Didn't we do that during the riots they had?
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:grussg...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 4:27 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Iran planning to send ships near U.S. waters
That would be a great opportunity to show the Ir
afari [mailto:rastaf...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 10:26 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Iran planning to send ships near U.S. waters
>
>
> #ithinktheyareTHATcrazy
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfu
They may be crazy, but they aren't stupid...that would be a better phrase
-Original Message-
From: Ras Tafari [mailto:rastaf...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 10:26 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Iran planning to send ships near U.S. waters
#ithinktheyareTHAT
That would be a great opportunity to show the Iranian people our satellite
surveillance technology
On Sep 28, 2011, at 8:57 AM, Scott Stewart wrote:
>
> I think one of their own vessels will sink just fine by itself without
> them having to scuttle it... they'll still blame it on us tho..
>
>> I think it will be much ado about nothing. Iran may want to beat it's chest
>> a bit but they aren't going to do anything that's going to get
>> them annihilated. They may be crazy, but they aren't that crazy.
>
>
>The rules of engagement at sea at pretty well defined and the US has a ton
>of e
>There is no way this ends well.
>
>On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Camer
>>
At least one of them though the end was well...
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430
I think one of their own vessels will sink just fine by itself without
them having to scuttle it... they'll still blame it on us tho..
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> Never said they would 'attack' However, I think they ARE crazy enough
> to sink one of their own vessel
Never said they would 'attack' However, I think they ARE crazy enough
to sink one of their own vessels and try to blaem us
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Medic wrote:
>
> I think it will be much ado about nothing. Iran may want to beat it's chest
> a bit but they aren't going to do anything t
Agree. Let them sail their cute little boat.
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Medic wrote:
>
> I think it will be much ado about nothing. Iran may want to beat it's chest
> a bit but they aren't going to do anything that's going to get
> them annihilated. They may be crazy, but they aren't tha
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Medic wrote:
> I think it will be much ado about nothing. Iran may want to beat it's chest
> a bit but they aren't going to do anything that's going to get
> them annihilated. They may be crazy, but they aren't that crazy.
The rules of engagement at sea at pre
#ithinktheyareTHATcrazy
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Medic wrote:
>
> I think it will be much ado about nothing. Iran may want to beat it's chest
> a bit but they aren't going to do anything that's going to get
> them annihilated. They may be crazy, but they aren't that crazy.
>
> On Wed, S
I think it will be much ado about nothing. Iran may want to beat it's chest
a bit but they aren't going to do anything that's going to get
them annihilated. They may be crazy, but they aren't that crazy.
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> There is no way this ends well.
>
There is no way this ends well.
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> Saw this on Twitter.
>
> http://www.cnn.com/2011/09/27/world/meast/iran-navy/index.html
>
> ...and is the third sailor from the right cupping the other dude's butt?
> Isn't that blasphemy in Iran?
>
>
that is definitely some cuppage.
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> Saw this on Twitter.
>
> http://www.cnn.com/2011/09/27/world/meast/iran-navy/index.html
>
> ...and is the third sailor from the right cupping the other dude's butt?
> Isn't that blasphemy in Iran?
>
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
