If your pinky was longer than you middle finger causing no gloves to
fit, a little off the top is a good thing. I just don't know why all
the gentiles joined in :P
.
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 9:41 AM, PT wrote:
>
> More like losing a digit or two. You can function just fine without
> your pinky
"+10 for leaving us alone. I despise having to deal with governments,
even after many years of working for and with them. Or perhaps because of
that."
Amen
"Apparently the liberal agenda for protecting children starts at birth :)
(throw some gasoline on the fire and watch it burn baby!)"
More like losing a digit or two. You can function just fine without
your pinky on either hand and probably won't even miss them, but people
generally don't have them removed at birth for no good reason. Tell the
hospital that you want you kid's little fingers removed and see how they
react.
To: cf-community
> > Subject: Re: Sign of the Apocalypse: Jews, Muslims sue to block
> referendum on circumcision
> >
> >
> > The backers of this law claim to want to protect the rights of the
> > child, which would fit with the liberal agenda. I suspect some
>
; -Original Message-
> From: Maureen [mailto:mamamaur...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 02:05 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Sign of the Apocalypse: Jews, Muslims sue to block referendum on
> circumcision
>
>
> The backers of this law claim to want to p
I bet you would have similar feelings if your labia or clitorus were cut
off...
-Original Message-
From: Maureen [mailto:mamamaur...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 02:05 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Sign of the Apocalypse: Jews, Muslims sue to block referendum
on
+10 for leaving us alone. I despise having to deal with
governments, even after many years of working for and with them. Or
perhaps because of that.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:02 PM, G Money wrote:
>
> Yeah, weird.
>
> Why can't those idiots get together and protect everyone, all the time?
>
Yeah, weird.
Why can't those idiots get together and protect everyone, all the time?
OR...better yet.just leave us all alone :)
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> And the conservative agenda stops at birth.
>
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:27 PM, G Money wrote:
> >
>
> > A
And the conservative agenda stops at birth.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:27 PM, G Money wrote:
>
> Apparently the liberal agenda for protecting children starts at birth :)
>
> (throw some gasoline on the fire and watch it burn baby!)
~~
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> The backers of this law claim to want to protect the rights of the
> child, which would fit with the liberal agenda.
Apparently the liberal agenda for protecting children starts at birth :)
(throw some gasoline on the fire and watch it burn
"Stupid waste of time and energy, because it will never pass."
Probably not. On the PC perspective, the situation gets a lot trickier when
you add in Muslims.
Just weird that someone would even try it.
Anyway, it's good to seem Muslims and Jews cooperating on something.
J
-
Ninety percent
The backers of this law claim to want to protect the rights of the
child, which would fit with the liberal agenda. I suspect some
weiner misses the tip of his weener, is mad at mommy and daddy because
of it, so he wants to foist his rage on the rest of the world.
Stupid waste of time and energy
12 matches
Mail list logo
