*CHING!*
2008/11/18 Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hehe ba dum dum
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f
Archi
Hehe ba dum dum
> -Original Message-
> From: Maureen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 7:45 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: More Obama gun nonsense
>
> They repealed prohibition. You can't ban gin.
>
>
>
> On
They repealed prohibition. You can't ban gin.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Illinois gin ban is ok?
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
There's a mig at the Marathon, Florida airport you can ride in.
You have to buy a share in the plane, it's like $300 for a 2 minute ride IIRC
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some of the things I've seen for sale surplus would blow your mind, jets are
> popular
sday, November 18, 2008 4:45 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: More Obama gun nonsense
>
> I worked for a US museum company that was offered a free
> Russian sub. If we came and picked it up.
>
> (and it was almost fully armed. They didn't want to spend the
>
You have to treat each round as an individual weapon.
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Churvis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 4:50 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: RE: More Obama gun nonsense
>
> I forget if there are any "h
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: More Obama gun nonsense
>
> You are f***king kidding me right?
>
> You are saying that it is *Possible* for a citizen to own an
> ARMED TANK in the US??
>
> 2008/11/18 Adam Churvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Actually, Tim, the
Sounds good.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Adam Churvis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you, Sam! :)
>
> PS-- if you're ever in Atlanta, give me a call and we'll go plink some (or
> p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-plink, if you're interested).
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Adam Phillip Churvis
> Pre
p-p-p-plink, if you're interested).
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Adam Phillip Churvis
> President
> Productivity Enhancement
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 3:57 PM
> > To: cf
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 3:57 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: More Obama gun nonsense
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:21 PM, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Our guns don't protect us from the government...they haven't
t; -Original Message-
> From: Vivec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 4:29 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: More Obama gun nonsense
>
> You are f***king kidding me right?
>
> You are saying that it is *Possible* for a citizen to own an ARME
I worked for a US museum company that was offered a free Russian sub. If we
came and picked it up.
(and it was almost fully armed. They didn't want to spend the money to
remove them.)
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 4:28 PM, Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You are f***king kidding me right?
>
> You a
You are f***king kidding me right?
You are saying that it is *Possible* for a citizen to own an ARMED
TANK in the US??
2008/11/18 Adam Churvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Actually, Tim, the bazooka would be a Destructive Device, which is, IIRC, a
> $1,000 transfer tax. The tank itself doesn't require
u a lot of money and effort
to acquire.
Respectfully,
Adam Phillip Churvis
President
Productivity Enhancement
> -Original Message-
> From: Loathe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 2:31 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: RE: More Obama gun nonsense
&
The continental United States hasn't been invaded since the war of 1812, I'm
pretty damned glad we have an Army.
> -Original Message-
> From: G Money [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 3:21 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: More Ob
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:21 PM, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Our guns don't protect us from the government...they haven't for over a
> century.
And the day we need them we won't have them.
> They protect our lives and our property. From what, you ask? From
> other people with guns. Yipp
> tBone wrote:
> Yeah you know how that pesky constitution doesn't really mean much anymore.
>
I've heard some really smart people argue the 2nd and I've never heard
anyone come to any solid conclusion.
Wiki has a great writeup from an originalism perspective and takes it
all the way back to the
pesky constitution doesn't really mean much anymore.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 3:00 PM
> > To: cf-community
> > Subject: Re: More Obama gun nonsense
> >
> > >
Yeah you know how that pesky constitution doesn't really mean much anymore.
> -Original Message-
> From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 3:00 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: More Obama gun nonsense
>
> > gMoney
> gMoney wrote:
> BZZT! Wrong. it's VERY clear. If a local government removes it's citizens
> right to bear arms, it would be violating the constitution of the united
> states. A four year old could figure that out.
>
Quick! Someone fetch a 4 year old!
(A little Marx Bros there for ya)
I don't
You don't think the amendment is valid any longer?
> -Original Message-
> From: G Money [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 2:47 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: More Obama gun nonsense
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Gruss
bit states from
legislating on guns even in your argument?
> -Original Message-
> From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 2:42 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: More Obama gun nonsense
>
> > tBone wrote:
> > I still don&#x
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thus given there's nothing clear but something there, let's leave it
> up to local governments
>
BZZT! Wrong. it's VERY clear. If a local government removes it's citizens
right to bear arms, it would be violating the constit
> tBone wrote:
> Now how much those arms cost, and whether you can afford to shoot
> them..
>
I mo see if'n Miz Palin wants ta go 'bou huntin' with ma A10 Warthog.
She cuts up dem 'bou good. Real good.
~|
Adobe® Cold
> tBone wrote:
> I still don't see how you feel it isn't an individual right
Because here's the text:
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free
State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be
infringed
There are numerous terms not well defined here:
* "
shoot
them..
I have a friend whose 300 win mag is costing him $3.00 a shot right now.
> -Original Message-
> From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 2:22 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: More Obama gun nonsense
>
> &
> Adam wrote:
>> You can't own bazookas.
>
> Yes you can.
>
Really? What are the limits and/or requirements for me to get and use
a bazooka and what else can I get?
Fully auto M60? Combat shotgun? Blackhawk Helicopter? Oo! AC-130?
Can I order online? Oh, and a warthog. Gotta love the classi
The Illinois gin ban is ok?
The DC gun ban?
> -Original Message-
> From: G Money [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 8:55 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: More Obama gun nonsense
>
> I kept looking through all that, waiting to find
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 12:36 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: More Obama gun nonsense
>
> > gMoney wrote:
> > I kept looking through all that, waiting to find this "nonsense" of
> > which you speak
y [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 8:55 AM
> > To: cf-community
> > Subject: Re: More Obama gun nonsense
> >
> > I kept looking through all that, waiting to find this
> > "nonsense" of which you speak...but all I kept find
mmunity
> Subject: Re: More Obama gun nonsense
>
> I kept looking through all that, waiting to find this
> "nonsense" of which you speak...but all I kept finding was "sense".
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> You can't own bazookas.
Yes you can.
> You can't legally buy a tank.
Yes you can.
> So we already "constrain" the right (assuming you think believe the
> Constitution confers an individual right which I don't)
That is correct.
> Therefore it seems like the discussion comes down to:
>
> 1
> gMoney wrote:
> I kept looking through all that, waiting to find this "nonsense" of which
> you speak...but all I kept finding was "sense".
>
I was thinking the same thing.
And I'm never sure where these gun discussions go because they lack a
foundation in logic.
We already ban guns. You can'
I kept looking through all that, waiting to find this "nonsense" of which
you speak...but all I kept finding was "sense".
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, so heres his opinions, quoted from him directly, checked by
> factcheck.org
>
>
--
Divine creation he
34 matches
Mail list logo
