AIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 9:07 AM
Subject: RE: Re:Madonna for Wes Clark
> Look, if you're not voting Clark this time around, do the sensible thing
> and be part of the loyal opposition.
>
> Write in '
Message-
From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 10:02 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Re:Madonna for Wes Clark
Yeah, I know. But still I think it might be wise to hedge my bets and
run a
monkey this time. Or at least a lemur.
-Kevin
[Todays Threads]
[This
L PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 5:06 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Re:Madonna for Wes Clark
>
>
> I hope you're right considering that the concensus right now is that
> none of
> the candidates can win against Bush.
>
> During the 2000 elections, I
Bill Clinton's chances of beating Sr. were put at about 4% going into
the _nominations_.
Things change rapidly in a presidential year.
M
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 5:06 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Re:Madonn
I hope you're right considering that the concensus right now is that none of
the candidates can win against Bush.
During the 2000 elections, I swore that my cat could have won against Bush,
but I was proven wrong.
-Kevin
- Original Message -
From: "Jerry Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
It's not just that - if the guy can drum up this kind of support now, it shows he's got the strongest PR campaign, which is all an election is in any case.
- Matt Small
- Original Message -
From: Ben Braver
To: CF-Community
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 3:57 PM
Subject: Re:
