"Typical."
How typical of you to say that.
"I don't feel I 'lean' in any one particular direction."
It's not how you feel, it's how you are perceived.
"I know that is difficult for for people who lean far in either direction
to comprehend, but I would hazard a guess I would agree with as many
Statistical insignificance is meaningless. Please show me a formal
definition of it in statistics? It is not there period. Statistical
insignificance is a term from marketing. Not stats. Statistical
significance has a specific meaning. If a difference is considered not
statistically significant, i
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "Not sure why that surprises you. I was pretty vocal about it 4 years ago."
>
> Ehh. Four years ago? I guess my memories of your political leanings from
> four years ago have been supplanted by your more recent political leanings.
Typical
Back to the issue of debate humor, here's a link to a Taiwanese animation
company's summation of the debate.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=iNhUI8ktHuw#!
J
-
We dont believe that anybody is entitled to success in this country. -
Barack Obama
And I think that Barack h
"Not sure why that surprises you. I was pretty vocal about it 4 years ago."
Ehh. Four years ago? I guess my memories of your political leanings from
four years ago have been supplanted by your more recent political leanings.
"Not sure why this surprises you, either. "
It just surprises me th
I disagree, Larry. Small fluctuations within the margin of error are
considered statistically insignificant.
Of course the comments Jerry made have a built in presumption that the
electorate is a stable population, which isn't true. It very well
might be the case that very few people who voted fo
Jerry there is no such thing as a statistically insignificant amount.
If you're going to use the terms, at least use them correctly -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_significance
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "Wrong. I know at least 2 people who voted for McCa
I think they're criticizing the Emperor's performance without the
teleprompter. But nice try.
.
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> I find it fascinating that the opposition is so short of actual substance
> to criticize that they are making an issue over teleprompters.
>
~~
I find it fascinating that the opposition is so short of actual substance
to criticize that they are making an issue over teleprompters.
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> I am not sure I agree Pres. Obama is 'much worse'. Pres. Bush was a
> train wreck without it. But neith
I am not sure I agree Pres. Obama is 'much worse'. Pres. Bush was a
train wreck without it. But neither is what I would call 'good'
without it...at least not consistently.
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Yeah but Obama is much worse without a tp but he gets a pass. Then
> there'
Yeah but Obama is much worse without a tp but he gets a pass. Then
there's Biden :)
.
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:30 AM, Sam wrote:
>>
>> So watching Obama without a teleprompter didn't shock you into reality?
>>
>
> I cannot recall, and sea
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "Wrong. I know at least 2 people who voted for McCain that are voting for
> Obama - myself and my wife."
>
> You voted for McCain? Wow.
Not sure why that surprises you. I was pretty vocal about it 4 years ago.
>
> And you admit you are vo
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:30 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> So watching Obama without a teleprompter didn't shock you into reality?
>
I cannot recall, and searches pulled up nothing, were you as critical
of Pres. Bush (the younger) we he was without a teleprompter? He was
horrendous without a teleprompter.
"Wrong. I know at least 2 people who voted for McCain that are voting for
Obama - myself and my wife."
You voted for McCain? Wow.
And you admit you are voting for Obama? Double wow. Good on you for
having the courage to stand up on what you are doing. I can't say I
understand it, but it's you
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> 1. No one who voted for John McCain will vote for Obama.
Wrong. I know at least 2 people who voted for McCain that are voting
for Obama - myself and my wife.
--
Scott Stroz
---
You can make things happen, you can watch thin
"I don't think he will lose the election. But its not because I am so enamored
with him that I cannot see his flaws."
That's good. It would be easy to confuse you with Helen Keller if you
coudn't see his flaws and awful performance over the last four years.
"Its not because I dislike Gov. Romne
So watching Obama without a teleprompter didn't shock you into reality?
.
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>>
>>
>> Wait until Obama loses the election. The left and the media will eat him
>> alive. The vetting that s
://www.threeravensconsulting.com
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 6:50 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Debate funny
Like lefty hero Jon Stewart?
"You know, I used to think the pauses, he was
: Judah McAuley [mailto:ju...@wiredotter.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 8:12 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Debate funny
Obama not vetted...I really think that that might be my favorite of the
right wing talking points. Yup, no one asked any questions of Obama before
the 2008
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
>
> Wait until Obama loses the election. The left and the media will eat him
> alive. The vetting that should have taken place five years ago will
> finally take place.
>
I don't think he will lose the election. But its not because I am so
Obama not vetted...I really think that that might be my favorite of
the right wing talking points. Yup, no one asked any questions of
Obama before the 2008 election. No one tried digging through his past
and tried flinging anything and everything to see if it might stick.
If only there had been so
"So, the debate didn't go as well as planned?"
Was anyone really surprised by the outcome?
I've really enjoyed watching the left turn on Obama. That has been quite
humorous. The excuses are great as well. Really Al Gore? The altitude.
Really DNC? Romney was too mean and too aggressive. Co
Like lefty hero Jon Stewart?
"You know, I used to think the pauses, he was just trying to think of
smaller words for the little brains to figure out what he was saying.
This time, I really think the pauses were just, I like food.
My
children are nice. Just different, he just didnt seem prese
l.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 9:14 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Debate funny
speaking of debate funnies, this was a good bit of photoshoppery.
https://twitter.com/ericgrant/statuses/253673901698199552
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Larry C. Lyons
wrote:
> If the Twitt
Not for the fans of hoping they'll some change.
Sent from my iPhone 4S.
On Oct 4, 2012, at 12:16 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> So, the debate didn't go as well as planned?
>
> .
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>>
>> Romney hasn't removed the orange spray tan that Boehner
So, the debate didn't go as well as planned?
.
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> Romney hasn't removed the orange spray tan that Boehner lent him for
> the speech in front of the Latino Business Association.
>
~~~
Romney hasn't removed the orange spray tan that Boehner lent him for
the speech in front of the Latino Business Association.
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
>> Obama looks better with Romney's hair than Romney
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> Obama looks better with Romney's hair than Romney does.
The strangest thing about this pic to me is that they appear to be
approximately the same skin color.
-Cameron
...
~~~
Obama looks better with Romney's hair than Romney does.
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>>
>> speaking of debate funnies, this was a good bit of photoshoppery.
>>
>> https://twitter.com/ericgrant/statuses/25367390169
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> speaking of debate funnies, this was a good bit of photoshoppery.
>
> https://twitter.com/ericgrant/statuses/253673901698199552
>
That is hysterical. I can't stop laughing.
--
Scott Stroz
---
You can make things happen,
speaking of debate funnies, this was a good bit of photoshoppery.
https://twitter.com/ericgrant/statuses/253673901698199552
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> If the Twitt did that, boy there would be a lot of pissed off kids.
> Toddler riots in the streets.
>
> I wonder w
If the Twitt did that, boy there would be a lot of pissed off kids.
Toddler riots in the streets.
I wonder what he'd replace it with? A new channel that shows nothing
but the Lives of the Rich and Famous?
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Michael Dinowitz
wrote:
>
> Sesame Street has just become
Sesame Street has just become a dark alley. Very dark.
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:42 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> https://twitter.com/HeinekenDude/status/253697635108671488/photo/1/large
>
> --
> Scott Stroz
> ---
> You can make things happen, you can watch things happen or you can
>
https://twitter.com/HeinekenDude/status/253697635108671488/photo/1/large
--
Scott Stroz
---
You can make things happen, you can watch things happen or you can
wonder what the f*&k happened. - Cpt. Phil Harris
http://xkcd.com/386/
34 matches
Mail list logo
