Limited to just one pencil?
On 9/27/05, Gruss Gott wrote:
> Can we get back to calling Bush the Statue of Limitations? I'm really
> enjoying that.
~|
Purchase Homesite Plus with Dreamweaver from House of Fusion, a Macromedia
Au
> Sam wrote:
> Funny thing is you're wrong :)
>
Can we get back to calling Bush the Statue of Limitations? I'm really
enjoying that.
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble
Ticket application
http:/
Funny thing is you're wrong :)
http://www.rainn.org/statutesoflimitationcrim.html
Statutes of limitation for prosecuting rape and/or sexual assault
Arkansas
Limitation: The prosecution of a felony rape is to commence within six
years after the commission of the offense. DNA Exception: The period
In many jurisdictions that is now correct, but in the past it wasn't.
And it isn't global yet.
And any crime is only prosecutable by the laws in effect at the time
of the crime.
On 9/27/05, Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Funny thing is that the the statute of limitations is not appli
Very true. But you can't just turn your back and quit watching them. That
was Clinton's mistake. He seemed to take them at their word and then forget
about them. At least this administration is engaging them.
I know we aren't invading, you know that toobut these Il'sthey're a
parano
> Brian wrote:
> There is no punchline...only the sad fact that Clinton's sunshine policy
> towards North Korea
You say that as if there's an alternative. The current policy is
really just the Sunshine policy with meaningless tough talk. New
name, same effect.
Let's fact it - we're not invading
Funny thing is that the the statute of limitations is not applicable
to certain crimes, including rape.
Although Statue of Limitations seems particularly appropriate to the shrubbery.
larry
On 9/27/05, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sam wrote:
> > Statue of limitations
> >
>
> Let's l
> Sam wrote:
> Statue of limitations
>
Let's leave the centerpiece of your Bush shrine out of this.
~|
Get the mailserver that powers this list at
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=17
Message: http://www.ho
There is no punchline...only the sad fact that Clinton's sunshine policy
towards North Korea, galvanized with that 1994 (think that was the year)
accord he signed, has left the world in a really dangerous situation.
NK used that accord to ramp up their clandestine nuke program, while the
United
Not me, the children and it starts with Clinton. This President has
the opportunity to change the perception but according to the left he
made it worse.
Where's Gruss anyway, it's his point :)
I was just saying it wasn't lying about a BJ that created the distrust
it was why he had to lie about it.
MAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 2:06 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: Fw: Breaking News - Anti-war protester Cindy
> > Sheehan arrested outside White House
> >
> > yeah he was in Afghanistan. I actually don't recall a Juanita
> &g
You mean the Schiavo thing?
I think I was back for the ass end of it, but stayed far away form it.
> -Original Message-
> From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 2:06 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Fw: Breaking News - Anti-war
/me examines this from all sides looking for the punch line...
On 9/27/05, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > yeah, that's the key issue. I think he was an ok president, even if I
> > wouldn't let him close to my thirteen year old daughter.
> >
> > Dana
> >
>
> .or to a North Korean security
> yeah, that's the key issue. I think he was an ok president, even if I
> wouldn't let him close to my thirteen year old daughter.
>
> Dana
>
.or to a North Korean security treaty.
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase yo
So you are saying that Bill Clinton's sexual escapades make you
distrust George Bush? Or look back at Ronald Reagan and Thomas
Jefferson and distrust them? That the seal of the President is somehow
forever tarnished?
You think that the next President will have a harder time at his job
because of w
Now that's defamation of character. This is the first mention I've
heard of him being a pedophile. What facts do you base this on?
:P
On 9/27/05, Dana wrote:
> yeah, that's the key issue. I think he was an ok president, even if I
> wouldn't let him close to my thirteen year old daughter.
>
> Dana
I think it works out the same.
On 9/27/05, Jerry Johnson wrote:
> But is it distrust for the President, or distrust for the Presidency?
>
> Gruss was talking about distrust for the institution of President.
~|
All-in-one: antivir
yeah, that's the key issue. I think he was an ok president, even if I
wouldn't let him close to my thirteen year old daughter.
Dana
On 9/27/05, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> But is it distrust for the President, or distrust for the Presidency?
>
> Gruss was talking about distrust
But is it distrust for the President, or distrust for the Presidency?
Gruss was talking about distrust for the institution of President.
On 9/27/05, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's where distrust for the President is that GG was talking about
> in my opinion.
statue and statute.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Matthew Small [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 1:45 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: RE: Fw: Breaking News - Anti-war protester Cindy
> > Sheehan arrested outsi
I did not make a libelous statement, I'm just referring to what she
stated publicly.
Innocent until proven guilty is fine but when there's a pattern of
improper sexual behavior, proven lies to cover them up and then paying
off an accuser, it's hard to honestly think Bill Clinton is a victim.
That'
To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Fw: Breaking News - Anti-war protester Cindy
> Sheehan arrested outside White House
>
> Nope, that doesn't look like a defense to me. Quite the opposite.
>
> Matthew Small
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Timothy Heald [ma
yeah he was in Afghanistan. I actually don't recall a Juanita so I can't
say. This is true of most rape allegations however, unless the woman is
unbalanced or has an agenda. I'm willing to believe he's a sleaze, but I
guess I make a distinction between hypocritical sleaze in the course of
employmen
, Matthew Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Nope, that doesn't look like a defense to me. Quite the opposite.
> >
> > Matthew Small
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Timothy Heald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: T
That is the point as to why there are no criminal charges. As for the
proof, there's no reason not to believe her and no reason to believe
Clinton. She gained nothing by coming forward.
I guess Tim missed the whole Terry thread :)
On 9/27/05, Dana wrote:
> No ;) I said that in addition to his typ
w Small
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Timothy Heald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 1:43 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Fw: Breaking News - Anti-war protes
w Small
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Timothy Heald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 1:43 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Fw: Breaking News - Anti-war protes
Maybe that's why I didn't get it. :)
On 9/27/05, Timothy Heald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Omg,
>|
>|
> Did you just defend Sam? I mean right there \ /
>
t; V
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 1:36 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: Fw: Breaking News - Anti-war protester Cindy
> > Sheehan arrested outside White House
> >
>
From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 1:36 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Fw: Breaking News - Anti-war protester Cindy
> Sheehan arrested outside White House
>
> What does that have to do with anything anyway, assuming he
> means stat
And, until recently, wearing a drape around her bosom.
--- On Tuesday, September 27, 2005 1:37 PM, Sam scribed: ---
>
> Yeah, you know the one where the lady is blindfolded and holding a
> scale?
>
> On 9/27/05, Howie Hamlin wrote:
>> Statue?
>>
>
>
~~
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 1:36 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Fw: Breaking News - Anti-war protester Cindy
> Sheehan arrested outside White House
>
> What does that have to do with anything anyway, assuming he
> means statute?
> Sam is no
What do you mean?
On 9/27/05, Dana wrote:
> What does that have to do with anything anyway, assuming he means statute?
> Sam is not a court of law.
>
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support
efficien
Yeah, you know the one where the lady is blindfolded and holding a scale?
On 9/27/05, Howie Hamlin wrote:
> Statue?
>
~|
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place
for dependable ColdFusion Ho
What does that have to do with anything anyway, assuming he means statute?
Sam is not a court of law.
On 9/27/05, Howie Hamlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Statue?
>
> --- On Tuesday, September 27, 2005 1:18 PM, Sam scribed: ---
> >
> > Statue of limitations
> >
> > On 9/27/05, Jerry Johnson wro
Statue?
--- On Tuesday, September 27, 2005 1:18 PM, Sam scribed: ---
>
> Statue of limitations
>
> On 9/27/05, Jerry Johnson wrote:
>> Sam, where are the criminal charges? Where is the conviction?
>>
>> You can't say this was not scrutinized with every effort by the
>> Republican dirt machine, s
+10
On 9/27/05, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I support Chris Rock in his piece on Clinton. It's Hillary's fault. If she
> was giving him what he needed, he wouldn't have to go to anyone else. One
> of
> a wife's jobs is to stop a husband from straying. Clinton should have had
>
I support Chris Rock in his piece on Clinton. It's Hillary's fault. If she
was giving him what he needed, he wouldn't have to go to anyone else. One of
a wife's jobs is to stop a husband from straying. Clinton should have had
his wife there to run interference and give him the blow jobs rather t
Statue of limitations
On 9/27/05, Jerry Johnson wrote:
> Sam, where are the criminal charges? Where is the conviction?
>
> You can't say this was not scrutinized with every effort by the
> Republican dirt machine, so where is the evidence?
>
> (Not that I am saying he did not do it. Rape is often
If true it is bad. But doesn't change my perception of Clinton as a flawed
man who was an effective president.
Dana
On 9/27/05, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You're saying that it doesn't matter that a President Of The United
> States of America raped Juanita Brodderick and got away with it
It is not necessarily disrespectful to disagree with your children. I
disagree with mine all the time, ie "No I will not turn down my Satriani and
no, I will not download Ashley Simpson for you!" ;P
Dana
On 9/27/05, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> She disrespects the memory of he
Sam, where are the criminal charges? Where is the conviction?
You can't say this was not scrutinized with every effort by the
Republican dirt machine, so where is the evidence?
(Not that I am saying he did not do it. Rape is often a he said-she said crime.)
But Sam, back up your allegations with
You're saying that it doesn't matter that a President Of The United
States of America raped Juanita Brodderick and got away with it?
What sort of example does that send to the people, if you get a raped
by a Governor shut up or the press will ruin your life?
On 9/26/05, Dana wrote:
> Doesn't matt
Touche'
Sam wrote:
> Based on the pencil holder you just purchased I'm guessing it's "do".
>
> On 9/27/05, Ray Champagne wrote:
>
>>LOLso I did. :)
>>
>>For the record, unless we get a woman pres, I would just like to "be".
>>And Hillary doesn't count as a woman. :)
>>
>
>
>
~~
Based on the pencil holder you just purchased I'm guessing it's "do".
On 9/27/05, Ray Champagne wrote:
> LOLso I did. :)
>
> For the record, unless we get a woman pres, I would just like to "be".
> And Hillary doesn't count as a woman. :)
>
~~
How is Watergate any worse than Filegate or Sockgate?
The BJ isn't what caused disrespect, it's the pattern of abuse towards
women. Monica was willing, many others weren't.
On 9/27/05, Howie Hamlin wrote:
> Not to belittle what Clinton did but he just got caught doing it. There were
> many othe
I think there are certain perks that go with any job.
I think that many of the personality types that crave top positions
consider power an aphrodesiac, and use it as a tool to pursue their
favorite hobby.
Others get free plane trips, the best wines with dinner, or duck
hunting trips. Clinton wan
>I just don't get why you are so upset by this.
I'm not upset. I actually think it was hilarious he was getting a BJ whilst
on the phone. But if someone were to say "Hey, that's wrong, what if he
missed something important?" I'd have to agree with them. Wouldn't you?
> How did his getting oral
I didn't say that. I said it was rude. Which it is. So is eating while
you are talking on the phone. So is reading your email while talking
on the phone.
On 9/27/05, Timothy Heald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Getting a BJ while on the phone is wrong. Even if it was from his wife,
> which this
I just don't get why you are so upset by this.
How did his getting oral sex affect your life in any way? In any way whatsoever?
I agree that the Egyptian leader should have been miffed.
I agree that Monica's parents should have been upset.
I agree that Hillary should have removed the offending pa
I mean you have to cut some seriously messed up deals just to
get there.
Tim
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 11:46 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Fw: Breaking News - Anti-war protester Cind
Uh. i agree with all that you are saying, but i don't know WHY you are
saying it.
Jerry said he thought getting a BJ while on the phone with a head of state
was just part of being president, and somehow less unsettling than Reagan's
naps or Bush's misunderstanding of common worker tools. I thou
"Getting a BJ while on the phone is wrong. Even if it was from his wife,
which this clearly was not. It is rude to the person you are talking to and
distracts you from the task at hand."
Come on man, you've NEVER done that?
Tim
~
> For the President to consult an astrologer, it disturbs me that
> national policy may be decided on such esoteric advice.
Yet, the fact that foreign policy discussion could be occurring while the
Prez is getting head...doesn't disturb you? Or somehow disturbs you
LESS? We don't know what w
You mean that authorizing your assistants to deliberately break US law
isn't egregious? I'm referring here to Iran-Contra and Ronnie Raygun.
Also there was evidence that George Bush Sr. also knew and approved
funding and authorizing flights to Iran and exchanging anti-air
missles for fire arms to b
We were talking about things that make me lose respect for the
INSTITUTION or SYMBOL of the Presidency.
Getting a BJ while on the phone is wrong. Even if it was from his
wife, which this clearly was not. It is rude to the person you are
talking to and distracts you from the task at hand.
But my u
Reminds me of an old knock knock joke :)
--- On Tuesday, September 27, 2005 11:33 AM, Matthew Small scribed: ---
>
> Sure it is. Eisenhower did it too.
>
> Matthew Small
>
>
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company'
Sure it is. Eisenhower did it too.
Matthew Small
-Original Message-
From: G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 11:20 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Fw: Breaking News - Anti-war protester Cindy Sheehan arrested
outside White House
>I would include
LOLso I did. :)
For the record, unless we get a woman pres, I would just like to "be".
And Hillary doesn't count as a woman. :)
Ian Skinner wrote:
> "I want to president!"
>
> Ray, I think you left out a critical verb there, was it "be" or "do"?
>
> D&R
>
> --
> Ian Skinner
"I want to president!"
Ray, I think you left out a critical verb there, was it "be" or "do"?
D&R
--
Ian Skinner
Web Programmer
BloodSource
www.BloodSource.org
Sacramento, CA
"C code. C code run. Run code run. Please!"
- Cynthia Dunning
Confidentiality Notice: This message includi
> Okso.taking naps, consulting an astrologer, and misunderstanding a
> barcode reader.are all egregious acts for a president.but
> receiving a BJ while on the phone with another head of stateis just part
> of being president?
I want to president!
~
>I would include in that Reagan's astrologer, his being asleep during
> crucial meetings, Haig saying "I'm in charge" after Reagan was
> tragically shot. Bush Sr. not knowing what a barcode reader was for at
> the grocery.
>
> I actually think what Clinton did was perfectly in keeping with the
> ro
I would include in that Reagan's astrologer, his being asleep during
crucial meetings, Haig saying "I'm in charge" after Reagan was
tragically shot. Bush Sr. not knowing what a barcode reader was for at
the grocery.
I actually think what Clinton did was perfectly in keeping with the
role of Presid
Not to belittle what Clinton did but he just got caught doing it. There were
many other impropieties involving women in other administrations. The
difference is that the media used to look past those things and Linda Tripp
wasn't around as well...
But, if I had to pick out a greater evil then
Well, the mission was to rescue the hostages. If we just wanted to take out
the armed students then that would have been an entirely different operation.
It's not easy rescuing captives under those circumstances.
Howie
--- On Tuesday, September 27, 2005 10:36 AM, Jerry Johnson scribed: ---
>
> Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Clinton started the distrust of Government? Really?
>
Yes, maybe I should change that line to "erosion of institutional confidence."
That is, there has always been mistrust of government. You're a bad
American, IMO, if you don't. What Pres Clinton di
Exactly. I remember at the time of the Iran Hostage Crisis a general
feeling of unease with our government, and then a feeling of panic and
anger when the rescue mission went awry and people realized that there
was little our government and military could do against a couple
hundred armed students.
She disrespects the memory of her son by saying that the choices he made,
the lives he saved and the job he volunteered for was all for nothing. He
didn't think that it was for nothing.
> She might be a wack job now through the death of her son.
> If she was unstable before that could certainly
Nothing? :)
> Carter? What did he do???
>
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49
Message: http://www.houseoffusion
Carter? What did he do???
--- On Tuesday, September 27, 2005 10:19 AM, Jerry Johnson scribed: ---
>
> Clinton started the distrust of Government? Really?
>
> I thought it might have been Nixon. Or Carter. Or the Iran-Contra
> issue. Or the Teapot Dome scandal. Or "Read my lips. No new taxes". Or
Clinton started the distrust of Government? Really?
I thought it might have been Nixon. Or Carter. Or the Iran-Contra
issue. Or the Teapot Dome scandal. Or "Read my lips. No new taxes". Or
Senator Bob Pack-Wood. Gary Hart? Chappaquidick? A KKK member in the
White House?
Yep, distrusting governmen
Even if that were true most people have an idea of what Watergate was about.
And, I would hope that they appreciated the seriousness of the incident. Also,
Iran-Contra happened not that long ago and that was another serious incident
(read criminal).
Howie
--- On Tuesday, September 27, 2005 8
Reagan and Bush honest and trustworthy
What about the Tower Commission, Iran Contra (strict and willing
violation of US laws with the full knowledge of the sitting
president), the entire Nicaragua conflict, at one point Bush Sr. had 4
cabinet members under investigation.
And then there is Nixon..
Most of us on this list can't even remember that, it's from a bygone era.
Matthew Small
-Original Message-
From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 6:57 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Fw: Breaking News - Anti-war protester Cindy Sheeha
> Howie wrote:
> Yeah, previous presidents were so honest. Take Tricky Dick for example...
>
Yes, but we had a good stretch in terms of trust: Ford, Carter,
Reagan, Bush. Of course Pres. Reagan had the Iran-Contra thing but
that was, really, a much lesser offense the Mr. Bush's fake war. That
i
Yeah, previous presidents were so honest. Take Tricky Dick for example...
--- On Monday, September 26, 2005 6:10 PM, Gruss Gott scribed: ---
>
> and, to be fair, Pres. Clinton started the distrust of gov't.
>
>
~|
Find out how
Doesn't matter really. For me, it started with Nixon. Only a Republican
could overlook that in favor of bedroom escapades ;)
Dana
On 9/26/05, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think he's talking about sexually abusing Paula Jones or was he
> talking about Kathleen Wiley? Maybe it was Juanita
I think he's talking about sexually abusing Paula Jones or was he
talking about Kathleen Wiley? Maybe it was Juanita Broderick. :)
On 9/26/05, Dana wrote:
> blow job blow job blow job
>
> On 9/26/05, Gruss Gott wrote:
> >
> > I think many people feel like there's not much they can trust anymore
>
blow job blow job blow job
On 9/26/05, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Dana wrote:
> > I wonder how many other kids who might have wanted to serve
> > their country will not because they don't want to be in the next Iraq.
>
> It's even broader than that, most American institutions have
She might be a wack job now through the death of her son.
If she was unstable before that could certainly push someone over the edge.
Poor woman. She's probably heartbroken and this whole thing burying
herself in this 'protest, an escape or an outlet from facing that he's
never coming back.
Sad.
> Dana wrote:
> I wonder how many other kids who might have wanted to serve
> their country will not because they don't want to be in the next Iraq.
It's even broader than that, most American institutions have been crumbling:
* Catholic Church (being naughty)
* Supreme Court (deciding elections)
y are called, but can't see how invoking chaos in a
> country that was stable, even if hostile, can possibly bring a greater
> good
> for our nation.
>
> Matthew Small
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, September
taken into custody. She stood up and was led to a
> > police vehicle while protesters chanted: "The whole world is watching."
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 2:11 PM
> > To: C
G wrote:
> I'm so sick of this inconsequential news story...i'm numb.
Try search term "fenton communications"... they're very, very successful
at what they do, and their low profile is in itself remarkable, considering.
(Me, I *still* think Cindy Sheehan may be a Karl Rove mole in his
classic "
I would watch that!
More to the point, look at this picture:
http://tinyurl.com/cfxsv
She looks like she's drunk and crowd-surfing at Coachella. Now come on, is this
really a serious news story?
>I wasn't watching.
>
>Cindy could be dipped in honey and fed to grizzly bears and I wouldn't
>bl
I didn't start this thread.
You seem to be idolizing her as your new symbol of what's wrong with
this Prez. Now that you realize she's not the perfect spokesperson you
wag you're finger at me for attacking her.
She wanted to be arrested; she wants to be your anti-war symbol. Most
people ignore he
It's only Monday, go easy on me.
Are you saying I quit my job to become a Sheehan Spokesman?
How did you arrive at that conclusion? I thought you wanted to be her
spokesperson and I was just explaining what your new position
represents. :)
On 9/26/05, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Gave up your coding car
On 9/26/05, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ray said it best, ignoring her is a win-win.
Yes, you are right.
> That old law of unintended consequences ... the PR crazy neo-cons, in
> their zeal to vilify everyone, just can't seem to stop invoking it.
Also correct, though neo-cons are fa
> Cameron wrote:
> I was ambililant before, but after reading that wiki page I
> am totally and completely sure she's a wack-job.
>
Ray said it best, ignoring her is a win-win.
The irony to Sam's posting is that he elevates her from loony nutjob
to political icon by posting implicit disagreements
> Sam wrote:
> If you support her views than you agree:
> - Israel should get out of Palestine
> Blah Blah Blah
Gave up your coding career for Sheehan Spokesman? Bold move. But ...
sometimes boldness is genius.
~|
Get the mails
> Brian wrote:
> I just think she's annoying, and is nothing more than a symbol of how
> frickin' annoying people can be.
>
LOL! Do we really need any more of those symbols?
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's c
Yeah, I was just reading that wiki posting too. It's definitely a
compelling bit of text supporting the fact that Sheehan is a total
nutcase. I was ambililant before, but after reading that wiki page I
am totally and completely sure she's a wack-job.
-Cameron
On 9/26/05, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cute, but I got it from here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cindy_Sheehan
On 9/26/05, Cameron Childress wrote:
> Words straight from Bill Oreilly's mouth (cept the orleans part):
> http://www.foxnews.com.edgesuite.net/story/0,2933,170195,00.html
>
~
Words straight from Bill Oreilly's mouth (cept the orleans part):
http://www.foxnews.com.edgesuite.net/story/0,2933,170195,00.html
On 9/26/05, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sheehan seems to be doing more harm to the Dems than to Bush.
> She even forced Hillary Clinton to support the war.
> If y
Sheehan seems to be doing more harm to the Dems than to Bush.
She even forced Hillary Clinton to support the war.
If you support her views than you agree:
- Israel should get out of Palestine
- we should not have attacked Afghanistan
- Iraqi insurgents are freedom fighters
- we should not have occu
w Small
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 3:03 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Fw: Breaking News - Anti-war protester Cindy Sheehan arrested
> outside White House
>
> I dunnoAmericans lo
ct: Re: Fw: Breaking News - Anti-war protester Cindy Sheehan arrested
outside White House
I dunnoAmericans love to take people and turn them into "relevant
symbols". Sheehan is a "symbol" of how evil Bush is...or Sheehan is a
"symbol" of how nutty th
I have this vision of her standing outside the White House and being
told not to touch the security fence and then her standing there for
half an hour with her finger an inch from the fence chanting "Not
touching! Not touching! Not touching! Not touching!".
I do see a similarity between protesters
I dunnoAmericans love to take people and turn them into "relevant
symbols". Sheehan is a "symbol" of how evil Bush is...or Sheehan is a
"symbol" of how nutty the left is
I just think she's annoying, and is nothing more than a symbol of how
frickin' annoying people can be.
> Ha
an was the first taken into custody. She stood up and was led to a
> police vehicle while protesters chanted: "The whole world is watching."
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 2:11 PM
> To: CF-
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
