Almost certainly leftovers, and it looks like there was no good inventory-
even among the Iraqis themselves- of what was where.
On 6/22/06, Howie wrote:
>
> Probably leftovers..
>
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A52241-2002Dec29?language=printer
>
> --- On Thursday, June 22, 2006 7:18
Probably leftovers..
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A52241-2002Dec29?language=printer
--- On Thursday, June 22, 2006 7:18 AM, Nick McClure scribed: ---
>
> http://www.foxnews.com/printer_friendly_story/0,3566,200499,00.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
Well, or you could say they are, just the other way ;)
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Everland III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 8:16 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: 500 WMDs found sense 2003
>
> I think it's great how Fox
> Nick wrote:
> http://www.foxnews.com/printer_friendly_story/0,3566,200499,00.html
>
Wow, the desperation is a lot higher than I thought!
"uh, yes, we did find these rusty shells that are over a decade old
and,uh, at one point they did contain something. See! WMD! WMD!"
That's truely patheti
I think it's great how Fox news seems to be the only one running with this
story at the moment as though it were a big thing. If this were such a big deal
it would be all over a bunch of papers. Not all newspapers or news programs are
as biased as Fox news. We knew they had some WMD's, we sold t
