Re: Chinagate - was (sam, I am not saying a word)

2005-01-19 Thread Ray Champagne
Beats me... At 03:47 PM 1/19/2005, you wrote: >hatway reay ouyay alkingtay boutay? > >--- On Wednesday, January 19, 2005 3:45 PM, Dana scribed: --- > > > > this is fun, can anybody play? > > > > Raclure de bidet, tu oses parler de mouches? > > > >> I due delle forcelle sono coperti di mosche > > >

RE: Chinagate - was (sam, I am not saying a word)

2005-01-19 Thread Michael T. Tangorre
> From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > You talkin 'bout the G.W. Bush grammer and pronunseeashun > guide? I gots me one! LOL, ya don't say! ~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency b

Re: Chinagate - was (sam, I am not saying a word)

2005-01-19 Thread Dana
ABORTION On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:20:10 -0800, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, having and adult conversation with you seems to be totally out of > the question. > > Let us move on. > > HITLER. > > On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:43:57 -0500, Larry C. Lyons > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'll give

Re: Chinagate - was (sam, I am not saying a word)

2005-01-19 Thread Sam
You talkin 'bout the G.W. Bush grammer and pronunseeashun guide? I gots me one! On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:54:44 -0500, Michael T. Tangorre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > There's a difference? I thought it just depended on how much > > room you had on the page.

RE: Chinagate - was (sam, I am not saying a word)

2005-01-19 Thread Michael T. Tangorre
> From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > There's a difference? I thought it just depended on how much > room you had on the page. I guess it depends more on your political party affiliation. Maybe it's the over_republican English dialect? ~~

Re: Chinagate - was (sam, I am not saying a word)

2005-01-19 Thread Sam
There's a difference? I thought it just depended on how much room you had on the page. > I'm going to bet you actually do know the difference between AND and AN. > :-) ~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and T

RE: Chinagate - was (sam, I am not saying a word)

2005-01-19 Thread Michael T. Tangorre
> From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > So, having and adult conversation with you seems to be > totally out of the question. > > Let us move on. > > HITLER. I'm going to bet you actually do know the difference between AND and AN. :-) ~~~

Re: Chinagate - was (sam, I am not saying a word)

2005-01-19 Thread Sam
So, having and adult conversation with you seems to be totally out of the question. Let us move on. HITLER. On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:43:57 -0500, Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll give you a hint, remember what the shrub apologist was complaining about. > > larry > > On Wed, 19

Re: Chinagate - was (sam, I am not saying a word)

2005-01-19 Thread Dana
pun. Actually means two of spades. Dana On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:39:50 -0500, John Stanley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Deux de pique. > > Two piques? ;-0 ~| Protect your mail server with built in anti-virus protection. It's n

Re: Chinagate - was (sam, I am not saying a word)

2005-01-19 Thread Howie Hamlin
hatway reay ouyay alkingtay boutay? --- On Wednesday, January 19, 2005 3:45 PM, Dana scribed: --- > > this is fun, can anybody play? > > Raclure de bidet, tu oses parler de mouches? > >> I due delle forcelle sono coperti di mosche > > ~~

Re: Chinagate - was (sam, I am not saying a word)

2005-01-19 Thread Dana
like the Bill OReillys. > > Russel Madere > Webmaster > 504.832.9835 > SunShine Pages by EATEL > www.sunshinepages.com > > -Original Message- > From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 1:51 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re:

Re: Chinagate - was (sam, I am not saying a word)

2005-01-19 Thread Dana
this is fun, can anybody play? Raclure de bidet, tu oses parler de mouches? > I due delle forcelle sono coperti di mosche ~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.house

Re: Chinagate - was (sam, I am not saying a word)

2005-01-19 Thread Larry C. Lyons
I'll give you a hint, remember what the shrub apologist was complaining about. larry On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:39:50 -0500, John Stanley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Deux de pique. > > Two piques? ;-0 > > ~| Find out how CFTi

Re: Chinagate - was (sam, I am not saying a word)

2005-01-19 Thread Kevin Graeme
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:11:59 -0700, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Me: Haile Berry was caught on video doing Julia Roberts Ew. Link? -Kevin ~| This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The pl

RE: Chinagate - was (sam, I am not saying a word)

2005-01-19 Thread John Stanley
>>Deux de pique. Two piques? ;-0 ~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.c

Re: Chinagate - was (sam, I am not saying a word)

2005-01-19 Thread Larry C. Lyons
Deux de pique. On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:22:51 -0800, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Did you forget to take your meds today? > > > On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:11:59 -0700, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ::light bulb:: maybe I should just start doing the same thing > > > > Sam: blah blah blah Hus

RE: Chinagate - was (sam, I am not saying a word)

2005-01-19 Thread Michael T. Tangorre
> From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I'm going to bet your not mature enough to apologize :) > > I due delle forcelle sono coperti di mosche I'm going to bet you actually do know the difference between YOUR and YOU'RE :-) ~~~

Re: Chinagate - was (sam, I am not saying a word)

2005-01-19 Thread Sam
I'm going to bet your not mature enough to apologize :) I due delle forcelle sono coperti di mosche > Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But then again Clinton is a good scape goat for republican apologists. > By blaming him it covers all sorts of lack of thinking. ~~~

Re: Chinagate - was (sam, I am not saying a word)

2005-01-19 Thread Sam
You're right, we do speak different dialects. On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:16:33 -0700, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nipples to you. It's a favoured Pamela Anderson tactic of yours and > you Haile Berry know it. > > dana > > ~|

RE: Chinagate - was (sam, I am not saying a word)

2005-01-19 Thread Russel Madere
To: CF-Community Subject: Re: Chinagate - was (sam, I am not saying a word) why do you always bring up clinton when bush is criticized? I don't have time to look at the links right nw -- though I may later -- but isn't the point what bush is doing now? And possibly could be prevented fro

Re: Chinagate - was (sam, I am not saying a word)

2005-01-19 Thread Sam
Did you forget to take your meds today? On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:11:59 -0700, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ::light bulb:: maybe I should just start doing the same thing > > Sam: blah blah blah Hussein massacres WMD imminent danger > > Me: Pamela Anderson is planning to breastfeed her first

Re: Chinagate - was (sam, I am not saying a word)

2005-01-19 Thread Dana
Nipples to you. It's a favoured Pamela Anderson tactic of yours and you Haile Berry know it. dana On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:11:47 -0800, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wasn't me, it was Ken. > > Ken: > "I think back to the constant attacks on Clinton and his staff and > supporters. They were at

Re: Chinagate - was (sam, I am not saying a word)

2005-01-19 Thread Dana
::light bulb:: maybe I should just start doing the same thing Sam: blah blah blah Hussein massacres WMD imminent danger Me: Pamela Anderson is planning to breastfeed her first child Sam: You're an idot. You're all idots. Just wait, pretty soon you won't have Sam to kick around any more. Me: Hai

Re: Chinagate - was (sam, I am not saying a word)

2005-01-19 Thread Sam
Wasn't me, it was Ken. Ken: "I think back to the constant attacks on Clinton and his staff and supporters. They were attacked from a every possible angle at every opportunity. Much of which was just bs. Then Bush and the good 'ol boys get in and they are beyond reproach. It kills me. Bush and

Re: Chinagate - was (sam, I am not saying a word)

2005-01-19 Thread Charlie Griefer
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:50:55 -0700, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > why do you always bring up clinton when bush is criticized? I don't > have time to look at the links right nw -- though I may later -- but > isn't the point what bush is doing now? And possibly could be > prevented from doing if

Re: Chinagate - was (sam, I am not saying a word)

2005-01-19 Thread Dana
why do you always bring up clinton when bush is criticized? I don't have time to look at the links right nw -- though I may later -- but isn't the point what bush is doing now? And possibly could be prevented from doing if enough people paid attention? I am beginning to suspect that this is the poi