na Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 3:13 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Bush: Stop 'ugly politics' over judicial nominees
>
> some people seem to have built a whole political philosophy on this
> statement :)
>
Friday, November 14, 2003 3:13 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush: Stop 'ugly politics' over judicial nominees
some people seem to have built a whole political philosophy on this
statement :)
> republican said "Sure the republicans have done it, but the democrats
>
some people seem to have built a whole political philosophy on this
statement :)
> republican said "Sure the republicans have done it, but the democrats
> have done it more"...what a cry baby.
>
> Marlon
>
> Bill Wheatley wrote:
>
> > http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/11/13/senate.nomine
t;president.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 3:41 PM
>To: CF-Community
>Subject: Re: Bush: Stop 'ugly politics' over judicial nominees
>
>I only thought that worked for the Miskatonic University chap
No, the Miskatonic chapter has the added advantage of having a Whatley for
president.
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 3:41 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush: Stop 'ugly politics' over judicial nominees
I on
-Original Message-
From: Jim Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 3:34 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush: Stop 'ugly politics' over judicial nominees
Dread Chtulhu eats the both of you.
- Jim
John Stanley wrote:
>na-n
Funny, its always been there. In fact, my semester at Miskatonic changed my
life.
larry
At 03:43 PM 11/13/2003, you wrote:
>Yeah, well the college pretty much nixed our suggestion for a
>name-change as well.
>
>- Jim
>
>Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> >I only thought that worked for the Miskatonic Uni
ginal Message-
From: Jim Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 3:34 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush: Stop 'ugly politics' over judicial nominees
Dread Chtulhu eats the both of you.
- Jim
John Stanley wrote:
>na-na-na-naaa-na you cant get me
Yeah, well the college pretty much nixed our suggestion for a
name-change as well.
- Jim
Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>I only thought that worked for the Miskatonic University chapter.
>
>larry
>
>
>
>>I started a "Fellowship of Cthonian Athletes" chapter in college.
>>Unfortunately, we were unabl
I only thought that worked for the Miskatonic University chapter.
larry
>I started a "Fellowship of Cthonian Athletes" chapter in college.
>Unfortunately, we were unable to call the minions or Ry'leh to consume
>our opponents before the national championship. We had great parties,
>though.
>
>
'ugly politics' over judicial nominees
>
>
>I'm rubber you're glue, it bounces off me and sticks on you!
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: John Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 3:06 PM
>To: CF-Community
>Subject: R
na-na-na-naaa-na you cant get me!
-Original Message-
From: Schuster, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 3:09 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Bush: Stop 'ugly politics' over judicial nominees
I'm rubber you're glue, it bounces off
I'm rubber you're glue, it bounces off me and sticks on you!
-Original Message-
From: John Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 3:06 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Bush: Stop 'ugly politics' over judicial nominees
wel
well at least you tried. ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Jim Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 2:50 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush: Stop 'ugly politics' over judicial nominees
I started a "Fellowship of Cthonian Athletes"
I started a "Fellowship of Cthonian Athletes" chapter in college.
Unfortunately, we were unable to call the minions or Ry'leh to consume
our opponents before the national championship. We had great parties,
though.
- Jim
John Stanley wrote:
>>>Sure the republicans have done it, but the demo
>>Sure the republicans have done it, but the democrats
>>have done it more"...
That's why we need another major political "power". I have just the one in
mind : http://www.cthulhu.org/
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
I believe Clinton had 10 nominess who were filibustered out by the
Republicans in the Senate. Bush has had 3 - and has had 98% of his
nominees approved. What a baby.
- Jim
Bill Wheatley wrote:
>http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/11/13/senate.nominees/index.html
>
>"It's wrong and it's sham
I was listening to the Diane Rheams show the other day and they had a
democrat and a republican on the show discussing this issue. The
argument kept going back and forth not really saying much until the
republican said "Sure the republicans have done it, but the democrats
have done it more"...
http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/11/13/senate.nominees/index.html
"It's wrong and it's shameful, and it's hurting the system," he told
reporters.
Sure nothing shrub has done has hurt the system. Let him put a
disclaimer on the bottom of all his quotes...by the way i know i'm a
hypocrit and
19 matches
Mail list logo
