Maybe "most voters", but certainly not "most Americans"
Population in 2004: 285,700,000+
Citizens in 2004: 215,000,000+
*Eligible voters: 200,000,000+
**Registered voters: 142,070,000+
Voters 126,000,000
**Bush votes: 62,040,610 (50.78%)
*
So he got more of the popular vote in 2004, but the only "
>I'm guessing most Americans would want a commander-in-chief to know
>these things.
and "most Americans" voted for George Bush
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Ge
> RoMunn wrote:
> none of this stuff matters.
So not understanding the facts on ground in Iraq is ok? Because
McCain doesn't seem to know the difference between Sunni and Shiites,
between Iraq and Iran, whether Iraq shares a border with Pakistan,
when the surge happened, or what it's metrics were
none of this stuff matters. how about the obama gaffe in israel,
referring to "his committee" (meaning the banking committee, of which
he is not a member). voters care about issues.
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 8:22 PM, Gruss wrote:
>> gg wrote:
>> On Tuesday evening, McCain falsely claimed that the do
> gg wrote:
> On Tuesday evening, McCain falsely claimed that the downturn in
> violence in Iraq's Anbar province was a result of the surge, when in
> fact the surge began months afterward.
Wow, and it turns out that McCain should've known this if only because
he'd already commented on it a year e
The major Sunni sheik who John McCain said was protected by the surge
and subsequently helped lead the Anbar Awakening, was actually
assassinated by an al-Qaeda led group in midst of the surge.
On Tuesday evening, McCain falsely claimed that the downturn in
violence in Iraq's Anbar province was a
