PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Umm, they all render differently from each other?
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 10:53 AM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subj
nesday, October 27, 2004 10:53 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Firefox -- HOOKED!
>
> yeah :(
>
> hmmm.
>
> and what is wrong with quirks mode :)
>
> tw
>
> On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:56:43 -0400, Sandy Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > No
Umm, they all render differently from each other?
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 10:53 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Firefox -- HOOKED!
yeah :(
hmmm.
and what is wrong with quirks mode :)
tw
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09
Nothing at all if you either don't care about cross-browser
compatability or don't mind going bald.
-Kevin
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 10:52:53 -0400, Tony Weeg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yeah :(
>
> hmmm.
>
> and what is wrong with quirks mode :)
>
> tw
~~~
Coldfusion Developer wrote:
> I am so hooked on using FireFox now.
>
I've recently made the switch from Mozilla to Firefox. I'm finding the
little differences very annoying but I'm a flexible man. I'm reading
through the help files etc and viewing the forums at moillazine.org.
I guess I swit
Do you mean strict as opposed to transitional or do you mean strict as
"correct"? You can use Transitional and still get the benefit of the
better standards rendering. We have to do that here since we have site
editors that non-techies use which deprecated tags.
But if you've got complete code con
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 9:39 AM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: Firefox -- HOOKED!
> >
> > some urls to help explain what ive been doing wrong would
2004 9:39 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Firefox -- HOOKED!
>
> some urls to help explain what ive been doing wrong would be cool.
>
> how about no DTD :)
>
> tw
>
> On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:30:17 -0500, Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > S
.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 9:39 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Firefox -- HOOKED!
some urls to help explain what ive been doing wrong would be cool.
how about no DTD :)
tw
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:30:17 -0500, Kevin Graeme
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/doctype/
Without a doctype it's a rendering free-for-all. Damn the standards.
-Kevin
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:38:50 -0400, Tony Weeg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> some urls to help explain what ive been doing wrong would be cool.
>
> how about no DTD :)
>
> tw
some urls to help explain what ive been doing wrong would be cool.
how about no DTD :)
tw
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:30:17 -0500, Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Start by using a proper DTD on your pages. I don't know that you
> aren't, but without that trying to do standards based develo
-
> From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 9:07 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Firefox -- HOOKED!
>
> aight, so ive had it installed, and used it sporadically, but ive found that
> the css i have working GREAT in IE6 aint jivi
Start by using a proper DTD on your pages. I don't know that you
aren't, but without that trying to do standards based development is
like trying to snowboard in Tahiti. And the default DTDs in
CFStudio/Homesite+ are wrong.
Odds are that the problems are more in IE6. The really whacked thing
thoug
If I understand correctly, the reason IE is more forgiving is because it uses the MS
Word rendering engine. Am I right?
-Patrick
>-Original Message-
>From: Sandy Clark
>
>
>Its IE 6.
>
>At this point in time, I've found that Firefox is the most CSS
>2 standards
>compliant browser. Idea
October 27, 2004 9:07 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Firefox -- HOOKED!
aight, so ive had it installed, and used it sporadically, but ive found that
the css i have working GREAT in IE6 aint jivin' in firefox, well, not 100%,
about 85%. so i have a question for y'alls firefoxians...
is it
i think thats where im at...
so, if i hear you right, if i make it firefox compliant, it will work in IE?
tw
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:13:31 -0400, ColdFusion Developer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> so far from what I noticed is the same. Just have to
> remember the IE is more forgiving in code des
so far from what I noticed is the same. Just have to
remember the IE is more forgiving in code design.
Whereas Firefox (netscape 5.0) isn't.
I did notice one of my sites was designed using IE as
the primary browser was slightly off when viewed in
Firefox. Actually it wasa dealing with dynamaic
PRGoogleBar: Google bar with Page Rank
ieview: Opens pages in IE. Good for those sites that don't work in Firefox.
> Web Developer: which developer doesn't?
> LiveHTTPHeaders:show HTTP headers
> Checky: (X)HTML, CSS, RSS, etc validation tools
> Plain Text Li
aight, so ive had it installed, and used it sporadically,
but ive found that the css i have working GREAT in IE6
aint jivin' in firefox, well, not 100%, about 85%. so i have a question
for y'alls firefoxians...
is it IE6 or is it FireFox?
and then, i guess my next question... if i get it to r
Coldfusion Developer wrote:
>
> I am using the editCSS, web Developer 8, as well as the ieview.
Web Developer: which developer doesn't?
LiveHTTPHeaders:show HTTP headers
Checky: (X)HTML, CSS, RSS, etc validation tools
Plain Text Links: copies plain text URLs
i am hooked on it too!
but none of the apps we write here at Liebert work on it.
every thing reliese to hevily on axtive-x & com objects.
i tried bringing it to there atention that alot of military
instalations will move away from ie & ythat reling on pc integration
is silly if say m$ every drops
I am so hooked on using FireFox now.
There is some very very useful extensions.
What are some of the extensions that you recommend?
I am using the editCSS, web Developer 8, as well as the ieview.
Thanks!!
~|
Purchase from Hou
22 matches
Mail list logo
