Senator's pre-conceived notion of who
> they
> > believe is breaking right down party lines?
> >
> > Why are the Republicans on Clemens' side, and the Dems are on McNamee's
> > side?
> >
> > I swear, I do not understand partisans and how they
onnecticut, where they don't think
right and are Yankees fans.)
On Feb 13, 2008 3:22 PM, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can someone explain to me why the Senator's pre-conceived notion of who they
> believe is breaking right down party lines?
>
> Why are the
Can someone explain to me why the Senator's pre-conceived notion of who they
believe is breaking right down party lines?
Why are the Republicans on Clemens' side, and the Dems are on McNamee's
side?
I swear, I do not understand partisans and how they think...
On Feb 1
abscess on his butt
Yeah, I have him steroids, and did I mention I saved the syringes and
cotton balls?
The main change in testimony came, according to the Feds and to
McNamee, after Clemens appeared on 60 minutes, and called McNamee a
liar, and talked about McNamee's son's health is
On Feb 13, 2008 2:03 PM, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> how can you be inconsistent with facts, yet be credible?
>
Well, see, when we said there are definitely WMD's in Iraq, we thought we
were being truthful because we had this intelligence that said.OH...you
are talking about
What?!?!?
Chairman: I found Mcnamee very credible, he made a lot of statements that
were inconsistent, but I feel he was truthful.
how can you be inconsistent with facts, yet be credible?
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is t
He could also be believeable becuase some people are just good at lying. :)
On 2/13/08, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> And Waxman takes the lead.
>
> It didn't look possible. Burton had a significant lead going into the
> last minute, but Waxman just took the prize.
>
> On Feb 13,
And Waxman takes the lead.
It didn't look possible. Burton had a significant lead going into the
last minute, but Waxman just took the prize.
On Feb 13, 2008 12:43 PM, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Waxman slides into a strong second place.
>
>
> On Feb 13, 2008 12:00 PM, Jerry Johnso
e is doing it really, really well.
Still too close to call for me.
On Feb 13, 2008 12:50 PM, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm reading some of the transcripts that have already come outi'm
> telling you, Clemens denials could not be any more direct and adamant. He
Maybe i'm just gullibleor really stupid.but I find myself believing
Clemens. He's been consistent and straightforward, he's had the actions of
an innocent man. He's been willing to talk to anyone and everyone who would
listen to him. The fact that he is repeatedly poi
already come outi'm
> telling you, Clemens denials could not be any more direct and adamant. He
> is
> not mincing any words (like Bonds or McGwire or any of those losers did).
>
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8
I'm reading some of the transcripts that have already come outi'm
telling you, Clemens denials could not be any more direct and adamant. He is
not mincing any words (like Bonds or McGwire or any of those losers did).
I dunno man.if he really is lying this badly.why is he do
Waxman slides into a strong second place.
On Feb 13, 2008 12:00 PM, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So far, biggus dickus award goes to Dan Burton, second place goes to
> (I think) Danny Davis (the first speaker)
~|
Ad
Wow, fascinating.
On Feb 13, 2008 11:14 AM, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Their testimony was read into the record.
>
> Pettitte claims to have had a conversation with Clemens in 1999, where
> Clemens admitted taking HGH.
> Right after that talk, in 1999, P
Clemens response to that was that Petitte misunderstood his conversations.
On 2/13/08, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Their testimony was read into the record.
>
>
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 soft
Their testimony was read into the record.
Pettitte claims to have had a conversation with Clemens in 1999, where
Clemens admitted taking HGH.
Right after that talk, in 1999, Pettitte told his wife about the conversation.
She testified that she remembers that discussion in 1999.
Pettitte claims
On Feb 13, 2008 11:00 AM, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am still on the fence as to Clemens (because Mcnamee is such a
> dirtball, and I like Clemens), but I think Petitte and his wife's
> testimony is pretty damning.
>
Was it? How do you know? Have they
t inject steroids, now he does.
He said Clemens was at a party, when he wasn't.
There's a bunch of different things and it's hard to follow them all.
On 2/13/08, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> But what did he lie about?
>
>
~~~
i cant see this, so, im only listening, but i agree :)
however, this crap about worry about the bbq and other things is WEIRD!!!
tw
On Feb 13, 2008 12:00 PM, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So far, biggus dickus award goes to Dan Burton, second place goes to
> (I think) Danny Davis (t
On Feb 13, 2008 11:02 AM, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i know mcnamee seems to be a liar, and admits that
> and whatever, but if those syringes have his dna, wow... what a loser.
>
>
So what? He's already admitted that McNamee injected him with vitamins. A
used syrin
;
> nice.
>
> fuck clemens.
>
> i know mcnamee seems to be a liar, and admits that
> and whatever, but if those syringes have his dna, wow... what a loser.
>
> tw
>
> On 2/13/08, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Wait, one of the Senators called Mcnamee a
Both McNamee and Clemens.
It is hard to think of either as a liar or a jerk when facing a panel
of professionals at both.
On Feb 13, 2008 11:56 AM, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wait, one of the Senators called Mcnamee a liar?!?!?!?!?!
>
> I wish I was watching
im listening, its GREAT
xm has it on espnxtra on 141
nice.
fuck clemens.
i know mcnamee seems to be a liar, and admits that
and whatever, but if those syringes have his dna, wow... what a loser.
tw
On 2/13/08, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wait, one of the Senators called
But what did he lie about?
For the most part, it sounds like he kept "holding things back" in all
cases, and was trying to limit the damage of his testimony.
I am still on the fence as to Clemens (because Mcnamee is such a
dirtball, and I like Clemens), but I think Petitte and
trial not trail ...
On 2/13/08, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Right now my feeling overall is they are on Clemens' side. The senator
> that called Mcnamee a liar (I forget his name) also asked Mcnamee how is
> Clemens going to get his reputation back? And t
Right now my feeling overall is they are on Clemens' side. The senator that
called Mcnamee a liar (I forget his name) also asked Mcnamee how is Clemens
going to get his reputation back? And that the preceedings and the "media
trail" was disgusting.
There's so many holes in Mcn
Wait, one of the Senators called Mcnamee a liar?!?!?!?!?!
I wish I was watching! Who's winning?
On Feb 13, 2008 10:43 AM, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is on and it's been fascinating. If it was in front of a jury, and I had
> to
> decide if Clem
Is on and it's been fascinating. If it was in front of a jury, and I had to
decide if Clemens was innocent, I would vote in favor of Clemens.
Document after document and transcript after transcript keeps being brought
up showing how many times McNamee has lied and lied again. Basically, righ
im and this is just icing on the cake.
>
> I still love it that my Sox played a VERY minor role in this scandal...
>
> On Dec 19, 2007 1:05 PM, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What are your thoughts on Clemens now, Ray, since his adamant denial? He's
> &
being pissed at him and this is just icing on the cake.
I still love it that my Sox played a VERY minor role in this scandal...
On Dec 19, 2007 1:05 PM, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What are your thoughts on Clemens now, Ray, since his adamant denial? He's
> really on
He's the greatest pitcher, over a career, that I've ever seen.
On Dec 19, 2007 2:30 PM, Rick Root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like Roger Clemens... I think he's one of the greatest pitchers of all
> time.
>
> What he's done the last few years is a little
I like Roger Clemens... I think he's one of the greatest pitchers of all time.
What he's done the last few years is a little silly but I don't
totally blame him for wanting to make another $10 million or so every
year but still have nice long winters and not have to deal with
It's better than Christmas.
On Dec 19, 2007 3:02 PM, Rick Root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Until then, Clemens is a roider in my eyes.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic releas
when he sues the people making the claims, I might give some credence
to his denials.
Until then, Clemens is a roider in my eyes.
which really bums me out.
Rick
On 12/19/07, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What are your thoughts on Clemens now, Ray, since his adamant den
What are your thoughts on Clemens now, Ray, since his adamant denial? He's
really only the second player i've ever heard issue such a direct denial of
steroid use.
of course, the first one was Palmeiro!
--
The leader of the band is tired
and his eyes are g
MSNBC Breaking News
> ------
>
> Clemens, 42, wins 7th Cy Young award -
>
>
~|
Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net
http://www.cfhosting.net
Message: http://www.houseoff
36 matches
Mail list logo
