RE: Apple goes mobile

2007-01-12 Thread Nick McClure
TED] > Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 8:56 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Apple goes mobile > > > Nick wrote: > > The treo 750 is nice. > > I have a 6700 (VZW or PPC), and I really like it, but when I saw this > things features I said, "a, yeah!

Re: Apple goes mobile

2007-01-12 Thread Gruss Gott
> Nick wrote: > The treo 750 is nice. I have a 6700 (VZW or PPC), and I really like it, but when I saw this things features I said, "a, yeah!" As soon as version 2 comes out I'll get one. The software is totally killer. This product is going to go gang busters if they can get more carriers

RE: Apple goes mobile

2007-01-12 Thread Nick McClure
treo 750 is nice. I'd like to get one of those blackjacks. The MS rep was showing it off, and it is nice. > -Original Message- > From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 11:44 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Apple goes mobile &g

Re: Apple goes mobile

2007-01-11 Thread Gruss Gott
> Chuck wrote: > heh. remember the screens on the first nanos? they'd scratch if you > so much as looked at them. In these pics and descriptions this phone looks totally kick ass: http://www.kcra.com/technology/10717154/detail.html ~~

Re: Apple goes mobile

2007-01-10 Thread Charlie Griefer
heh. remember the screens on the first nanos? they'd scratch if you so much as looked at them. Apple didn't want to acknowledge the problem at first, but eventually did after much public outcry. Nobody's perfect :) On 1/10/07, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Um, you mean unlike the la

Re: Apple goes mobile

2007-01-10 Thread Robert Munn
Um, you mean unlike the lawsuits, recalls, and rebate programs over the early iPods? On 1/9/07, Larry Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >I am already tired of this news. I can't wait to hear about the product > >recalls, the threats of class action lawsuits, and the eventual out of > court > >s

Re: Apple goes mobile

2007-01-10 Thread Jerry Johnson
But you had problems with the xbox. That is a hardware problem (which is what I thought the topic was). We were not talking (I don't think) about the service after a hardware problem, just the reliability of the hardware itself. My first xbox had a cd-rom read error. So I sent it in to get fixed.

RE: Apple goes mobile

2007-01-10 Thread Nick McClure
ED] > Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 9:10 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Apple goes mobile > > Can you say xbox? can you sy xbox 360? can you say optical mouse? I've > had > more hardware failures from MS hardware than I have from all other > companies > combi

Re: Apple goes mobile

2007-01-10 Thread William Bowen
> Can you say xbox? hrmmm... I bought an xbox exactly 32 days before the initial price break I think it was $299 It still hums along no problems whatsoever. They sent me a new power cable in October of 2005 (I think) but that's the only issue I've had--and that wasn't even an issue because I don'

Re: Apple goes mobile

2007-01-10 Thread Jerry Johnson
Can you say xbox? can you sy xbox 360? can you say optical mouse? I've had more hardware failures from MS hardware than I have from all other companies combined in my life. (Course, I bought the 360 anyway.) On 1/10/07, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes, they did. As for reliability

RE: Apple goes mobile

2007-01-10 Thread Nick McClure
You mean Dell and Apple :) Apple did a recall on iPod and laptop batteries. They were using the same laptop batteries from Sony Dell was using. > -Original Message- > From: Larry Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You mean like Dell. Over all Apple systems have lead the industry in > re

RE: Apple goes mobile

2007-01-10 Thread Nick McClure
Yes, they did. As for reliability of MS stuff, this is the first time they've done a similar device with the Zune. They other hardware products like keyboards and mice have been the best one I've ever had. > -Original Message- > From: William Bowen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Why. App

RE: Apple goes mobile

2007-01-10 Thread Nick McClure
Too reliable? What about the lawsuit against apple for purposefully making products that would break after the warranty was up so people would have to upgrade? > -Original Message- > From: Larry Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Why. Apple systems have been extremely reliable and durabl

Re: Apple goes mobile

2007-01-10 Thread Larry Lyons
>> Why. Apple systems have been extremely reliable and durable. > >didn't apple's ipod batteries get recalled? > >Not that I am arguning that M$ equipment is any better... > >:-\ >-- >will > You mean like Dell. Over all Apple systems have lead the industry in reliability and consumer satisfactio

Re: Apple goes mobile

2007-01-09 Thread Jerry Johnson
I'm still running on the battery I got with mine in 1999. Still charges fine. On 1/9/07, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Why. Apple systems have been extremely reliable and durable. > > didn't apple's ipod batteries get recalled? > > Not that I am arguning that M$ equipment is any b

Re: Apple goes mobile

2007-01-09 Thread William Bowen
> Why. Apple systems have been extremely reliable and durable. didn't apple's ipod batteries get recalled? Not that I am arguning that M$ equipment is any better... :-\ -- will "If my life weren't funny, it would just be true; and that would just be unacceptable." - Carrie Fisher

Re: Apple goes mobile

2007-01-09 Thread Larry Lyons
>I am already tired of this news. I can't wait to hear about the product >recalls, the threats of class action lawsuits, and the eventual out of court >settlement and rebate program to pick up an Apple iPhone 2.0. Why. Apple systems have been extremely reliable and durable. Unlike M$ based crud.

Re: Apple goes mobile

2007-01-09 Thread Gruss Gott
> Gel wrote: > That device is AWESOME!!! So, I continue to insist: IT'S THE SOFTWARE. Apple is a software company and their products are all about software wrapped in a sleek package. (full disclosure: I bought apple at $14 per share pre split ... BWAH HA HA!) ~~

Re: Apple goes mobile

2007-01-09 Thread Todd Ashworth
I see you haven't changed much ;) - Original Message - From: "Vivec" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 6:08 PM Subject: Re: Apple goes mobile > H MG! > THAT WIN!!! > That device is AWESOME!!! &g

Re: Apple goes mobile

2007-01-09 Thread Vivec
0_0 WelL I can see why they went out of business. I never heard of them! Looks like multitouch thoughbut not the onscreen graphic touch the picture and move it type. I mean . CAN YOU IMAGINE THE APPLICATIONS FOR INTERACTIVE PORN!! YEAH BABYYY!!! I can Make em shake ^_^ hee hee h

Re: Apple goes mobile

2007-01-09 Thread Casey Dougall
I think fingerworks keyboards were the first multitouch interfaces... I haven't seen anything beond that which would allow multitouch. They even made a model for the PowerBook. Not in business anymore but their website is still up. http://fingerworks.com/ Casey > Multitouch interface!!! This is

Re: Apple goes mobile

2007-01-09 Thread Robert Munn
I am already tired of this news. I can't wait to hear about the product recalls, the threats of class action lawsuits, and the eventual out of court settlement and rebate program to pick up an Apple iPhone 2.0. On 1/9/07, Bruce Sorge wrote: > > http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16542805/ > > -- > Bruce

Re: Apple goes mobile

2007-01-09 Thread Vivec
H MG! THAT WIN!!! That device is AWESOME!!! OOOHHHMG!! Multitouch interface!!! This is the first commercial implementation of the technology! Remember me and some others posted video of the system in action at MIT or somewhere like that!?? Its hit market!! OOO.M.G

RE: Apple goes mobile

2007-01-09 Thread Nick McClure
Aww, that really sucks, I really wanted to see those two battle it out in court. > -Original Message- > From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 3:47 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Apple goes mobile > > Cisco Systems has

Re: Apple goes mobile

2007-01-09 Thread Jerry Johnson
y Dougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 3:15 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: Apple goes mobile > > > > Man, that's already old news! LOL Does look really sweet th

RE: Apple goes mobile

2007-01-09 Thread Nick McClure
I'm just waiting for the Cisco lawsuit. > -Original Message- > From: Casey Dougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 3:15 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Apple goes mobile > > Man, that's already old news! LOL Does look real

Re: Apple goes mobile

2007-01-09 Thread Bruce Sorge
I know that Jobs mentioned it earlier, but now it appears that is is more than just hype and will be a reality very soon. I will not get one though since I use Nextel, but if I were a Cingular customer, I might have looked into it. It is pretty slick though. On 1/9/07, Casey Dougall <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Apple goes mobile

2007-01-09 Thread Casey Dougall
Man, that's already old news! LOL Does look really sweet though. Too bad they locked into agreements with 1 carrier. http://www.apple.com/iphone/ On 1/9/07, Bruce Sorge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16542805/ > > -- > Bruce Sorge >

Apple goes mobile

2007-01-09 Thread Bruce Sorge
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16542805/ -- Bruce Sorge ~| Create robust enterprise, web RIAs. Upgrade & integrate Adobe Coldfusion MX7 with Flex 2 http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/co