Re: Public’s Views on Human Evolution |_Pew Resear ch C enter's Religion & Publi

2014-01-03 Thread Timothy Heald
That's some of why is theory. We know that natural selection/survival of the fittest isn't always true now. And that mutations occur from environmental factors and other factors we don't understand. On Jan 3, 2014 2:26 PM, "Scott Stroz" wrote: > > Not every instance of every organism would hav

Re: Public’s Views on Human Evolution |_Pew Resear ch C enter's Religion & Publi

2014-01-03 Thread Judah McAuley
Yes, very odd that the success of single cell organisms would mean that there would continue to be single cell organisms. I mean, look at the success of 4 legs. Surely that would mean that 6 legs are totally passe` and doomed to extinction. For anyone that actually wants an answer to Sam's idiocy

Re: Public’s Views on Human Evolution |_Pew Resear ch C enter's Religion & Publi

2014-01-03 Thread Sam
Interesting. But people are mostly the same. I knew a girl with six toes but other than that we're kind of similar. Seems like you're implying things can go any way yet they seem to go in the same direction. I guess I'm trying to figure out how one of my distant cousins became bacteria instead of

Re: Public’s Views on Human Evolution |_Pew Resear ch C enter's Religion & Publi

2014-01-02 Thread Larry C. Lyons
Maybe he simply didn't have the time. On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 2:35 PM, GMoney wrote: > > If you are going to give a lecture questioning the reality of timeand > you have to reschedule that lecture for...another time. > > Well, maybe there's your answer :) > > > On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 1: