http://iraqthemodel.blogspot.com/
- a really good political blog from a Baghdad resident, probably the most
in-depth coverage I have seen of the political situation.
http://baghdadgirl.blogspot.com/
- written by a 14 year old girl who loves cats. Nothing earth-shaking, it's
just nice to see that
ies I watched last weekend),
> you can just subscribe to the "Professional Feed"; you could even grab the
> straight CF feed if you wanted.
>
> (Of course, if you want the whole shebang, it's out there for you )
>
> At 08:05 AM 1/20/2006, you wrote:
> >Subject: B
straight CF feed if you wanted.
(Of course, if you want the whole shebang, it's out there for you )
At 08:05 AM 1/20/2006, you wrote:
>Subject: Blogs
>From: "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:06:16 -0500
>Thread:
>http://www.h
ass one I sent to the list.
> > >
> > > She got an A and her professor was very interested in her working with her
> > > more on the topic.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL P
gt; -Original Message-
> > From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 10:16 AM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: Blogs
> >
> > Well how about this, one of my areas of interest is in what's called
> >
or was very interested in her working with her
> more on the topic.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 10:16 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Blogs
>
> Well how about this, one of my
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 10:16 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Blogs
Well how about this, one of my areas of interest is in what's called
meta-analysis, thats a method of integrating independent research that
addresses a related set of questions. I wrote an app in CF
we'll see. My interests have gone from info processing and attention
to usability,HCI and statistical analysis/experimental design. So I'm
not sure how interested people here would be in those topics.
Speaking of which, anyone notice this:
Web users judge sites in the blink of an eye Potential r
ED]
> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 8:50 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Blogs
>
> Well I have some ideas I'd like to talk about, CF, web dev in general,
> usability, psychology and research, and I'm really impressed with
> Ray's blogCFC, having gone over i
Well I have some ideas I'd like to talk about, CF, web dev in general,
usability, psychology and research, and I'm really impressed with
Ray's blogCFC, having gone over it very closely. But at this point my
time is precious.
darn it I'm going to have to decide on how indecisive I want to be.
larr
no problem. and yes, i agree with kevin schmidt (fuck i hate saying that :))
id think people would dig your psych. stuff for shizzle.
tw
On 1/20/06, Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I might take you up on that Tony.
>
> larry
>
> On 1/20/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > cool. i
I might take you up on that Tony.
larry
On 1/20/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> cool. i think you should, and if you need help getting the code up
> or whatever, i can help, im always online working at night.
>
> peace
> tw
>
~~~
Hey Larry, don't bore us with another CF blog. I'd rather read about your
psychology and research!
My GF has me into psychology
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 8:50 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Blogs
W
Five minutes and I had Wordpress running. I used the fifteen minutes
before that to install Apache, MySQL, PHP, and Perl on my own box
using the XAMPP package. I'm honestly floored by how easy it was to
get all those running. Wordpress even auto-generated all the tables in
MySQL.
On 1/20/06, Larry
I'll be the little voice on your other shoulder that tells you NOT to do it
:)
Why trade the little valuable family time you've got, writing junk on a blog
that 1) no one will read and 2) you aren't that excited about anyway?
Don't give in Larry!
> cool. i think you should, and if you need h
gt; > >
> > > larry
> > >
> > > On 1/19/06, Jeffry Houser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > <http://www.jeffryhouser.com>
> > > >
> > > > I've had no luck getting the CF feed syndicated to
> > > > weblogs.macro
t; <http://www.jeffryhouser.com>
> > >
> > > I've had no luck getting the CF feed syndicated to
> > > weblogs.macromedia.com
> > > or to fullasagoog.com, though.
> > >
> > > At 04:07 PM 1/19/2006, you wrote:
> > > >Subject: Blo
ww.jeffryhouser.com>
> > >
> > > I've had no luck getting the CF feed syndicated to
> > > weblogs.macromedia.com
> > > or to fullasagoog.com, though.
> > >
> > > At 04:07 PM 1/19/2006, you wrote:
> > > >Subject: Blogs
>
jeffryhouser.com>
> >
> > I've had no luck getting the CF feed syndicated to weblogs.macromedia.com
> > or to fullasagoog.com, though.
> >
> > At 04:07 PM 1/19/2006, you wrote:
> > >Subject: Blogs
> > >From: "Chesty Puller" <[EMAI
TECTED]> wrote:
> <http://www.jeffryhouser.com>
>
> I've had no luck getting the CF feed syndicated to weblogs.macromedia.com
> or to fullasagoog.com, though.
>
> At 04:07 PM 1/19/2006, you wrote:
> >Subject: Blogs
> >From: "Chesty Puller" &l
<http://www.jeffryhouser.com>
I've had no luck getting the CF feed syndicated to weblogs.macromedia.com
or to fullasagoog.com, though.
At 04:07 PM 1/19/2006, you wrote:
>Subject: Blogs
>From: "Chesty Puller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Thu, 19 Jan
> No one will be given a pass from stupidity with the format I'm planning.
> Unless they pass.
fair enough
will
--
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
~|
Messa
No one will be given a pass from stupidity with the format I'm planning.
Unless they pass.
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: William Bowen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 11:30 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Blogs
I do remember ninedwarfs.com, yes.
I
I do remember ninedwarfs.com, yes.
I guess what I am trying to say is don't give them a pass simply
because you agree with them...
On 1/19/06, Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't you remember ninedwarfs.com? It wasn't about issues so much as
> idiocy. Which candidate does the dumbes
Don't you remember ninedwarfs.com? It wasn't about issues so much as
idiocy. Which candidate does the dumbest thing given a particular
situation. So unless the new site is actually about issues, there
would be no reason to really "test" the guys you want to look good
since the point is that nobody
> Obviously on issues I'll be tougher on the D's since I'm a conservative.
Interesting, I should think it would be the other way 'round. As a
conservative I'd think you'd want to make sure you're taking your
potential candidate to task for consistency, message and above all,
sticking with actual c
popular than the last one!
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: William Bowen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 10:50 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Blogs
> I've got both R's and D's to deal with.
Will you be equally tough on both?
will
---
"
> I've got both R's and D's to deal with.
Will you be equally tough on both?
will
---
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.
I'll be starting another blog for the Iowa caucuses here in the near future!
Not sure if I'll have as much success this time around, but I've got a new
idea that will probably stir up as much mess as it did last time. This time
though, I've got both R's and D's to deal with.
Kevin
~
yeah, mine is about 35% technical, 25% cf, and 100% off the wall usually :)
tw
On 1/19/06, Yves Arsenault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mine is at...
>
> www.cfyves.com
>
> I post about whatever
> :-)
>
> Yves
>
>
> On 1/19/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > www.revolutionwebdesign.com/bl
i throw sh*t here: http://single-dads.us
On 1/19/06, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So who on here has a blog? I need some reading material.
>
> me:
> misterbowen.blogspot.com
> lovesandfishes.blogspot.com
>
> my wife:
> girlscoutgonebad.blogspot.com
>
> --
> will
>
>
> "If my life w
Mine is at...
www.cfyves.com
I post about whatever
:-)
Yves
On 1/19/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> www.revolutionwebdesign.com/blog
>
> weeg blog
>
> :) tw
>
> On 1/19/06, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > So who on here has a blog? I need some reading material.
> >
>
www.revolutionwebdesign.com/blog
weeg blog
:) tw
On 1/19/06, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So who on here has a blog? I need some reading material.
>
> me:
> misterbowen.blogspot.com
> lovesandfishes.blogspot.com
>
> my wife:
> girlscoutgonebad.blogspot.com
>
> --
> will
>
>
> "I
> So who on here has a blog? I need some reading material.
me:
misterbowen.blogspot.com
lovesandfishes.blogspot.com
my wife:
girlscoutgonebad.blogspot.com
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
~
Just go to Blogger.com and click the Random Blogs button. If you don't
like what you get, then just click the Next Blog button in the upper
right.
You need to be a little careful of this though if you're at work. Our
building's social committee put a blog out there for events an
> Wow, I didn't think anybody paid attention to it. Not that I have that
> much
> to say.
That has never stopped anyone else from blogging :)
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:193176
Archives: http:
Myself I'm more into technical blogs. For non-tech stuff, well that's
what CF-Community is for.
larry
On 1/19/06, Chesty Puller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow, I didn't think anybody paid attention to it. Not that I have that much
> to say.
> I'm think
Wow, I didn't think anybody paid attention to it. Not that I have that much
to say.
I'm thinking about starting a blog on Monday bassed on my expereinces as a
FTE Microsoft Support Engineer. I'd like to do it on the Microsoft blog
site, if I can swing it.
I think I like blog
Well given that you haven't updated yours for a while, perhaps you
ought to get into some WRITING material
j/k of course. ;)
but I'll email you my list of CF-related blogs off list
larry
On 1/19/06, Chesty Puller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So who on here has a blog?
www.fullasagoog.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Chesty Puller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 9:39 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Blogs
>
> So who on here has a blog? I need some reading
So who on here has a blog? I need some reading material.
- Matt
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:193168
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffus
this comment assumes that the chilren in ps are learning adequately.
that goes along with it. Without that oversight then how do we know if
> the kids are learning adequately, or that what their are learning is
> acceptable?
>
> ynes
~
no, vouchers and NCLB are both because of Neil Bush.
Dana
> Taxes are not "your" money anymore once their collected. Vouchers are
> a political ploy to make people think that politicians are "doing"
> something.
>
~|
Find out
aha here we have it. Education as custodial care. I actually hve no problem
with this if it is needed and does not present itself as something else.
Childcare is an investment in labor resources.
>
> Without the schools that you pay for, kids would be on the streets at
> all times of day causing t
> > Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 9:46 AM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: Private High School orders students to take down blogs
> >
> > You're right and you're wrong. Schools do dread parental involvment. But
> > that's because parent&
call it hubris. If it succeeds and schools do not then imnsho opinion this
is a strong indication as to which methd is flawed.
You know what they mean when they ask for parental involvement? They mean
that you are supposed to tell your children that yes, the teacher is right,
and you never will ge
> brian wrote:
> Screw that, give me more stadiumsgive me MORE sex parties, only extend
> them to us non-criminals. Come on GG, i thought you were socially liberal?
> :)
>
Sure, hit me where it hurts.
~|
Find out how CFTicket
>
> That being said, I fully agree when it comes to stadiums. The last
> thing I want to subsidize is sex parties for criminals.
>
Screw that, give me more stadiumsgive me MORE sex parties, only extend
them to us non-criminals. Come on GG, i thought you were socially liberal?
:)
Speaking o
Who said anything about me not wanting schools?
- MSAngry ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 11:26 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Private High School orders students to take down blogs
> Matthew wrote:
> Cha
s, is up to the parent.
- Matt Small
-Original Message-
From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 11:22 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Private High School orders students to take down blogs
On 10/27/05, Matthew Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
&g
> Matthew wrote:
> Charlotte recently built a
> big ol' stadium for the basketball team. I'll never see the inside of it, I
> think it's a waste of money and I resent my tax dollars being spent on it.
The argument for it goes like this:
Schools (or stadiums) provide a public good and you benefit
On 10/27/05, Matthew Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, but life sucks, doesn't it? I do in fact think that people should get
> money back for many things that they don't use. Charlotte recently built a
> big ol' stadium for the basketball team. I'll never see the inside of it, I
> think i
take down blogs
So what you're saying is that you want the money but not the oversight
that goes along with it. Without that oversight then how do we know if
the kids are learning adequately, or that what their are learning is
acceptable?
In other words he who pays the piper calls the tune.
la
e a child gets a better education it's the right thing to do.
- Matt Small
-Original Message-
From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 10:42 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Private High School orders students to take down blogs
I guess we all need t
ot a way to
> introduce Big Brother into a private school.
>
> - Matt Small
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 10:25 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Private High School orders students
IL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 10:04 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Private High School orders students to take down blogs
>
> > Jerry wrote:
> > No Gruss, you are wrong.
> > If private schools do not have to accept people on basis of race,
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 10:11 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Private High School orders students to take down blogs
>
> Semantic police! Whoop! Whoop!
>
> on the right tact
-
From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 10:25 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Private High School orders students to take down blogs
Well, we are certainly going to disagree on this one.
That is a very bad analogy.
Federal money should not be spent
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 10:04 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Private High School orders students to take down blogs
>
> > Jerry wrote:
> > No Gruss, you are wrong.
> > If private schools do not have to accept people on basis of race,
usic to sell because you spent your tax refund on an Eminem album.
- Matt Small
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 10:04 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Private High School orders students to take down blogs
> Jerry wrote
I was just feeling ornery and wanted a response.
=)
But yes.
On 10/27/05, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jerry wrote:
> > No Gruss, you are wrong.
> > If private schools do not have to accept people on basis of race,
> > religion, test scores, IQ, money, athletic ability or special ne
Semantic police! Whoop! Whoop!
on the right tact
should be
on the right tack (a sailing term meaning heading or direction)
I don't think Kevin's statement was necessarily tactful.
On 10/27/05, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just to chime in here (damn... I wasn't going to get into this
> Jerry wrote:
> No Gruss, you are wrong.
> If private schools do not have to accept people on basis of race,
> religion, test scores, IQ, money, athletic ability or special needs,
> then they have a completely unfair advantage in every way.
I see your point. The competition can be within a group
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 9:46 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Private High School orders students to take down blogs
>
> You're right and you're wrong. Schools do dread pa
Great write up.
We don't just need parental involvement, we need the right kind of parents,
and the right kind of involvement.
> You're right and you're wrong. Schools do dread parental involvment. But
> that's because parent's get involved in the wrong things. Parents didn't
> get
> involved
You're right and you're wrong. Schools do dread parental involvment. But
that's because parent's get involved in the wrong things. Parents didn't get
involved in teaching their children the requisite discipline that is
required to focus learning. Parents didn't get involved in supporting the
curric
Funny how you complain about public schools. However you withdrew from
them. Because fo that do you have a right to complain about them? I
think you're letting your prejudices rule what you see.
The data is very strong about parental involvement. Studies using the
NORC database with 20,000 and mo
Unfortunately you cannot legislate parental involvement. That does
seem to be the chief factor in kids succeeding in schools.
For bad schools about the only solutionis to shut down the entire
school and ship the kids elsewhere. Then renovate the school to bring
it up to a minimal set of standards,
The schools constantly whine about parental involvement. They are affronted
when it materializes. They don't *want* involved parents... they want guilty
parents. I am sure that offended a lot of people out there, but I get the
impression that not a lot of your have personal experience with the issu
Privatization isn't a magic bullet.
Private schools only achieve greater academic success because they attract
involved parents, who then send off their engaged students...to be
instructed by motivated teachers.
Privatizing a shit-hole school isn't going to magically transform the
students and
It's costing way more than that, just in my small town.
On 10/27/05, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > How do you break the cycle of bad parenting/bad schooling in those places?
> >
>
> That, my friend, is the $64,000 question.
~~
>
> How do you break the cycle of bad parenting/bad schooling in those places?
>
That, my friend, is the $64,000 question.
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support
efficiency by 100%
http://www.ho
The only way I can see to overcome this is to privatize non-performing
schools. The state takeover is bogus because it does not relaly happen at
least not here, nor do I think it would really be a solution if it did.
On 10/27/05, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Actually, I have no pro
Actually, I have no problem with private schools receiving public moneys.
But by accepting the money, they are accepting some oversight and loss
of control.
For example, I think private schools should be treated similar to
magnet schools (which are really an example of a private school
outside of
Public schools are failing because they have an unlimited sense of
entitlement. Kinda like the Red Cross.
Dana
On 10/27/05, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Private schools should receive no government funding.
>
> Public schools are failing nationwide because of the failure of parents
> and
> t
Private schools should receive no government funding.
Public schools are failing nationwide because of the failure of parents and
the resulting apathy of their children. Involved parents create energetic
children which leads to invigorated teachers..The public schools can't
be fixed from th
No Gruss, you are wrong.
If private schools do not have to accept people on basis of race,
religion, test scores, IQ, money, athletic ability or special needs,
then they have a completely unfair advantage in every way. That would
not be the "free market" education you have been preaching about.
I
yes, I see I was repeating other people. It's 6:15 here, your point is? :)
On 10/27/05, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Dana wrote:
> > ah but if government dollars are involved then there need to be
> standards.
> >
>
> You're up mighty early aren't you?
>
> (BTW - see other answers f
> Dana wrote:
> ah but if government dollars are involved then there need to be standards.
>
You're up mighty early aren't you?
(BTW - see other answers for a response to your point.)
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your c
not sure how it works in BC but in Ontario the Catholic schools are also
government funded...
On 10/27/05, Greg Hamm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Not sure about the whole voucher system in the states, but up here in
> canuck land, independant schools need to follow the standards set by
> the pro
> Marlon wrote:
> Without regulation and standards, I think you run the risk of funding
> a school that could promote hate or other values that don't jibe well
> with the general populace.
This needn't be an all-or-nothing sort of thing. The gov't would be
free to set standards as pre-reqs for sc
ah but if government dollars are involved then there need to be standards.
On 10/26/05, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Marlon wrote:
> > These are my feelings also that a private school should be able to do
> > set whatever f'ed up rules they want. I just think the public
> > shouldn'
> Jerry wrote:
> It is only fair.
I don't see it that way in this case. The public schools would only
be taking federal dollars *if* they could convince the parents that
they had the best system for their kids. I think the fed could create
minimum threshold standards but beyond that it should be
Not sure about the whole voucher system in the states, but up here in
canuck land, independant schools need to follow the standards set by
the provincial gov't to get funding, ie a cahtolic shool can receive
funding for its students if they teach math, science, social studies,
reading and writing a
+100
On 10/26/05, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If they are taking federal or local dollars, then they need to be
> subject to the same requirements and restrictions that public schools
> are.
>
> Otherwise we should just cancel the need for any school to follow any
> guidelines.
>
>
Without regulation and standards, I think you run the risk of funding
a school that could promote hate or other values that don't jibe well
with the general populace. Do we allow public funds to be used at a
white supremacists school then? I don't see how you make the jump
from a "funded k-12 edu
> If they are taking federal or local dollars, then they
> need to be subject to the same requirements and
> restrictions that public schools are.
IF being the keyword there. Just because the government gives you an
education voucher doesn't mean a private school has to accept it in lieu of
cash
> These are my feelings also that a private school should be
> able to do set whatever f'ed up rules they want. I just
> think the public shouldn't have to fund these through
> vouchers.
That's a discussion for another time, but I will say I agree with that
sentiment and leave it at that. :)
-
If they are taking federal or local dollars, then they need to be
subject to the same requirements and restrictions that public schools
are.
Otherwise we should just cancel the need for any school to follow any
guidelines.
If some schools must, all schools must. If some schools don't, all
schools
> Marlon wrote:
> These are my feelings also that a private school should be able to do
> set whatever f'ed up rules they want. I just think the public
> shouldn't have to fund these through vouchers.
>
Normally I'd agree with you, but not in this case because there's a
federal guarantee that eve
These are my feelings also that a private school should be able to do
set whatever f'ed up rules they want. I just think the public
shouldn't have to fund these through vouchers.
On 10/26/05, Justin D. Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I guess my stance is kind of unusual, since I'd be
> > up
I can't argue that it is illegal for the school to make these rules if it wants
to. But I would argue that would be very difficult for the school to enforce,
how hard would it be for any student to use a nom-de-plume. I would also argue
that while it is not illegal, it is probable not very goo
> Justin wrote:
> I wouldn't say unusual, just appropriate to fit the situation. With it
> being a private school I feel they should be able to set whatever rules they
> want. If the parents don't like it, they can send their kids elsewhere. If
> it were a public school, I would be all kinds of
> I guess my stance is kind of unusual, since I'd be
> up in arms if it was a public school, but there it
> is.
I wouldn't say unusual, just appropriate to fit the situation. With it
being a private school I feel they should be able to set whatever rules they
want. If the parents don't like it,
Without touching on the whole voucher/FBC issue, I have to say that this
doesn't bother me. It's a private school -- the families choose to send
their kids there, and they can choose not to if they don't like the rules.
I guess my stance is kind of unusual, since I'd be up in arms if it was
a
IL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 9:49 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Private High School orders students to take down blogs
Caught this from Slashdot. Yeah, giving gov't money to faith based
charities and vouchers to faith based schools is a great idea..or
not..
http://ww
Caught this from Slashdot. Yeah, giving gov't money to faith based
charities and vouchers to faith based schools is a great idea..or
not..
http://www.app.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051024/NEWS03/510240319/1007
--
Marlon
I just discovered that my blog has been Google Jacked, and so has
eveny other Macromedia centric blog I looked at. I just posted a
description of the problem to my blog. Anyone on the list had to deal
with this before?
http://www.sumoc.com/blog/index.cfm?mode=entry&entry=D09F127B-5004-2066-B7791
The only problem that I see (may be unwarranted, I have not finished
looking it over completely) is that the CF flavor of FAAG (LOL!) doesn't
pull ALL the entries from ALL the CF blogs. I want to make sure that I
don't miss anything!
Ray
At 11:20 AM 1/27/2005, you wrote:
>I
Just an FYI, an earlier poster had the old url for my blog. Please use this:
ray.camdenfamily.com
instead. Thanks.
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 11:57:08 -0500, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All right, fine, I will add it.
>
> The results of the Pats speak for themselves. :)
>
> Ray
>
~~
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
