Texas Rep Lamar Smith said he will try to resurrect this in the spring in
the House.
-Original Message-
From: Dana [mailto:dana.tier...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 4:04 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: SOPA protest: 7,000 and growing
SOPA is the House bill. Sen Leahy
My sites will all be black...
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 12:48 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: FW: SOPA protest: 7,000 and growing
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0112/71535.html
SOPA protest: 7,000 and gro
SOPA is the House bill. Sen Leahy is apparently still trying to get the
Senate bill passed. Ron Wyden has had a hold on it, but I don't know how
effective a tactic that is if the whole rest of the Senate wants to pass
the bill. Check out the campaign contributions; this is not at all dead in
the w
agreed. This is about trying to regulate the internet when you don't
freaking understand it. At all, apparently. The MPAA spokesman was totally
unconcerned that DNSSEC won't work if they pass the bill. It's a
badly-needed security protocol that's been in the works for like sixteen
years! Some of t
Nope. Quite a number *wanted* to testify, but the only company that got
scheduled was Google. And *that* was because they wanted to yell at them
about running ads for Canadian pharmacies.
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> Also according to what I have read, there was no
Also according to what I have read, there was no tech industry input,
only input from groups like the MPAA.
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Scott Stewart
wrote:
>
> This is the crux of the whole protest. It's not about supporting piracy,
> its about a badly written dangerous piece of legislatio
This is the crux of the whole protest. It's not about supporting piracy,
its about a badly written dangerous piece of legislation that would
effectively break internet security and in the long term cost thousands of
tech jobs.
There are two types of people that should never ever make IT decisions
I think that you can be against SOPA and still be for property and content
rights. The assumed goals of SOPA are mostly not as foul as the misguided
way they are trying to go about it.
-Cameron
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Jacob wrote:
> I thought Obama said yesterday that he will not sup
I can sympathize, but the proposed solutions are like using a nuke to
kill a fly. Why can't the tech industry come up with a viable
solution.
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Jacob wrote:
>
> I thought Obama said yesterday that he will not support SOPA?
>
> I am in between... I am for free inte
I thought Obama said yesterday that he will not support SOPA?
I am in between... I am for free internet, etc..., but I am sick of those
that pirate our content and make it available for download for free. Since
all of them are out of the country, we are screwed and lose revenue because
of it. T
10 matches
Mail list logo
