I'll have to pick that up...Thanks for the tip Gruss.
-Original Message-
From: Vivec [mailto:gel21...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 21:07
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: [politics] confused about shutdown
You talking about this book?
http://www.amazon.com/Lords-Fi
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> None of this jockeying matters. Once the dollar is knocked off its
> perch as the world's reserve currency, we're Argentina. Either we get
> there by debt crisis through over-spending to maintain social
> stability, or we get there through c
Good shut-down info:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/federal-shutdowns-in-the-1990s/2011/04/01/AFB2FvIC_gallery.html
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/14302721
Vivec wrote:
>
> That is one of the more expensive Kindle books I've come across btw.
> 15 bucks! Most are at most 9.99 or something like that :)
>
> I'll consider it.
>
I got it from the same place I get all my books: the library.
However that book is so awesome I'm going to buy it (esp since
That is one of the more expensive Kindle books I've come across btw.
15 bucks! Most are at most 9.99 or something like that :)
I'll consider it.
On 5 April 2011 22:18, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> That's it! Awesome book.
>
> Leading up to it (or after) you might want to read Fault Lines.
>
> If you
It's been inevitable for decades, but it really gained momentum with
the rise of the Internet and the globalization of knowledge work.
Is there an end game? I think there are several being played by
different parties in the international community. Take OPEC.
Nominally, OPEC has a goal of maintai
Vivec wrote:
>
> You talking about this book?
>
> http://www.amazon.com/Lords-Finance-Bankers-Broke-ebook/dp/B001QIGZEK/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&m=AG56TWVU5XWC2&s=digital-text&qid=130208&sr=1-1
>
That's it! Awesome book.
Leading up to it (or after) you might want to read Fault Lines.
If you ha
You talking about this book?
http://www.amazon.com/Lords-Finance-Bankers-Broke-ebook/dp/B001QIGZEK/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&m=AG56TWVU5XWC2&s=digital-text&qid=130208&sr=1-1
On 5 April 2011 21:44, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
>
> I'm tellin y'allz, read Lords of Finance.
~~
Robert Munn wrote:
>
> None of this jockeying matters. Once the dollar is knocked off its
> perch as the world's reserve currency, we're Argentina.
I'm tellin y'allz, read Lords of Finance.
Yes it's a bit dense, but it's also great story-telling and will give
you a full understanding of everyth
Robert,
With the current economic model..wasn't this inevitable?
I've been reading about this happening for the last 10 years, and seen
articles for years before that.
The people who maneuvered the economy to this point MUST have known
what the outcome would be.
Do you think there is no end-gam
None of this jockeying matters. Once the dollar is knocked off its
perch as the world's reserve currency, we're Argentina. Either we get
there by debt crisis through over-spending to maintain social
stability, or we get there through civil unrest that topples the
government when $6 trillion in cut
Shh...you are introducing facts...it confuses him...
-Original Message-
From: Judah McAuley [mailto:ju...@wiredotter.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 14:23
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: [politics] confused about shutdown
Get caught up with what, exactly? The deficit? Wouldn't
Get caught up with what, exactly? The deficit? Wouldn't that require
the IRS to collect taxes...which is a function of the government?
Judah
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Jacob wrote:
>
> Why not.. I say shut down for a couple years. Lets get caught up.
>
> -Original Message-
> From:
An Obama Shutdown: How Could We Tell?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FL8mlqiD2TU
:)
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Jacob wrote:
>
> Why not.. I say shut down for a couple years. Lets get caught up.
>
~|
Order the Adobe Col
Why not.. I say shut down for a couple years. Lets get caught up.
-Original Message-
From: Vivec [mailto:gel21...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 9:58 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: [politics] confused about shutdown
I'm reading about this looming "Government Shutdown" but I can
Isn't that redundant?
.
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> Democrat has shown to have some mental stability issues. The Democrat
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Co
They were hired to cut the deficits and the democrats want to increase spending.
Should they compromise? The White House wants this more than anyone so
they can paint the GOP as boogeymen. Politicas being played all
around.
.
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:37 PM, G Money wrote:
> I think it would b
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 11:37 AM, G Money wrote:
> I think it would be more correct to say that: A majority of VOTING Americans
> agreed with the general idea that over the next few years, we needed to
> reign in spending, and thus voted in people who promised to do such.
I don't even know if you
or it can mean, not working without pay for a planned [day|week|month]
per [day|week|month] for x [days|weeks|months]
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Sandra Clark wrote:
>
> Furlough means not working without pay until recalled.
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
>>
>> "furlough
Furlough means not working without pay until recalled.
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
> "furloughed" is a euphemism for Fired?
>
> That sh** is scary. Especially with the already tight financial position.
>
> On the other hand, the American people voted this house in...so they
>
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
> "furloughed" is a euphemism for Fired?
>
Not reallymy dad was furloughed on two separate occasions many years
ago, but was brought back both times just as promised.
> On the other hand, the American people voted this house in...so they
> mu
"furloughed" is a euphemism for Fired?
That sh** is scary. Especially with the already tight financial position.
On the other hand, the American people voted this house in...so they
must agree with their policies.
The Tea Party wouldn't be there otherwise.
On 5 April 2011 13:29, Sandra Clark w
ed real good for them in the 90's too ;-)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: G Money [mailto:gm0n3...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 12:11
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: [politics] confused about shutdown
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Vi
That claim worked real good for them in the 90's too ;-)
-Original Message-
From: G Money [mailto:gm0n3...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 12:11
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: [politics] confused about shutdown
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
>
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> I'm reading about this looming "Government Shutdown" but I can't
> figure what the heck that means.
> I mean the government cannot *actually* shut down...
>
>
yeah, it can, for the most part...though it's not quite as harrowing as it
sounds. Happ
25 matches
Mail list logo
