>
>
> This discussion just turned into a childish rant.
>
>
No, that happened when you brought ebola into the conversation.
--
Scott Stroz
---
You can make things happen, you can watch things happen or you can wonder
what the f*&k happened. - Cpt. Phil Harris
http://xkcd.com/386/
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> 'Nobody' wanted Obamacare, and yet, he was re-elected. Maybe you have a
> different definition for the word 'nobody'
That was two years ago, before Obamacare kicked in. Now we know how bad it is.
> And, whatever credibility you may have had
Indeed. I used to work with a guy who 'played' the market - not a day
trader, he was trying to build a nest egg for when he retired (which was
quite a big egg when he did retire). One thing he would frequently do is,
when there was a dip in the market, he would invest more money in certain
stocks
'Nobody' wanted Obamacare, and yet, he was re-elected. Maybe you have a
different definition for the word 'nobody'
And, whatever credibility you may have had left you just pissed away by
bringing up ebola. More Americans have been married to Kim Kardashian than
have died from Ebola, yet it was ma
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
> Can't have prosperity without the occasional recession. It's just the way
> it works. We can only hope the former lasts longer than the latter.
>
And then there's also the concept of, "buy low, sell high"
Until Later!
C. Hatton Humphrey
htt
Nobody wanted Obamacare, nobody wants the Dream Act. Those are
probably the two most important issues this cycle. There are dozens of
others like IRS, Fast and Furious, Ebola, Benghazi, Iraq, Serria,
Israel, Iran...but the former two are what drove people to vote out
the traitors.
On Thu, Nov 6
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 11:41 AM, William Bowen
wrote:
>
> All of it leads to a crash. It's the nature of the beast.
>
>
Can't have prosperity without the occasional recession. It's just the way
it works. We can only hope the former lasts longer than the latter.
--
Scott Stroz
---
I don't recall you having this same attitude when the midterms in Bush's
second term went the same way, but for the democrats. Or when president
Obama was elected...twice.
Or, is it only 'the will of the people' when Republicans win?
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> Yes, and the
All of it leads to a crash. It's the nature of the beast.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 7:35 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> Doesn't it lead to a crash?
>
> .
>
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:55 AM, GMoney wrote:
> >
> > Obamacare is not very popular.
> >
> > I think Sam's mostly right. GOP didn't bullshit anybody, t
Yes, and the side that was in power went against the will of the
people. And now they're gone.
.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Sam wrote:
>
>>
>> We've had no compromise for six years and the people are done.
>
>
> Yep, and both sides
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> We've had no compromise for six years and the people are done.
Yep, and both sides of the aisle get the blame there. Neither side was
willing to 'negotiate in good faith'.
--
Scott Stroz
---
You can make things happen, you can watch
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> I read that differently. It's saying the people have spoken and the
> want to try a different direction. If the new Senate caves in to
> Democrats demands then they are not fulfilling the promises that got
> them elected. They're saying, pass bills
Doesn't it lead to a crash?
.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:55 AM, GMoney wrote:
>
> Obamacare is not very popular.
>
> I think Sam's mostly right. GOP didn't bullshit anybody, they asked them a
> question"You like this?"
>
> Voters said "Nope!"
>
> On the bright sideinvest now. Since 1945,
Obamacare is not very popular.
I think Sam's mostly right. GOP didn't bullshit anybody, they asked them a
question"You like this?"
Voters said "Nope!"
On the bright sideinvest now. Since 1945, the stock market's largest
gains have occurred when we have a Democratic president, and a GOP
Tax revenue is up $3 trillion dollars a year and yet the deficit is
1/2 a trillion. Spending is out of control and needs to be reversed.
.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> When one party preferred to shut down the entire government rather than
> budge on a position...then yeah t
We've had no compromise for six years and the people are done. It's
time Washington worked for the people. The problem is once Republicans
get the power they get almost as bad.
.
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
>>
>> That's like telling a Bully who's been thrashing you ever
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
> Their tactical wisdom of misinformation and opposition with no regard for
> anything else has worked perfectly so far.
> The aim is not to do anything for America, the aim is to get the
> presidency, the house, the senate by any means necessary.
T
When one party preferred to shut down the entire government rather than
budge on a position...then yeah there can be no compromise.
And to not realise that and move to suit is just...I'm not sure that's
proper leadership.
Not knowing when to fight, or that you are even in a fight.
On 5 November
I read that differently. It's saying the people have spoken and the
want to try a different direction. If the new Senate caves in to
Democrats demands then they are not fulfilling the promises that got
them elected. They're saying, pass bills that the people want even
though the dem's will block t
19 matches
Mail list logo
