Well, in theory, there is a third, preferred way, to balance spending: lower
taxes, keep spending the same, but spend BETTER.
Republicans like to offer this third method as a way to have your cake, and
eat it too. Problem is, this NEVER works in the real world
> Not to mention the economics
Gruss Gott wrote:
>Well, I'm still trying to decide that. One of my biggest reasons to
>vote against Mr. Bush was fiscally: you split the power you bring
>spending to zero.
>
>
Not to mention the economics of his administration. To prevent horrible
deficits, you have to balance spending and t
> Robert wrote:
> And Kerry still lost. Too bad so sad.
>
Well, I'm still trying to decide that. One of my biggest reasons to
vote against Mr. Bush was fiscally: you split the power you bring
spending to zero.
However, surprisingly, Mr. Bush has been completely ineffective thus
far with anythin
Howie Hamlin wrote:
> The new ABC News/Washington Post poll shows 52 percent of Americans
> disapprove of the job President Bush is doing overall...
while 88% disapprove of the job the Washington Post is doing...? ;-)
jd
~~
> -Original Message-
> From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 1:33 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Bush's approval rating is 48 percent
>
> Of course, as we have seen with many presidents, it takes an approval
> rati
Of course, as we have seen with many presidents, it takes an approval rating
below 40% to really make a difference.
Mostly because of the way that question was probably asked.
If 48% approve, then that doesn't directly equate to 52% disapprove. Many
could be indifferent.
> -Original Message-
> From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://msnbc.msn.com/id/8118278
Who proofreads the shit on that site? The grammar usage on that site, well,
sucks!
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer
