::nod: and how many of those suspected felons had names like Bob Brown?
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Maureen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In 2000, Florida did a purge of supposed felons from the voter roles.
> Problem is, they also purged people with names similar to felons.
>
> Most of us hav
In 2000, Florida did a purge of supposed felons from the voter roles.
Problem is, they also purged people with names similar to felons.
Most of us have written database queries. Would you really want voter
roles purges using this as the criteria?
delete * from voteroll where name like ('suspecte
yep ;) just interested in increasing the number of peple this applies to...
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Scott Stroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And if they show up at the polling place they are entitled to vote.
>
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> right.
That being said, I still think this kind of act, regardless of who the
perceived beneficiary is, are scum bag tactics by someone who, to me, seems
desperate
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Scott Stroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would say if you have a warrant which could lead to your arrest,
And if they show up at the polling place they are entitled to vote.
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> right. I am not in favor of DWI or of having warrants. But people
> should get to vote.
>
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Scott Stroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
right. I am not in favor of DWI or of having warrants. But people
should get to vote.
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Scott Stroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That being said, I still think this kind of act, regardless of who the
> perceived beneficiary is, are scum bag tactics by someone who, to
I would say if you have a warrant which could lead to your arrest,
regardless of the offense, that would make you a 'criminal'.
Of course there are other things that could make you a criminal as well,
such as the aforementioned underage drinking, 'recreational' drug use, etc.
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008
if failing to pay parking tickets makes you a criminal, then yes.
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Scott Stroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, so maybe my logic was a bit off. Let me see if I can get this straight.
>
> This favors Republicans becasue there are more criminals at these schools
> w
Ok, so maybe my logic was a bit off. Let me see if I can get this straight.
This favors Republicans becasue there are more criminals at these schools
who have outstanding warrants who might be inclined to vote Democratic than
those who might be inclined to vote Republican.
Did I get it right thi
there was a lot of this in Albuquerque last election and the Kerry
campaign was just not ready to address it. The Obama people say they
are ready this time. We'll see.
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Scott Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://hamptonroads.com/2008/10/phony-flier-says-virgi
>>
>I fail to see how this would benefit any single party over another.
>
Scott,
To start off with in this election cycle university students are overwhelmingly
pro-Democrat and pro-Obama. Secondly, Drexel had a huge registration drive, put
on by the Obama campaign. Suppressing this vote may go
Scott Stroz wrote:
> Following that logic might lead one to also assume that people who would be
> voting for the Democratic candidates at these schools would be more likely
> to have outstanding warrants than those wo would be voting for the
> Republican candidates.
Not necessarily. I see the lo
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Scott Stroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I fail to see how this would benefit any single party over another.
This was targeted toward college students. Take a look at polls that
break down voting preference by age and you'll see why it strongly
favors one party ov
That would be sad to call that logic.
How about logic that says that students are more likely to have unpaid
parking tickets (which was specifically mentioned in the letter as
something the cops would be looking for) because they tend to be going
to places with less available parking (like, say a
Following that logic might lead one to also assume that people who would be
voting for the Democratic candidates at these schools would be more likely
to have outstanding warrants than those wo would be voting for the
Republican candidates.
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Ian Skinner <[EMAIL PROT
Scott Stroz wrote:
> I fail to see how this would benefit any single party over another.
I would guess that most colleges tend to have a democratic leaning
student body.
Not all students and not all colleges. But many.
~|
Ad
>
> The flyer reads like a friendly letter to fellow students relaying a
> warning from an "Obama supporter": "He informed me that on the day of the
> election there will be undercover officers to execute warrants on those who
> come to vote based on the anticipated turnout," writes the anonymous s
Yeah that would be a fitting punishment, in the town that they tried to
steal the vote from.
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 11:41 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Phony election flyers surf
Another case of GOP dirty tricks, the local registrar in Montgomery County, Va.
â home to Virginia Tech University and the site of a sizeable Obama voter
registration drive â issued two press releases incorrectly suggesting that
students who register to vote at their college could lose schol
Another report on GOP related dirty tricks this election season:
http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=5963751
'Tis the Season of Election Dirty Tricks: Scaring Student Voters
Flyer Warns of Undercover Police Presence at Polls on Election Day
By AVNI PATEL
Oct. 6, 2008â
Election officials and watchdo
As they said last night on Colbert, after the election runoff between
McCain and Obama next Tuesday, the winner gets to compete in the final
against Hillary.
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Judah McAuley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wait...when's the real election?
Wait...when's the real election?
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:46 AM, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:29 AM, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I didn't actually realize it was targeted at Democrats.
>
>
> Sure it was targeted at democratsit told anyone w
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:29 AM, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I didn't actually realize it was targeted at Democrats.
Sure it was targeted at democratsit told anyone who was planning to vote
for Democratic candidates that they should vote on November 5th.
So whomever perpetra
I really wish we could bring back the stocks
Jerry Johnson wrote:
> I didn't actually realize it was targeted at Democrats.
>
> And I don't truly believe it is limited to just Republican dirty
> tactics (the extreme left wing Democrats are just as mean and
> righteous as the right)
>
> But I think
I don't think this would qualify as treason.
And rather than shot, I think a more fitting punishment would be to become
some one's bitch in prison. Being shot is just so...sudden.
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would (literally) like to see the peo
I didn't actually realize it was targeted at Democrats.
And I don't truly believe it is limited to just Republican dirty
tactics (the extreme left wing Democrats are just as mean and
righteous as the right)
But I think these people (like that Repub dirty tricks phone call guy
from NH) should be a
Any bets that these fliers were distributed in majority Democratic electoral
districts? It looks very similar to the bogus fliers that were distributed in
the last state election in democratic party majority districts. Given the
sleaziness of the Virginia Republican Party (we just received some
I wouldn't downplay the potential for this flier to cause
problemsremember, hundreds of people are still taken in by Nigerian
scams every year.think of how many times you are forwarded bogus stuff
in email from people who take everything they see on face value???
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 9:
esday, October 29, 2008 11:04 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Phony election flyers surface in Virginia
>
> I would (literally) like to see the people who made and
> circulated these tried and shot for treason.
>
> There is nothing worse from a government standpo
I would (literally) like to see the people who made and circulated
these tried and shot for treason.
There is nothing worse from a government standpoint that purposefully
sabotaging democratic elections.
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:00 AM, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wouldn't downplay th
Yeah, gotta agree there
Scott Stroz wrote:
> While this is a scumbag tactic, I have to say if you are dumb enough to fall
> for it without verification, too bad.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Scott Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>
>> http://hamptonroads.com/2008/10/phony-flier-sa
While this is a scumbag tactic, I have to say if you are dumb enough to fall
for it without verification, too bad.
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Scott Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> http://hamptonroads.com/2008/10/phony-flier-says-virginians-vote-different-days%20
>
> --
> Scott Stewa
http://hamptonroads.com/2008/10/phony-flier-says-virginians-vote-different-days%20
--
Scott Stewart
ColdFusion Developer
Office of Research Information Systems
Research & Economic Development
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Phone:(919)843-2408
Fax: (919)962-3600
Email: [EMAIL PROTEC
33 matches
Mail list logo
