Re: Ruby on Rails

2009-03-27 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
http://www.rubyplus.org/episodes Here's a decent set of screencasts. Keep in mind that you're learning both ruby and rails. Feel free to ask me any questions you might have. On Mar 26, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Scott Raley wrote: > > Any easy recommended online tutorial for ruby on rails. I just

Re: Ruby on Rails is slow...

2008-04-22 Thread Robert Munn
That's where it seems to be going. When I read that a bunch of the Ruby libraries were written in C, I immediately thought, "That's CF 5!". On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 6:15 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If they'd use jRuby, they'd get the advantage of using java and ruby > and cf! > > > On Apr 2

Re: Ruby on Rails is slow...

2008-04-22 Thread zaph0d . b33bl3br0x
If they'd use jRuby, they'd get the advantage of using java and ruby and cf! On Apr 22, 2008, at 2:32 AM, Dave l wrote: > i know hms was using a lot of ror in there back office stuff and > have supposedly thrown in the towel with ror and moving it to java > and a side benefit of that is th

Re: Ruby on Rails is slow...

2008-04-22 Thread zaph0d . b33bl3br0x
It's same argument that's been made forever with CF, do you want to spend more on manhours or hardware. Hardware usually is cheaper. Yes, rails is slow, but I'd venture to say it's fast enough and rails on jRuby and all it's brethren is even faster. On Apr 22, 2008, at 12:33 AM, Robert Munn

Re: Ruby on Rails is slow...

2008-04-22 Thread Dave l
i know hms was using a lot of ror in there back office stuff and have supposedly thrown in the towel with ror and moving it to java and a side benefit of that is that they can still use all their cfm code. >Funny article, the gist is that Ruby sucks for performance but is going to >take over th

RE: Ruby on Rails

2007-06-12 Thread Loathe
Hahaha Uh oh. /me ducks and runs. -Original Message- From: Rick Root [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 2:50 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: Ruby on Rails Sure there's a reason. Coldfusion is dying, isn't it? ;) On 6/12/07, Zaphod Beeblebrox <[EM

Re: Ruby on Rails

2007-06-12 Thread Rick Root
Sure there's a reason. Coldfusion is dying, isn't it? ;) On 6/12/07, Zaphod Beeblebrox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > you don't want to get me started! :) > > On 6/12/07, Dan Munez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Anybody messed with this yet? What are your opinions? I read up a little > > bit on

Re: Ruby on Rails

2007-06-12 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
you don't want to get me started! :) On 6/12/07, Dan Munez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anybody messed with this yet? What are your opinions? I read up a little > bit on it. ANy reason to switch to it at all? hehehe > > ~| D

Re: Ruby on Rails

2007-06-12 Thread Erika L. Walker
hehehe? On 6/12/07, Dan Munez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hehehe > > ~| Deploy Web Applications Quickly across the enterprise with ColdFusion MX7 & Flex 2 Free Trial http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=RVJ

RE: Ruby on Rails

2005-01-21 Thread Marlon Moyer
After I sent that, I did want to mention that PLUM, by the Churvi, offers a lot of that functionality too, maybe even more > -Original Message- > From: Jim Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 1:12 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re

Re: Ruby on Rails

2005-01-21 Thread Jim Campbell
- after reading OnLamp article - Wow, that's impressive. I think I'll have to explore this in a little more detail... - Jim Marlon Moyer wrote: >I'm always checking out different languages and although I've never >programmed in Ruby, it seems very tempting now: > > > >http://www.onlamp.com/p

Re: Ruby on Rails

2005-01-21 Thread Jim Campbell
I've been thinking about learning Ruby. My favorite language by far is Python - it's very easy, very useful and it's hard not to get addicted to the real-time interpreter, where you can play with interfaces and classes and functions without having to complile something beforehand - very nice.