I like stability. Also, if there is a need for help (technical or grunt
labor) in any sort of migration, I'd be glad to help out.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> I know this is your baby and it's hard to give it up. You may be able to
> breath new life into the li
I know this is your baby and it's hard to give it up. You may be able to
breath new life into the lists with new hardware and/or software. I have
pet projects I love that I have had to let go recently to spend more time
with family and friends - part of getting older (for me) I think.
Also - if t
I've rectified the issue but you are right, the lists have not been stable.
I'll look into the options available on Google Groups. One thing that
people have voiced is having to be on Google to use it. This should not
really be an issue but I'll listen to those protests and make sure they are
inve
I am all for something more reliable.
Sent from my iPhone 4S.
> On Jan 27, 2014, at 2:55 PM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
>
> The list has been offline more than it's been online lately. Do we
> collectively care enough to move this group to Google or somewhere else? I
> fear the list will on
I'm all for moving it to Google Groups, as long as we can mark it
thoroughly private. I think there's some stuff that we've posted that
may be awkward in the future. No offense to Michael but Google is
somewhat more reliable than an old web app on an iffy box.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Cam
The list has been offline more than it's been online lately. Do we
collectively care enough to move this group to Google or somewhere else? I
fear the list will one day never come back from being offline. Maybe some
people won't notice, many others will.
MD: I'm not trying to give you grief over
