oh ;) no wonder I was confused.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> Twas a callback to a thread from a while ago where you did not call me an
> asshole then either
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> >
> > did I call you and asshole *again*?
> >
> > :: blink
Amen. It does ;)
/runs
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 10:43 PM, CFTodd wrote:
>
> Everyone gets lucky once in a while ;)
>
>
> Charlie Griefer wrote:
> > So wait a second here. Just wait one second.
> > Am i to understand then... that Sam's reading comprehension does not, in
> > fact, sux? :D
>
>
~
Everyone gets lucky once in a while ;)
Charlie Griefer wrote:
> So wait a second here. Just wait one second.
> Am i to understand then... that Sam's reading comprehension does not, in
> fact, sux? :D
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 so
So wait a second here. Just wait one second.
Am i to understand then... that Sam's reading comprehension does not, in
fact, sux? :D
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Judith Dinowitz
wrote:
>
> And to answer Vivec's question: No, we're not putting in any sort of
> list
And to answer Vivec's question: No, we're not putting in any sort of
list moderation. This was me reacting to what I perceived as an overly
harsh attack on Michael. I saw him fuming and I reacted...The "thin
ice" comment was probably badly worded.
I certainly didn't mean
That's exactly what it was. I perceived Judah as saying "Take your
arguments elsewhere" and I thought that was extremely obnoxious. I was
just trying to remind people that we should try to have less personal
attacks and more thoughtful discussion - in no way was I saying that I
was threatening to
Twas a callback to a thread from a while ago where you did not call me an
asshole then either
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> did I call you and asshole *again*?
>
> :: blinks ::
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> >
> > Did you call me an asshole again?
did I call you and asshole *again*?
:: blinks ::
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> Did you call me an asshole again? ;)
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> >
> > the problem with self deprecation though is that there is alway some
> > asshole
> > out there
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> "A little rudeness and disrespect can elevate a meaningless
> interaction to a battle of wills and add drama to an otherwise dull
> day."
>
>
> That is awesome.
--
Scott Stroz
---
The democracy will cease to exist when you take a
Did you call me an asshole again? ;)
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> the problem with self deprecation though is that there is alway some
> asshole
> out there who isn't playing be the same set of rules and will agree with
> you
> ;)
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Gruss Got
always glad to provide some entertainment
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> > Dana wrote:
> >
> > the problem with self deprecation though is that there is alway some
> asshole
> > out there who isn't playing be the same set of rules and will agree with
> you
>
> True en
> Dana wrote:
>
> the problem with self deprecation though is that there is alway some asshole
> out there who isn't playing be the same set of rules and will agree with you
True enough because actually my motto is:
"A little rudeness and disrespect can elevate a meaningless
interaction to a bat
the problem with self deprecation though is that there is alway some asshole
out there who isn't playing be the same set of rules and will agree with you
;)
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> > TheGriefer wrote:
> > the list owner? Surely there have been threads between Robe
> TheGriefer wrote:
> the list owner? Surely there have been threads between Robert and Gruss or
> Gruss and Sam
UH! ME???
My motto is, "That's a thoughtful opinion, I must've been mistaken
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8
ionno... every time i've been told that i'm on thin ice, it was a threat
that suggested consequences were forthcoming if i did not promptly remove
myself from said thin ice.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> I didn't see that as a threat. Just a point about how pointless his point
>
I didn't see that as a threat. Just a point about how pointless his point was :)
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Charlie Griefer
wrote:
>
> I didn't read Judah's comment as suggesting that Michael leave the list. I
> read it as more of "I'm not buying what you're selling so take it somewhere
>
I didn't read Judah's comment as suggesting that Michael leave the list. I
read it as more of "I'm not buying what you're selling so take it somewhere
else" (figuratively). Of course, it could be my comprehension that sucks...
but I give Judah the benefit of the doubt that he's intelligent enoug
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Michael Dinowitz wrote:
>
> I think it was the "go somewhere else" that got Judith upset. I've never
> used list owner as a weapon in my arguments.
You have not. Which I guess is why it was so surprising to see. Surprising
enough that it spawned a whole new t
I know my reading comprehension sux according to a few on this list but...
I read it is as a shock that someone would have the gall to tell the
list owner to leave the list, not that she wanted Judah to leave.
Do I need to re-read?
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Charlie Griefer
wrote:
>
> It'
I think it was the "go somewhere else" that got Judith upset. I've never
used list owner as a weapon in my arguments. If I can't win or hold my
ground on my own then my argument is flawed.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Charlie Griefer
wrote:
>
> It's probably safe to say tho, that lots of folk
I don't care who you are, when you discuss issues that we do here on
cf-comm, you will get emotional...you will get angry...you will sometimes IM
your friends, who are also on cf-comm, and ask them to make you stop. That
being said, I am actually surprised this is the first time I have seen such
wow i missed all this shit, wha ha happened
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Erika L. Walker wrote:
>
> Charlie said it all very eloquently and I love the list owners more than
> they know (I do, I do) - but this is how I perceived Gel's post to mean as
> well.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 5:59
Charlie said it all very eloquently and I love the list owners more than
they know (I do, I do) - but this is how I perceived Gel's post to mean as
well.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Charlie Griefer
wrote:
> But brandishing the "list owner" title made it
> feel like it isn't necessarily a
It's probably safe to say tho, that lots of folks get pissed off in a great
many of the threads here. that's part of the fun of cf-community :)
I think some of the concern that Gel is expressing, which I'll admit to
feeling myself upon seeing Judith's reply, is that... well, is there a
distinctio
I think she looked at the thread after hearing me across the room fuming at
the response that I got. She knows that if I get pissed there must be a VERY
good reason.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> I agree. This may be why I have no idea what happened in the thread; I
> really s
>
> Indeed, to participate here now, you need to have a thick skin and a
> slightly aggressive personality (or online persona at least).
*nods*
"Boy howdy!"
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic
I concur! AIR MARSHALL!!
And AIR GRETSCH to plug into it!
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
> Yeah but...but...this isn't about politics and the arguments!!
>
> Stop hijacking the thread!
>
> AIR MARSHALL!!! AIIIRRR MARSHAL!!!
>
Yeah but...but...this isn't about politics and the arguments!!
Stop hijacking the thread!
AIR MARSHALL!!! AIIIRRR MARSHAL!!!
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Tr
>> I agree. This may be why I have no idea what happened in the thread; I
>> really see no point in a discussion where I could pre-script all the
>> players.
>
> Nobody likes a quitter.
(*facepalm*)
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 softw
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 6:03 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> So I'm curious, given that thread and the responses by Judah that he
> felt he had to make because of who was posting, if we're developing a
> new policy of dealing with list discussion,
> and if so what is that policy and its associated procedur
> Dana wrote:
>
> I agree. This may be why I have no idea what happened in the thread; I
> really see no point in a discussion where I could pre-script all the
> players.
Nobody likes a quitter.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> > RoMunn wrote:
> >> Honestly, most of the political threads have gotten formulaic.
> >
> > Isn't that the truth...
> >
>
> You couldn't be more wrong about that.
>
OK that right there was funny :)
--
I have failed as much as I have succ
> RoMunn wrote:
>> Honestly, most of the political threads have gotten formulaic.
>
> Isn't that the truth...
>
You couldn't be more wrong about that.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release
I agree. This may be why I have no idea what happened in the thread; I
really see no point in a discussion where I could pre-script all the
players. I don't have time to look at the thread right now but I do deal
with Judith quite a bit on the magazine and I suspect that
a) she thought she could
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 6:12 AM, C. Hatton H wrote:
>
> Honestly, most of the political threads have gotten formulaic.
>
Isn't that the truth...
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 9:12 AM, C. Hatton Humphrey wrote:
> It takes a LOT for the List Mama to
> step in and tell us kids to behave.
I ain't your momma but...
P.L.R.U.
Peace, Love, Respect, Unity
Keep that in mind before posting, and use Mail Goggles if you can't remember
the above before
> During my tenure on this list, I have almost never seen any attempts
> from the list owners about moderating any comments, or any posts by
> any members.
I've been around a long time too. It takes a LOT for the List Mama to
step in and tell us kids to behave. The only times that I have seen
i
Hello,
I just thought I'd make a comment in a new thread on what happened in
that Afghanistan thread.
I'm one of the longest members on this mailing list, having been here
over 7 years, a very lengthy time by any account for participation in
an online community.
Over this time I've contributed t
38 matches
Mail list logo
