not buying it Jerrycommunists are pretty much the antithesis
On Oct 6, 2010, at 6:23 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "that's the problem with liberal types...they think and act too
> independently to strap on armbands raise arms against fictional enemies."
>
> There would be six millions Jews
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:23 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "that's the problem with liberal types...they think and act too
> independently to strap on armbands raise arms against fictional enemies."
>
> There would be six millions Jews in Europe who would disagree with you on
> this if they weren't m
"that's the problem with liberal types...they think and act too
independently to strap on armbands raise arms against fictional enemies."
There would be six millions Jews in Europe who would disagree with you on
this if they weren't marched off to death camps.
J
-
There is more that binds us t
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> I'm convinced you think I'm as crazy as I know you to be.
I don't think you're crazy at all. You're mad sane, yo.
Mad meaning lots of sanity, not crazy. Crazy as in crazy insane, not
crazy as in mad (the way I used it in the first sentence.).
I n
I'm convinced you think I'm as crazy as I know you to be.
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 5:44 PM, denstar wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Sam wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 2:45 AM, denstar wrote:
>>>
>>> Not as pissed as I was when Bush blew through our savings (first time
>>> we'd be
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 2:45 AM, denstar wrote:
>>
>> Not as pissed as I was when Bush blew through our savings (first time
>> we'd been in the green in my lifetime, as I recall-- I think my folks
>> handed me debt, the bastards!).
>
> It's a shame Bu
I guess you didn't notice the Obama concerts before his election. And
all the fainting :)
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox
wrote:
>
> that's the problem with liberal types...they think and act too independently
> to strap on armbands raise arms against fictional enemies.
>
~~
that's the problem with liberal types...they think and act too independently to
strap on armbands raise arms against fictional enemies.
On Oct 4, 2010, at 9:18 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> I saw this link about the One Nation rally. I thought it was pretty
> humorous.
>
> http://www.thebl
No, you're talking gibberish and trying to backtrack.
Nice try.
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 8:24 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> I'm just saying that you're full of fetid manure.
>
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Sam wrote:
>>
>> You don't get it do you. Medic was implying Canada was socialist an
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 2:45 AM, denstar wrote:
>
> Not as pissed as I was when Bush blew through our savings (first time
> we'd been in the green in my lifetime, as I recall-- I think my folks
> handed me debt, the bastards!).
It's a shame Bush had to waste all your money after 9/11, shame on hi
> http://www.theblaze.com/stories/c-span-uses-828-crowd-shot-for-one-nation-promo/
I like this representation better - it's an animated GIF that cycles
two comparable images from atop the Washington monument, looking at
the Lincoln memorial on the two "main event" days.
Quite the distinction.
H
I'm just saying that you're full of fetid manure.
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> You don't get it do you. Medic was implying Canada was socialist and
> you boasted how successful they were right along with him.
>
> I was trying to explain to you they weren't.
> So if you're clai
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 8:13 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
...
> Democrats are pushing the bill for our great society projects to our
> children. And the bill for Medicare. And the bill for the stimulus.
> How do you feel about that
Not as pissed as I was when Bush blew through our savings (first time
we
You don't get it do you. Medic was implying Canada was socialist and
you boasted how successful they were right along with him.
I was trying to explain to you they weren't.
So if you're claim is they are not socialist what was your point of
mentioning that they aren't broke? Are you flaunting cap
I would much rather have a socialist nation than a fascist one...go ahead
and vote republican if you prefer the fascist nation.
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Sam wrote:
> >
> >
> > Thus, a candidate like Obama can succeed only by pushing
I saw this link about the One Nation rally. I thought it was pretty
humorous.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/c-span-uses-828-crowd-shot-for-one-nation-promo/
J
-
The danger is not that a particular class is unfit to govern. Every class is
unfit to govern. - Lord Acton
~
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox
wrote:
>
> So vote republican so they won't raise your taxes, but then again they won't
> curtail spending on their pet projects or wars either. Who cares if we kick
> the taxes on down to our children. The important thing is that we kept all
So vote republican so they won't raise your taxes, but then again they won't
curtail spending on their pet projects or wars either. Who cares if we kick the
taxes on down to our children. The important thing is that we kept all of our
money.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 4, 2010, at 4:23 PM, R
Here's another interesting link for you Sam from your heroes at the
Cato institute, you know the one the bastion of right wing group think
and Libertarianism:
http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=10208
So as you were saying?
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> So you admit you
BTW here is a link to a chart showing the most entrepreneurial
countries in the world in which Canada ranks THIRD after the U.S.
http://innovate.typepad.com/innovation/2007/05/most_entreprene.html
So if Canada is a socialist country, then I guess capitalism is really
socialism in wolf's clothing.
You still don't get it. Canada is not a socialist country, no matter
how hard your wish for it.
You're entitled to your own opinion Sam, just not your own facts.
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> So you admit you support socialism.
>
> Now you need to learn the difference between c
So you admit you support socialism.
Now you need to learn the difference between capitalism and socialism.
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> BTW what is the latest budget surplus for the Canadian government.
>
> Darned thrifty Canuck socialists anyhow. How dare they be
BTW what is the latest budget surplus for the Canadian government.
Darned thrifty Canuck socialists anyhow. How dare they be fiscally prudent.
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Medic wrote:
>
>>
>> > They will raise your taxes, take away your freedoms, and impoverish the
>> country. Go Dems!
>>
>
>
> > They will raise your taxes, take away your freedoms, and impoverish the
> country. Go Dems!
>
Pffft. Exactly! Just like that broke-ass Canada!
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldf
nuts.
Ok, now that that's out of my system...
-Original Message-
From: Robert Munn [mailto:cfmuns...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 4:48 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Progressives and Communists: Out of the Closet -- Together
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Judah
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>>> He's a socialist.
>>
>> That word does not mean what you think it means.
>
> I do not think it means what you think I think it
He thinks it means chatty.
Think beer summit.
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>>> He's a socialist.
>>
>> That word does not mean what you think it means.
>
> I
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>> He's a socialist.
>
> That word does not mean what you think it means.
I do not think it means what you think I think it means.
~~~
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
> He's a socialist.
That word does not mean what you think it means.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinow
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Sam wrote:
>
>
> Thus, a candidate like Obama can succeed only by pushing his agenda
> guardedly. He ran as a centrist, not as National Journal's certified
> "most liberal senator in 2007." It worked. As Rudd put it, Obama
> "didn't blow it."
He's a socialist. Som
Yeah, /they/ are the dupes.
Where's COINTELPRO when you need it?
:Den
--
In everything one thing is impossible: rationality.
Friedrich Nietzsche
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> I believe the word they used was dupes.
>
~
I believe the word they used was dupes.
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:08 PM, denstar wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 11:50 AM, C. Hatton Humphrey wrote:
>>
>>> typical right wing bs.
>>
>> What's that? That the Communists were an endorsing organization?
>> Sorry, Larry, but even a simpleton like
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 11:50 AM, C. Hatton Humphrey wrote:
>
>> typical right wing bs.
>
> What's that? That the Communists were an endorsing organization?
> Sorry, Larry, but even a simpleton like me can do the research to
> prove it true:
Sure, and a simpleton like myself can extrapolate from
> typical right wing bs.
What's that? That the Communists were an endorsing organization?
Sorry, Larry, but even a simpleton like me can do the research to
prove it true:
Go to http://action.onenationworkingtogether.org/organizations (the
link from http://action.onenationworkingtogether.org/con
typical right wing bs.
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/10/progressives_and_communists_ou_1.html
>
> A close look at the Saturday "One Nation" rally in Washington reveals
> something quite telling. It was a major gathering of the "progressive"
>
35 matches
Mail list logo
