesigned the round to be more
humane. Only thing was in tests it turned out to be much more nastier,
tumbling on impact and causing about 3 or 4 times the damage as the
standard
We can't use hollow points, frangible rounds, or flachettes.
Rules of land warfare or the geneva convention.
Since it breaks up I'd imagine these will be off limits as well.
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Bruce Sorge wrote:
>
> And the only reason that I can see that we won't be authorize
And the only reason that I can see that we won't be authorized to use these
rounds is because of the philosophy that we want to injure an enemy
combatant so that we can essentially take out two or three at the same time
(the injured combatant and then the one or two it takes to carry him away).
To
Different not correct.
On 1/12/14, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> Soldiers aren't permitted to use these kinds of ammunition. To be honest
> the more extreme rounds are in reality more merciful. The jacketed rounds
> we use often just poke holes in people. Death can take a long time and
> often be from
Soldiers aren't permitted to use these kinds of ammunition. To be honest
the more extreme rounds are in reality more merciful. The jacketed rounds
we use often just poke holes in people. Death can take a long time and
often be from secondary causes like infection.
If the idea is the death of t
So what's your answer to this? Other than not ever having another war. A
Realistic answer. What do you propose to do in order for the allies have an
advantage over their enemies? I think this is pretty cool really.
Sent from my iPhone 4S.
> On Jan 7, 2014, at 9:23 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
>
> h
16 matches
Mail list logo
