sorry, forgot to wrap that in
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Perhaps verbally..but not mathematically. I just found it ironic that
> a story about fudging data would fudge data.
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Michael Grant wrote:
> >
> > Well, it's been possible to
media matters hasa pretty good summary of how that happened... one of those
brain bubbles that got missed because they were so sure they were right.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Perhaps verbally..but not mathematically. I just found it ironic that
> a story about fudging
Perhaps verbally..but not mathematically. I just found it ironic that
a story about fudging data would fudge data.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Michael Grant wrote:
>
> Well, it's been possible to exceed 100% for years. "I always give 110%" and
> the like.
~~
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Fox News: 120% of the public believes scientists falsify global warming
> data
>
>
> http://killfile.newsvine.com/_news/2009/12/08/3606741-fox-news-120-of-the-public-believes-scientists-falsify-global-warming-data
>
>
Looks like the memo about
Well, it's been possible to exceed 100% for years. "I always give 110%" and
the like.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> > Mo wrote:
> >
> > Fox News: 120% of the public believes scientists falsify global warming
> data
> >
> >
> http://killfile.newsvine.com/_news/2009/12/
> Mo wrote:
>
> Fox News: 120% of the public believes scientists falsify global warming data
>
> http://killfile.newsvine.com/_news/2009/12/08/3606741-fox-news-120-of-the-public-believes-scientists-falsify-global-warming-data
Hm.
Well this throws into question the whole no-GW theory.
So, I gues
Fox News: 120% of the public believes scientists falsify global warming data
http://killfile.newsvine.com/_news/2009/12/08/3606741-fox-news-120-of-the-public-believes-scientists-falsify-global-warming-data
~|
Want to reach the C
