I have never had that problem. Even with 95-98. It will always let me upgrade.
I installed the Full version of XP Pro over top of my Win2K pro with no
problems.
At 11:04 AM 12/31/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>Question - in the past, Microsoft has had this _asinine_ policy where if
>you spent _more_
Sorry -- I meant "I think it does."
-V
-Original Message-
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:19 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: M$ Upgrade/Full
>
> I don't think it does -- I had a full version XP Pro disk and
>
> I don't think it does -- I had a full version XP Pro disk and was able
> to choose options for upgrading and fresh installs when I started the
> setup executable.
>
> This was upgrading from Win2000.
Sounds like a double negative here - you say "I don't think it does" but
you say you had op
onday, December 31, 2001 11:13 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: M$ Upgrade/Full
Actually, I wasn't asking about the quality of the upgrade (although
it's good to know), what I really want to know is if a Full version lets
you do an upgrade. Like I said, in the past, you couldn'
---
> From: fluffy bananachunks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:59 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: M$ Upgrade/Full
>
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Monday 31 December 2001 11:04, rcamden wrote:
> : Quest
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 31 December 2001 11:04, rcamden wrote:
: Question - in the past, Microsoft has had this _asinine_ policy where if
: you spent _more_ for the Full version of an OS instead of just the
: upgrade, you couldn't use the full version to upgrade an
