On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> This brou-ha-ha-ha has a tie to one of your favorite Vast Democratic
> Conspiracy (VDC) agents.
>
> The WSJ piece was a great piece of fiction, but the moron spent so
> much time making up facts he forgot to state the actual ones.
You haven't
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
> No they rejected it, but I won't argue facts since they don't matter for you.
The justices said the campaign's claim of double-counted ballots is
better resolved in a court hearing where evidence can be presented,
instead of by canvassing boards
> Sam wrote:
> The Culture of Corruption party?
> Do I really need to draw you a picture :P
>
Oh, Sammy, you've missed it on this one!
This brou-ha-ha-ha has a tie to one of your favorite Vast Democratic
Conspiracy (VDC) agents.
The WSJ piece was a great piece of fiction, but the moron spent so
> Sam wrote:
> No, they told him it's a lower courts issue.
>
No they rejected it, but I won't argue facts since they don't matter for you.
You should take on Nate Silver though, as I'm sure he'd be amused.
Here's his original post:
http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/01/did-wall-street-jorunal-
The Culture of Corruption party?
Do I really need to draw you a picture :P
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
> In other news, I'm disappointed that Sam hasn't yet posted the
> connection to the vast Democratic conspiracy ... but there's still
> time ...
>
~~
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
> Actually, Coleman is having far more trouble with the Minnesota
> Supreme Court, which generally has a conservative reputation, than he
No, they told him it's a lower courts issue.
> And the Coleman campaign evidently hasn't either, or it
> pre
> RoMunn wrote:
> It might take a LONG time to get to a ruling, and under Minnesota law,
> Franken can't take the seat until then. That's half of the battle at this
> point.
>
Well, it's just a guess, but I think the panel has decided (Coleman
loses) and the only question is how long to wait to an
pot, meet kettle.
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
> > Michael wrote:
> > I want to start ending every single email, voice message or text message
> > with this.
> >
>
> You need to understand that despite his obvious talent for objective
> analysis Robert has spent only about 1
It might take a LONG time to get to a ruling, and under Minnesota law,
Franken can't take the seat until then. That's half of the battle at this
point.
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Gruss wrote:
>
> Basically Coleman is saying: "Hey judges! Your recount sucks ass and
> you're morons. Now do i
> RoMunn wrote:
> Coleman just sued *today* to contest the recount results.
>
Oh. One other note. From your link:
--
The lawsuit alleges that the Canvassing Board made mistakes when
determining voter intent on challenged ballots, that ineligible voters
cast ballots and that some absentee ballot
> RoMunn wrote:
> Coleman just sued *today* to contest the recount results.
>
::sigh::
For, like, the 4th time. And the entire analysis of why he's suing is
contained above but, because I like you, I'll summarize it here:
--
Coleman's problem, however, is not so much that his argument is
legally
Coleman just sued *today* to contest the recount results.
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20090107/D95HVC700.html
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Gruss wrote:
> > RoMunn wrote:
> > All true and totally irrelevant. The questionable decisions and practices
> > were made by poll workers in Democr
> RoMunn wrote:
> All true and totally irrelevant. The questionable decisions and practices
> were made by poll workers in Democratic precincts and ruled on by a
> Democrat.
Oops - forgot to mention that Coleman did take his evidence of these
"questionable decisions and practices" to the MN State
> Michael wrote:
> I want to start ending every single email, voice message or text message
> with this.
>
You need to understand that despite his obvious talent for objective
analysis Robert has spent only about 10 minutes of the last decade
being objective.
~
> Sam wrote:
> Have you read this?
Have you read this:
Did the Wall Street Journal Fire their Fact-Checkers?
The Wall Street Journal is bar none one of the best newspapers in the
country -- except when its Editorial Board is having a bad day. And
today the Board is having a very bad day, having
> GG wrote:
> In the meantime I'll continue to bombard you with pesky facts.
>
The Good News for Coleman...
is that the Minnesota Supreme Court's order (.pdf) today didn't
make any judgment whatsoever about the merits of Coleman's case on
absentee ballots. It merely said that the time to reso
> RoMunn wrote:
> All true and totally irrelevant. The questionable decisions and practices
> were made by poll workers in Democratic precincts and ruled on by a
> Democrat.
Have you contacted the Coleman campaign with your evidence?
Because they disagree with you.
As does the MN Secretary of St
> So stick your "it's all Republicans running this thing" in your pie hole
and choke on it.
I want to start ending every single email, voice message or text message
with this.
"Hi Chris, it's Michael. I'm going to need to move our meeting to next week
as I'll be out of town. I'll get Lisa to pre
All true and totally irrelevant. The questionable decisions and practices
were made by poll workers in Democratic precincts and ruled on by a
Democrat. So stick your "it's all Republicans running this thing" in your
pie hole and choke on it.
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Gruss wrote:
> >
>
> Fa
> GG wrote:
> In my next episode I'll explain why that's moronic and will likely
> result in nothing
This afternoon, Minnesota's Supreme Court will take up Norm Coleman's
request (PDF) to stop the counting of so-called "fifth-pile" absentee
ballots in Minnesota. These are ballots that initially we
> RoMunn wrote:
> Now you're just being a bad sport Sam, we're supposed to sit meekly by and
> say nothing while Democrats rig the vote count. Didn't you get the memo? ;-)
>
I did read that and it was a GREAT piece of comedy based on fiction.
Facts:
* The recount was triggered by MN State Law
*
See, and the funny part about that statement is several times before the
election when it was brought up the bama was spending a small fortunre on
his election night party, some dems on this list said "well, they did it
too"
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:59 PM, CFTodd wrote:
> *shrug* just becaus
I heard that was biased so I'll get back in line.
Franken won fair and square!
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
> Now you're just being a bad sport Sam, we're supposed to sit meekly by and
> say nothing while Democrats rig the vote count. Didn't you get the memo? ;-)
>
~
Now you're just being a bad sport Sam, we're supposed to sit meekly by and
say nothing while Democrats rig the vote count. Didn't you get the memo? ;-)
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Sam wrote:
> Have you read this?
> Funny Business in Minnesota
> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1231119676425
I don't support one over the other, but that report certainly seemed unbiased
to me.
0_0
> Have you read this?
> Funny Business in Minnesota
> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123111967642552909.html
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 s
Have you read this?
Funny Business in Minnesota
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123111967642552909.html
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>> Bruce wrote:
>> Yeah, only us mean ole Republicans steal seats and offices. We know someone
>> of the likes of that useless POS Al Franken
They're all involved.
Enjoy, the next four years will be the biggest culture of corruption ever.
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Rastafari wrote:
> oh i knew blago was involved and all that, but i didnt realize
> that this guy was actually part of that problem, i guess i thought
> they wouldnt b
, is one word that brings peace.
-- siddhartha gautama
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Bruce Sorge wrote:
> Which just goes to show. Stick with what you know.
> - Original Message -
> From: "Michael Grant"
> To: "cf-community"
> Sent: Tuesday, Jan
Which just goes to show. Stick with what you know.
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Grant"
To: "cf-community"
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 9:59 PM
Subject: Re: poll - Will Burris be seated as a US Senator?
>> that useless POS Al Franken
>
> I th
> Bruce wrote:
> Yeah, only us mean ole Republicans steal seats and offices. We know someone
> of the likes of that useless POS Al Franken
Whether he'd dream of it or not wouldn't matter - he can't - it's in
the hands of Republicans.
The recount, triggered by MN State law, is being run by a Repub
Seems like Reid thinks since they're black they can't win in the next election
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Rastafari wrote:
> i dont get why they are or want to block this guy?
>
> what gives?
>
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 soft
*shrug* just because the dems did it them doesn't negate the possibility
that the repubs are wanting to do it now. That, "well, they did it
too!" deflective defense is both interesting and annoying. It doesn't
make it any more "right" on either side.
And, yup, that's the way it goes =-/
Bruc
As for Al Franken, only a complete tool like Norm Coleman could possibly
lose an incumbent seat in a Rep leaning state to a complete tool like Al
Franken.
LOL.
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Bruce Sorge wrote:
> Yeah, only us mean ole Republicans steal seats and offices. We know someone
> of
. Oh well. That's the way it goes I
> guess.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jerry Johnson"
> To: "cf-community"
> Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 9:40 PM
> Subject: Re: poll - Will Burris be seated as a US Senator?
>
>
> > Be
> that useless POS Al Franken
I thought he was pretty funny in the 80's SNL's.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;2944
ather
unimportant details when casting stones. Oh well. That's the way it goes I
guess.
- Original Message -
From: "Jerry Johnson"
To: "cf-community"
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 9:40 PM
Subject: Re: poll - Will Burris be seated as a US Senator?
> Beca
> cHat wrote:
> Two words: Rod Blagojevich
>
> It's effectively guilt by association, Blagojevich has been accused of
> trying to sell the senate seat.
>
Yup.
I hate the guilt by association, the guilty until proven innocent
culture, and the he-worked-for/with-him-so-he/she-sucks concepts.
But .
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:40 PM, C. Hatton Humphrey wrote:
> It's effectively guilt by association, Blagojevich has been accused of
> trying to sell the senate seat.
I don't think it's just by association. If he's been trying to sell the
seat, then it's a pretty short put to think that the perso
> they think it's plaxico burress and that he's packin' heat.
Then isn't he really only a danger to himself?
:-P
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
~
> i dont get why they are or want to block this guy?
>
> what gives?
Two words: Rod Blagojevich
It's effectively guilt by association, Blagojevich has been accused of
trying to sell the senate seat.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 softw
Because he was appointed by a crooked creep who tainted the appointment
process (and therefore his appointments are suspect of that corruption)
I don't think he will get seated. It is too good a grandstand for the rest
of the senators to say "we hate corruption, look at us". And for the repubs,
it
ah that makes sense.
thanks chow lee
Better than a thousand hollow words, is one word that brings peace.
-- siddhartha gautama
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Charlie Griefer
wrote:
> they think it's plaxico burress and that he's packin' heat.
>
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Rastafar
they think it's plaxico burress and that he's packin' heat.
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Rastafari wrote:
> i dont get why they are or want to block this guy?
>
> what gives?
>
> tw
>
> Better than a thousand hollow words, is one word that brings peace.
> -- siddhartha gautama
>
>
>
> On Tue
i dont get why they are or want to block this guy?
what gives?
tw
Better than a thousand hollow words, is one word that brings peace.
-- siddhartha gautama
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
> Curious what everyone thinks. Reid denied him access to the Senate today.
> Burris
> RoMunn wrote:
> Curious what everyone thinks.
Excellent summary!
Hmmm ... I think to avoid the battle your analysis suggests, they'll
cut a deal wherein he agrees to only serve out his term and not run.
The problem with my theory is that Burris seems to think he's been
annointed by God to serv
As for Obama being honest etc., it would appear that aside from his plagerism
he's also been caught prevaricating. http://tinyurl.com/269lxh (Article to
follow). But saying in public one thing and the exact opposite in private is
not what I would term honest. Then a senior aide claiming that his
08 2:36 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Poll: Repubs Like Obama, McCain
I'd like to compare him to Kennedy more.
While a short administration, one that brought the special operations
community to the forefront and was strongly anti-communist.
Larry Lyons wrote:
> I still feel very iffy a
I'd like to compare him to Kennedy more.
While a short administration, one that brought the special operations
community to the forefront and was strongly anti-communist.
Larry Lyons wrote:
> I still feel very iffy about him. The last president with so little
> experience was the Shrub, and loo
I still feel very iffy about him. The last president with so little experience
was the Shrub, and look where it got us.
>I don't think there is any real mystery here. He's a decent, honorable guy
>in a dirty profession and people like that. I'd say I like him almost as
>much as I like McCain. I'm
I don't think there is any real mystery here. He's a decent, honorable guy
in a dirty profession and people like that. I'd say I like him almost as
much as I like McCain. I'm still voting for McCain, though.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Gruss G wrote:
> Republicans like Sen. Barack Obama near
"there was a control group of monkeys that weren't stabbed, only punched ..."
oh, man, too funny.
On 10/17/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RTFLMAO!! This one is awesome:
>
> Repeatedly stabbing monkeys with sharpened objects may have an adverse
> effect on their health, according to
BTW - do NOT miss the videos below the one I posted, but they are
definitely NSFW; especially the #1 video.
~|
Check out the new features and enhancements in the
latest product release - download the "What's New PDF" now
http://do
RTFLMAO!! This one is awesome:
Repeatedly stabbing monkeys with sharpened objects may have an adverse
effect on their health, according to a new study.
http://www.theonion.com/content/video/study_multiple_stab_wounds_may_be
~|
Dreamweaver if I get handed a table based design, all nested and
whatnot, no doubt. Sometimes fire it up for link checking and stuff,
but I've moved more to an "application" type mentality, using eclipse
(subclipse, cfeclipse, wtp, aptana), which doesn't really lend itself
to DW design any more.
> -Original Message-
> From: Heald, Timothy (NIH/CIT) [C] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 4:54 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: POLL: Web Site GUI Dev Tools
>
> Man, you already have aptana, why are you using Top Style?
>
> Open a
| Fax: 301.443.7010 | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 4:35 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: POLL: Web Site GUI Dev Tools
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From:
> -Original Message-
> From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 8:30 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: POLL: Web Site GUI Dev Tools
>
> For those of you that do web site design, what tools do you use? Do
> you use GUI tools like dreamweaver? How about tha
i used to be a flash fanboy 7 or so years ago.
have only with in the last week have opened it back up to a little animations..
i dont understand why some people prefer it over a little js or what not.
it can do some simply awesome stuff if you are into AS, but i still
hate the flaming logo use of
Only when forced kicking and screaming.
**wonders if anyone has noticed that the really top community networking
sites that are making waves in the news (flickr, twitter, squidoo,
fastpitch, basecamp, backpack, etc ) dont use a lot of flash if any.**
On 6/28/07, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Ihrig The Web wrote:
> FireWorks for image manipulation / slicing & basic font manipulation.
> then into DreamWeaver for a quick mock up.
>
Anyone use flash in their sites?
~|
CF 8 â Scorpio beta now available,
easily build
FireWorks for image manipulation / slicing & basic font manipulation.
then into DreamWeaver for a quick mock up.
need to invest in the new suite..
~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7
The most significant release in over 10 years.
photoshop for layout
photoshop for cutting layout
homesite + for cf/html/css/javascript etc
wsftp to send er up
:) tw
On 6/28/07, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use CF Studio. Yeah yeah yeah, CFEclipse, blah blah blah - - someday when
> I have a day to spare to learn the new tools
+1 as well as use HomeSite+
As you said, one day I will jump up to CFEclipse.
To me DW requires more resources than CFStudio or Homesite
-Original Message-
From: Erika L. Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 8:42 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: POLL: Web
I use CF Studio. Yeah yeah yeah, CFEclipse, blah blah blah - - someday when
I have a day to spare to learn the new tools.
I like to hand code everything, and I can do it very quickly - so I like my
old CFStudio for the moment. It's basics are good enough for me. The only
wizard I use are if I make
> Chances are they flagged her because of the one way ticket. That's thought to
> be an
> indicator of a potential terrorist
heh... given that so far all the terrorists we know to have been
_actual_ terrorists flew on round-trip first class tickets?
Department of Homeland Scare-Tactics...
--
w
>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/10/31/congresswoman.nofly.ap/index.html
> Critical congresswoman lands on no-fly list
>
>SANTA ANA, California (AP) -- A California congresswoman said she was
>briefly denied access to a United Airlines flight last week because
>her name appeared on a "no-fly list"
That's why I let it go without comment.
On 10/31/06, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> man, that is so wrong.
>
> On 10/31/06, Gruss wrote:
> >
> > > JJ wrote:
> > > My father is on the list because his name is Richard Johnson.
> >
> > Dick Johnson?? What's his first name, Harold?
~~~
man, that is so wrong.
On 10/31/06, Gruss wrote:
>
> > JJ wrote:
> > My father is on the list because his name is Richard Johnson.
>
> Dick Johnson?? What's his first name, Harold?
>
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterl
> JJ wrote:
> My father is on the list because his name is Richard Johnson.
Dick Johnson?? What's his first name, Harold?
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion info
The no-fly list is pretty lame, really. Bare minimum matching of names to
try to identify someone dangerous, when in fact if the person really is
dangerous, they just might understand the risks and be travelling under a
fake name.
On 10/31/06, Jerry wrote:
>
> http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/10/3
More fuel.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-fly_list#False_positives_and_alleged_misuses
My father is on the list because his name is Richard Johnson. He can't
preprint boarding passes, and it took over 4 hours to pass back into
the US from Canada, even though he is a retired Navy.
On 10/31/06, Da
put me down as undecided. I'd like to think it was, but suspect it was not. At
a minimum though it highlights a problem of the list. Sanchez is an incredibly
common name and I'm willing to bet that there are hundreds of women named
Loretta Sanchez in this country. And there is no mechanism for p
check it out, he is now below Nixon in his second term
On 11/17/05, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Bush's Approval Rating Falls Again, Poll Shows
> THE WALL STREET JOURNAL ONLINE
> November 17, 2005
>
> President Bush's positive job rating continues to fall, touching
> another new l
it's more than that... I mentioned before subcribing to some very
rightwing and some very left wing lists. They may as well be talking
about different countries. How is there supposed to be any sort of
rational dialog is anyone with an opposing view is instantly
demonized?
It seems like you can fi
> Dana wrote:
> we all know that you prefer Rush Limbaugh telling you what to think.
> Seriously, I do think the balkanization of media coverage into
> separate territories based on ideology is part of the problem here.
>
That is THE problem. The concept of the media, or parts of the media,
as t
we all know that you prefer Rush Limbaugh telling you what to think.
Seriously, I do think the balkanization of media coverage into
separate territories based on ideology is part of the problem here.
Dana
On 7/14/05, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So Clintons negative press coverage was lower b
I think I've ask this before but it bears repeating.
Is it natural talent or did you have to work very hard to be such an
ass. Inquiring minds want to know.
On 7/14/05, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you have ADD?
>
> On 7/14/05, Gruss Gott wrote:
> >
> > Either way, it's a moot point becau
Do you have ADD?
On 7/14/05, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Either way, it's a moot point because even if you were right, it's not
> the media's responsibility to make sure everyone likes the President.
> In fact I'm not even sure why we're debating such a irrelevant thing.
>
>
~
> Larry wrote:
> I thought that was the job of Fox News.
>
It's just distrubing to the core that people think the answer to a
media that doesn't ask enough questions is to add more networks that
ask less.
To be an American citizen and want the press to be the publicity arm
of the federal gov't
I thought that was the job of Fox News.
larry
On 7/14/05, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Either way, it's a moot point because even if you were right, it's not
> the media's responsibility to make sure everyone likes the President.
> In fact I'm not even sure why we're debating such a i
> Sam wrote:
> YOU SAID "Americans Losing Faith In Bush"
> I'm telling you why.
>
I didn't say that, a poll did, and you're not telling my why, you're
telling me your theory which I've shown you is flawed.
(Maybe the President's poor rating has something to do with record
gov't spending, a top
YOU SAID "Americans Losing Faith In Bush"
I'm telling you why.
On 7/14/05, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> 1.) Correlation does not equal causation.
>
> 2.) What is your point? That the media should be responsible for
> government popularity? Or that they shouldn't be?
Isn't that the Mission statement for Fox News -
"The media should be responsible for government popularity? "
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 12:51 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Poll: Americans Losing Faith
> Sam wrote:
> The more negative the reporting the lower the approval ratings.
> It's not rocket science. :)
>
1.) Correlation does not equal causation.
2.) What is your point? That the media should be responsible for
government popularity? Or that they shouldn't be?
~
You funny.
OK, I'll go slowly this time.
The more negative the reporting the lower the approval ratings.
It's not rocket science. :)
Also, this goes against your claims:
The three networks also seem to be boycotting Mr. Bush this time
around. He rated 619 stories during the study pe
> Sam wrote:
> So Clintons negative press coverage was lower because he was a better
> President? Who decides that?
If you think the press wasn't hard enough on the gov't then that's a
valid complaint. If you think the press should be an agent of the
federal gov't then you're a communist or fasc
> Sam wrote:
> Dude, your poll shows the Presidents numbers are down and that seems
> to be directly related to how the media presents him.
I'll make it easier for you:
1.) The President can present himself in any way that he likes. He
has many means to do that.
2.) A Whitehouse report's job
So Clintons negative press coverage was lower because he was a better
President? Who decides that?
I don't want people like Dan Rather telling me what to think.
On 7/14/05, Gruss Gott wrote:
> The federal gov't does a fine job of getting it's message out without
> the press. There's the Whitehou
> Brian wrote:
> I want my media to report what the federal government is saying and
> doing, then let ME criticize it.
The federal gov't does a fine job of getting it's message out without
the press. There's the Whitehouse spokesman, televised speeches, news
releases, weekly radio addresses, CSP
Dude, your poll shows the Presidents numbers are down and that seems
to be directly related to how the media presents him. To believe your
poll means anything is what's really scary. Man, you try to turn
everything around don't you?
On 7/14/05, Gruss Gott wrote:
> The press is NOT the publicity
C-Span?
--- On Thursday, July 14, 2005 2:30 PM, G scribed: ---
>
> I don't. I want my media to report what the federal government is
> saying and
> doing, then let ME criticize it. I don't want Dan Rather telling me
> why
> something the government did sucks.i just want him to tell me
> what
>
> The press is NOT the publicity agent of the Whitehouse. Why would you
> think it is?
>
> The reason for freedom of the press is to question the federal gov't.
> If the President feels he's not getting a fair shake in the "media"
> then he's got oodles of resources to combat that. The press ex
> Sam wrote:
> It could be all that negative reporting. Good thing Bush doesn't lead
> by polls like Clinton did :)
> President Bush just can't win with the broadcast networks.
The press is NOT the publicity agent of the Whitehouse. Why would you
think it is?
The reason for freedom of the pres
It could be all that negative reporting. Good thing Bush doesn't lead
by polls like Clinton did :)
http://insider.washingtontimes.com/articles/normal.php?StoryID=20050710-110047-2712r
http://www.cmpa.com/documents/05.07.11.100.Days.pdf
President Bush just can't win with the broadcast networks.
Harkins, Patrick wrote:
> I guess Won is recovering now from his heart condition caused by too much
> contemplating of Carolyn Murphy's assets! :)
>
Yes. Her beauty smitten me. Actually, I just had a lot of work and a
new and unopened iPod that has been sitting on my desk for the last 3
or
I guess Won is recovering now from his heart condition caused by too much
contemplating of Carolyn Murphy's assets! :)
>-Original Message-
>From: Won Lee
>
>Polls close tomorrow morning around 8 AM EST. Good luck.
Outbound email scanned for viruses. (e232)
~~
when do they open, 7:59?
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 16:27:13 -0500, Won Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Polls close tomorrow morning around 8 AM EST. Good luck.
>
> --
> 2004 - The year $184M couldn't buy a pennant.
>
>
~|
Specia
Polls close tomorrow morning around 8 AM EST. Good luck.
--
2004 - The year $184M couldn't buy a pennant.
~|
Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net
http://www.cfhosting.net
Message: http://www.
that is one scary thought. I don't even want to consider the vague
possibility of going there.
[shudder]
I may need to do a thorough scrubbing of my mind to get rid of that one.
larry
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 15:34:31 -0500, Won Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthew Small wrote:
> > Winner: Geo
oHorse =
createObject("component","com.animal.hoarse").Init("Dead","Poll: Carolyn
Murphy");
oHorse.Beat();
:)
btw, I vote yes.
Won Lee wrote:
>This just in. Carolyn Murphy rumored to be expert CF developer.
>Surely, a "yes" vote for our coding sister is in order.
>
>W
>
>
>
1 - 100 of 278 matches
Mail list logo
