Um Jim, have you been watching too much G. Romero lately?
> >blah blah blah...
> >
> >Hopefully I have just covered the entire argument and we can avoid
> 400
> >redundant posts
>
> I say we embrace the situation.
>
> "ColdFusion: Undead zombie overload of web application programming
> langua
> Is it still faster to program in CF than .Net? Has .Net gotten more
> useful tools together or do you still have to write your own codebase
> for abstracting simple tasks like running a query if you want to
> achieve something similar to the CFQuery tag?
It's not really a valid question: .NET is
Is it still faster to program in CF than .Net? Has .Net gotten more
useful tools together or do you still have to write your own codebase
for abstracting simple tasks like running a query if you want to
achieve something similar to the CFQuery tag?
On 5/24/07, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>blah blah blah...
>
>Hopefully I have just covered the entire argument and we can avoid 400
>redundant posts
I say we embrace the situation.
"ColdFusion: Undead zombie overload of web application programming languages!"
We can start by bringing appropriate metaphors into the discussion. For
Person 1: Yes it is. Coldfusion is history. (insert the language du
jour)_ is so much better and so much more popular.
Person 2: No it's not. Coldfusion is the future. It was the first and
remains the best, Allaire, er... Macromedia... I mean Adobe .. Wel the
parent company du jour is de
