Re: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer

2004-04-25 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Jochem van Dieten wrote: > Tim Heald wrote: >> >> Hmm, Wonder if I should tell you about all this.  Everyone knows dot.nl is >> famous for crackers :) > > Not really. We just have the fat pipes to courier the stuff that is > cracked elsewhere. And to make this point a little bit more visible I hav

Re: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer

2004-04-23 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Tim Heald wrote: >On install of a fresh OS.  This is patching. I thought they kept a list of currently mandated patches as well. > Hmm, Wonder if I should tell you about all this.  Everyone knows dot.nl is > famous for crackers :) Not really. We just have the fat pipes to courier the stuff that

RE: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer

2004-04-22 Thread Tim Heald
: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer   Heald, Tim wrote:   >   > If you haven't used this tool you should.  I had used its gui to test   > local systems before, but damned you can do so much more than what's   > exposed through that piece of trash with either the command

Re: Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer

2004-04-22 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Heald, Tim wrote: > > If you haven't used this tool you should.  I had used its gui to test > local systems before, but damned you can do so much more than what's > exposed through that piece of trash with either the command line, or a > bit of windows script in js. Isn't the State Department

Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer

2004-04-22 Thread Heald, Tim
Wow, If you haven't used this tool you should.  I had used its gui to test local systems before, but damned you can do so much more than what's exposed through that piece of trash with either the command line, or a bit of windows script in js. Damn this thing is neat. -- Timothy Heald Web Portf