RE: DoD Engineering Superiority

2009-02-24 Thread Scott Raley -ITC
...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 4:03 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: DoD Engineering Superiority Your question assumes that our technology hasn't already been sold to others, when we know that spies have in the past sold our technology to the Chinese and the Russians, for instance.

Re: DoD Engineering Superiority

2009-02-23 Thread Maureen
http://www.nsa.gov/careers/ Virtual Career Fair tomorrow. On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Paul Ihrig wrote: > > any one got a link to an application.. > figure i can save the gov some monitoring money if they pay me to look > at myself..

Re: DoD Engineering Superiority

2009-02-23 Thread Paul Ihrig
ail.com] > Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 8:19 PM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: DoD Engineering Superiority > > > ok.. > who is hiring? > > > > ~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most impo

RE: DoD Engineering Superiority

2009-02-23 Thread Scott Raley -ITC
NSA... 1000 jobs to fill -Original Message- From: Paul Ihrig [mailto:pih...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 8:19 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: DoD Engineering Superiority ok.. who is hiring? ~| Adobe®

Re: DoD Engineering Superiority

2009-02-23 Thread Paul Ihrig
ok.. who is hiring? ~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-co

Re: DoD Engineering Superiority

2009-02-23 Thread Dana
NSA On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Scott Raley -ITC wrote: > > Who would that be > > -Original Message- > From: Dana [mailto:dana.tier...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 2:59 PM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: DoD Engineering Superiority > &g

RE: DoD Engineering Superiority

2009-02-23 Thread Scott Raley -ITC
I would say bite me, but we know that's one of the hobbies you enjoy. -Original Message- From: Erika L. Walker [mailto:elwal...@ruwebby.com] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 4:10 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: DoD Engineering Superiority Scott doesn't troll, he's ju

Re: DoD Engineering Superiority

2009-02-23 Thread Scott Stewart
c.edu] > Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 4:01 PM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: DoD Engineering Superiority > > > Either Pax River or the Naval Research Lab (but I though that was off of > 295) > > Scott Raley -ITC wrote: > >> Who would that be >&g

Re: DoD Engineering Superiority

2009-02-23 Thread Robert Munn
yes, it's nsa. i grew up in that area. On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 1:02 PM, morgan l wrote: > > A quick google check appears to point to the NSA headquarters at Fort > Meade. > ~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most import

RE: DoD Engineering Superiority

2009-02-23 Thread Scott Raley -ITC
No, I'm close to Pax and 198 no where near me. -Original Message- From: Scott Stewart [mailto:saste...@email.unc.edu] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 4:01 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: DoD Engineering Superiority Either Pax River or the Naval Research Lab (but I though that wa

Re: DoD Engineering Superiority

2009-02-23 Thread Erika L. Walker
Scott doesn't troll, he's just a weird dude with a weird way to have a conversation. One gets used to him eventually. It only took me 9 years On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Michael Grant wrote: > > I was wondering the same thing. I think he's trolling. Anyone who responds > negatively gets

Re: DoD Engineering Superiority

2009-02-23 Thread Scott Stewart
Either Pax River or the Naval Research Lab (but I though that was off of 295) Scott Raley -ITC wrote: > Who would that be > > -Original Message- > From: Dana [mailto:dana.tier...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 2:59 PM > To: cf-community > Subject

Re: DoD Engineering Superiority

2009-02-23 Thread Charlie Griefer
5 PM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: DoD Engineering Superiority > > > What's with this cryptic-ass thread? Did I miss something? > > > On Feb 23, 2009, at 2:39 PM, Scott Raley -ITC wrote: > > > > > Who would that be > > > > -Original Message

Re: DoD Engineering Superiority

2009-02-23 Thread Robert Munn
Your question assumes that our technology hasn't already been sold to others, when we know that spies have in the past sold our technology to the Chinese and the Russians, for instance. More importantly, the US is still the global center of innovation. While we may not turn out as many number-cru

RE: DoD Engineering Superiority

2009-02-23 Thread Scott Raley -ITC
Oh yeah.. NSA has a 1000 job openings.. think we should all apply -Original Message- From: Michael Grant [mailto:mgr...@modus.bz] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 3:51 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: DoD Engineering Superiority I was wondering the same thing. I think he's tro

Re: DoD Engineering Superiority

2009-02-23 Thread morgan l
> To: cf-community > Subject: Re: DoD Engineering Superiority > > > this requires the help of those folks out at the east end of MD 198. > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Cameron Childress > wrote: > > > > > If is can actually see whether or not I am currently

Re: DoD Engineering Superiority

2009-02-23 Thread Michael Grant
at 2:39 PM, Scott Raley -ITC wrote: > > > > > Who would that be > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Dana [mailto:dana.tier...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 2:59 PM > > To: cf-community > > Subject: Re: DoD Engineering Super

RE: DoD Engineering Superiority

2009-02-23 Thread Scott Raley -ITC
Just asking a question. -Original Message- From: Ray Champagne [mailto:r...@raychampagne.com] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 3:45 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: DoD Engineering Superiority What's with this cryptic-ass thread? Did I miss something? On Feb 23, 2009, at 2:

RE: DoD Engineering Superiority

2009-02-23 Thread Scott Raley -ITC
That we can and continue to build the best war machines -Original Message- From: William Bowen [mailto:william.bo...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 2:52 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: DoD Engineering Superiority > Everyone here who thinks U.S. DoD Engineering is st

Re: DoD Engineering Superiority

2009-02-23 Thread Ray Champagne
What's with this cryptic-ass thread? Did I miss something? On Feb 23, 2009, at 2:39 PM, Scott Raley -ITC wrote: > > Who would that be > > -Original Message- > From: Dana [mailto:dana.tier...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 2:59 PM > To: cf-co

RE: DoD Engineering Superiority

2009-02-23 Thread Scott Raley -ITC
et sold to others. -Original Message- From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:jmi...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 3:05 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: DoD Engineering Superiority I have no idea what this thread means, but I will raise my hand. DoD engineers are way out ahead of most a

RE: DoD Engineering Superiority

2009-02-23 Thread Scott Raley -ITC
Who would that be -Original Message- From: Dana [mailto:dana.tier...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 2:59 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: DoD Engineering Superiority this requires the help of those folks out at the east end of MD 198. On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:28 PM

Re: DoD Engineering Superiority

2009-02-23 Thread Jerry Johnson
I have no idea what this thread means, but I will raise my hand. DoD engineers are way out ahead of most anyone else (usually by a decade or more) I _do_ know that I would trust a nuclear submarine in the hands of Navy F&#$%ing Nukes in my backyard way before I would trust a civilian run reactor

Re: DoD Engineering Superiority

2009-02-23 Thread Dana
this requires the help of those folks out at the east end of MD 198. On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Cameron Childress wrote: > > If is can actually see whether or not I am currently raising my hand, > it is superior. > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Scott Raley -ITC > wrote: > > Everyone

Re: DoD Engineering Superiority

2009-02-23 Thread William Bowen
> Everyone here who thinks U.S. DoD Engineering is still superior raise your > hand! Superior in what respect? -- will "If my life weren't funny, it would just be true; and that would just be unacceptable." - Carrie Fisher ~|

Re: DoD Engineering Superiority

2009-02-23 Thread Cameron Childress
If is can actually see whether or not I am currently raising my hand, it is superior. On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Scott Raley -ITC wrote: > Everyone here who thinks U.S. DoD Engineering is still superior raise your > hand! ~~~