Just finished reading that in a meeting earlier. Good article and well
reasoned. I'm curious to see what the promised posting on Flex will
contain.
Judah
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> And the REAL news, courtesy of Mike Chambers:
>
> http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/20
And the REAL news, courtesy of Mike Chambers:
http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/2011/11/11/clarifications-on-flash-player-for-mobile-browsers-the-flash-platform-and-the-future-of-flash/
In short, Adobe is focusing on AIR and killing off the Flash plugin for
mobile browsers. You can build AIR apps
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Scott Stewart wrote:
> I think flash will always have a place, probably moved into an
> enterprise position. There are two major things that HTML 5 doesn't
> support out of the box, streaming and digital rights management. Flash
> does both.
>
I think it will rema
gt; Phone Gap and HTML5.
>
> They also announced at max that they were "doubling down" on Flash as a
> gaming platform, but I think that's really just a last ditch effort to
> reposition it. In all reality, HTML5 has won this battle, which is
> interesting since it won&
This move has been telegraphed by Adobe for awhile. Number of times the
word Flash came up in Day One Keynote at MAX? Zero. It was all about
Phone Gap and HTML5.
They also announced at max that they were "doubling down" on Flash as a
gaming platform, but I think that's rea
> Instead the company will focus on development around
> HTML5<http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/html5>technologies,
> which enable modern browsers to do essentially the same functions as Flash
> did but without relying on Adobe's proprietary technologies, and which can
>
Adobe <http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/adobe>,
will no longer be developed for mobile browsers, the company said in a note
that will accompany a financial briefing to analysts.
Instead the company will focus on development around
HTML5<http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/html5>technologi
this version is slightly jerky with some odd stuttering without being
in full screen.
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox
wrote:
>
> Hey Robert, what happens when you hit it now? The default size of the video
> is 960x540 and I just realized that I cargo-culted and had a lower r
that's supposed to be "not full screen"
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <
zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Robert, what happens when you hit it now? The default size of the
> video is 960x540 and I just realized that I cargo-culted and had a lower res
> in the video
mildly jumpy for me in this version...
ras
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox
wrote:
>
> Hey Robert, what happens when you hit it now? The default size of the video
> is 960x540 and I just realized that I cargo-culted and had a lower res in
> the video tag. :)
>
> So, by defaul
Hey Robert, what happens when you hit it now? The default size of the video
is 960x540 and I just realized that I cargo-culted and had a lower res in
the video tag. :)
So, by default it will play at full resolution, but now full screen. Just
want to make sure it still stays smooth for you.
On
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox
wrote:
>
> http://www.heresmywishlist.info/index2.html
>
No buffering that I saw. Good quality and smooth at small size, very
choppy in full screen on my HP Envy with quad core i7 620 and 1GB
Radeon graphics.
~
wow.
i love it.
awesome video!
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-comm
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Sisk, Kris wrote:
>
> Depends on the application. I've see programs that use binary that
> reverse the places so that your 1 bit is the furthest to the left, but
> usually the 1 bit is on the right just like in decimal. So most of the
> time a binary 10 = 2.
>
list. I'm not
sure why I missed it that time.
-Original Message-
From: G Money [mailto:gm0n3...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 11:29 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: html5 video
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Sisk, Kris
wrote:
>
> There are 10 types of people in
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Sisk, Kris wrote:
>
> There are 10 types of people in this world: those who understand binary
> and those who don't.
>
I've never gotten this little phrase.
If I'm reading my binary right, this would read: "There are one types of
people in this world."
buffering at all.
> Works great from the first load.
>
> But..why don't you just use Youtube?
>
> On 18 June 2010 11:08, Zaphod Beeblebrox >wrote:
>
> >
> > testing out html5 video. How does this work for you guys on html5
> enabled
> > browsers? T
unity
Subject: html5 video
testing out html5 video. How does this work for you guys on html5
enabled
browsers? The m4v and ogv are 220 & 187 Mb respectively so there might
be
quite a bit of buffering.
Thinking about posting these videos for my family this way so that it
might
prod th
WOW!
No buffering at all, was able to click forward in the stream and have
"instant" pickup from new point (<1 sec)
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox
wrote:
>
> testing out html5 video. How does this work for you guys on html5 enabled
> browsers? T
Holy crap!! It looks amazing!
The video is extremely sharp!
It is streaming perfectly, no stuttering or extreme buffering at all.
Works great from the first load.
But..why don't you just use Youtube?
On 18 June 2010 11:08, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
>
> testing out html5 video. Ho
testing out html5 video. How does this work for you guys on html5 enabled
browsers? The m4v and ogv are 220 & 187 Mb respectively so there might be
quite a bit of buffering.
Thinking about posting these videos for my family this way so that it might
prod them off IE. :)
have had it for about 9 months or so. its good. still dot digging interface
as much as cs3
but its good.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/143027215
I have a trial download. What's this Live thing it signed me up for?
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> So you can start playing around with HTML5 inside Dreamweaver CS5.
>
> http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/html5pack/
>
&g
So you can start playing around with HTML5 inside Dreamweaver CS5.
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/html5pack/
Does anyone have CS5?
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Kris Sisk wrote:
> I've gotta say in the browers that support it HTML5 works. For those of use
> who like to work with OSes other than Windows that's not always true of
> Flash. It's great on Windows, but on any other OS it's
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Crow T. Robot wrote:
> Best comment:
>
> "Sweet, can't wait to start coding up my HTML 5 sites in PERL 6."
LOL.
They'll probably be secured using OpenSSL 1.0.
--
Active creation is conceived as a transitive action in which there is
always presupposed an object a
Best comment:
"Sweet, can't wait to start coding up my HTML 5 sites in PERL 6."
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Charlie Griefer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> i haven't read the article... but wasn't HTML itself supposed to be
> deprecated in favor of XHTML? i thought HTML was effectively EOL'd?
I sure wish it were funny. All I need now is a client to get a hold of some
of this stuff and *insist* on using for their website!
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Crow T. Robot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> I kept reading to see when the joke was going to get mentionedno such
> luck.
>
> LOL,
i haven't read the article... but wasn't HTML itself supposed to be
deprecated in favor of XHTML? i thought HTML was effectively EOL'd?
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Crow T. Robot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> I kept reading to see when the joke was going to get mentionedno such
> luck.
>
I kept reading to see when the joke was going to get mentionedno such
luck.
LOL, this is like an Onion article.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Anyone read up on HTML 5?
> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/
>
> 2022 seems an AWFULL
Anyone read up on HTML 5?
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/
2022 seems an AWFULLY far off timeframe in terms of the internet. I thought
we all moved a bit faster than that?
http://www.heise.de/english/newsticker/news/115956
http://www.webmonkey.com/blog/HTML_5_Won_t_Be_Ready_Unti
31 matches
Mail list logo
