Somehow I'm not surprised.

larry

>From yesterday's Washington Post:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A7908-2004Jun1.html

E-Mail Links Cheney's Office, Contract
Officials Say Only Involvement in Halliburton Deal Was Announcing It

By Robert O'Harrow Jr.
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, June 2, 2004; Page A06

Shortly before the Pentagon awarded a division of oil services contactor
Halliburton Co. a sole-source contract to help restore Iraqi oil fields last
year, an Army Corps of Engineers official wrote an e-mail saying the award
had been "coordinated" with the office of Vice President Cheney,
Halliburton's former chief executive.


The March 5, 2003, e-mail, disclosed over the weekend by Time magazine,
noted that Douglas Feith, a senior Pentagon official, had signed off on the
deal "contingent on informing WH [the White House] tomorrow."

"We anticipate no issues since action has been coordinated w VP's office,"
it continued.

Three days later, Halliburton subsidiary KBR was granted the contract, which
was worth as much as $7 billion, according to information on the Army Corps
of Engineers Web site. The first job under the contract was putting out oil
fires. It was later expanded to include shipping fuel to Iraq, which led to
Pentagon auditor charges that KBR had overbilled the government.

Yesterday, officials in Cheney's office and at the Pentagon played down the
significance of the note, saying the word "coordinate" referred only to the
public announcement of a deal that had been quietly in the works for months
to prepare for the possibility that diplomatic efforts to avoid war in Iraq
might fail. The United States began hostilities March 20.

"Vice President Cheney and his staff have had no involvement whatsoever in
government contracting decisions since he left private business to run for
vice president," said Cheney spokesman Kevin Kellems. Cheney was chief
executive of Halliburton from 1995 to 2000.

Chief Pentagon spokesman Lawrence T. DiRita said the vice president's office
took part in interagency discussions about the possible need for such a
contract, starting in the fall of 2002. But DiRita said Cheney's office had
no role in the decision to grant the award. He described the use of the word
"coordinate" in the e-mail as a "catch-all phrase" that signified "it's time
for this contract to be executed."

The author of the e-mail about the contract was blacked out of the document,
first obtained through a lawsuit by Judicial Watch, a nonprofit watchdog
group in the District. Army Corps of Engineers spokesman Scott Saunders
described the official who wrote the note as "just a messenger."

"Coordination with the vice president's office, if any, would have been done
at a much higher level than the Corps of Engineers," Saunders said. "It
certainly wouldn't have been done by anyone in the corps."

Democrats in Congress seized on the e-mail to revive allegations about a
Cheney role in the Halliburton contract. Rep. Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.),
ranking minority member of the House Committee on Government Reform, asked
Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld to provide details about officials
involved in the decision to award the contract and for "unredacted copies of
all communications" between the Pentagon and White House about Halliburton
contracts.

The campaign staff of Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.), the presumptive
Democratic nominee for president, arranged a conference call to raise
questions about the e-mail.

Later, in an e-mail, Kerry campaign spokesman Chad Clanton said, "It's time
for Dick Cheney to come clean and start answering questions about this
e-mail. What 'coordination' did Cheney's office do? Who coordinated for
Cheney?"

(c) 2004 The Washington Post Company

--
Larry C. Lyons
Web Analyst
BEI Resources
American Type Culture Collection
email: llyons(at)atcc(dot)org
tel: 703.365.2700.2678
--

This electronic communication, together with any attachments, may contain
information that is legally privileged, confidential or otherwise private.
The information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, please be
aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of
this communication or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please immediately notify the original
sender and delete the received information from your system. Thank you.
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to