Libya may be better off, but who will be in charge of Libya? That can be
scary in itself!
-Original Message-
From: GMoney [mailto:gm0n3...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 7:55 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: So. Qaddafi is dead.
I found that the news barely even drew a
You mean the Kennedy Center is behind it?
/runs
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Nah, Qaddafi has been one of the propaganda machine's boogeymen since
> forever. I'd bet money on that revolution be funded from Foggy Bottom.
>
> I could see regime change in Cuba, yeah. Mexi
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Nah, Qaddafi has been one of the propaganda machine's boogeymen since
> forever.
Right, which means our propaganda machine sucks. 40+ years it took it to
finally yield results!
Or maybe.sometimes things happen without cause from the Uni
Nah, Qaddafi has been one of the propaganda machine's boogeymen since
forever. I'd bet money on that revolution be funded from Foggy Bottom.
I could see regime change in Cuba, yeah. Mexico, not so much.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Jerry Milo Johnson wrote:
>
> Oh, I wasn't thinking atta
Oh, I wasn't thinking attacking. I was thinking "regime change" and stirring
the local political pots.
We didn't get involved in Libya until well after the fires started.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Nah. Mexico and Cuba don't have enough propaganda value. Fidel is pre
Nah. Mexico and Cuba don't have enough propaganda value. Fidel is pretty
much out of the picture and Raul spits and sputters but doesn't draw much
attention. Attacking Mexico would bring too much attention to the US
mistakes in the drug war.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Jerry Milo Johnson
i would bet more money on Mexico and Cuba.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> This is very remindful of George R.R. Martin's Songs of Fire and Ice
> series,
> which I am reading currently. Nothing more than a Game of Thrones.
>
> The next propaganda target for the US will lik
This is very remindful of George R.R. Martin's Songs of Fire and Ice series,
which I am reading currently. Nothing more than a Game of Thrones.
The next propaganda target for the US will likely be either Iran or
Venezuela.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Ras Tafari wrote:
>
> meh.
>
> I'm ju
Pffft. That guy is a tool. His main job is to spout off rhetoric on
the international stage while trying not to embarrass the people really
in charge.
He does one of these well.
On 10/20/2011 10:51 AM, Ras Tafari wrote:
>
> meh.
>
> I'm just wondering who's next?
>
> Ahmadinejad! Down!
Fox News was saying that they hope that there is not chaos like when Saddam
was captured in Iraq. My response is simple, don't send us in to fix it,
there will be no chaos, lol.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http:
A. +1
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Ras Tafari wrote:
>
> and all i can do is read between the lines...
>
> [now we can get their oil cheaper, or maybe even control it if we play our
> cards right]
>
> and
>
> [look out mahmoud, you're next]
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Erika L
and all i can do is read between the lines...
[now we can get their oil cheaper, or maybe even control it if we play our
cards right]
and
[look out mahmoud, you're next]
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Erika L. Rich wrote:
>
> I guess this about sums it up (dont beat me up about the source
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:54 AM, GMoney wrote:
>
> I found that the news barely even drew a response from me when i read it
> this morning. Libya will probably be at least slightly better off in the
> future without that guybut who knows for sure.
What he ^ said..
--
Scott Stroz
---
I found that the news barely even drew a response from me when i read it
this morning. Libya will probably be at least slightly better off in the
future without that guybut who knows for sure.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Erika L. Rich wrote:
>
> What does that mean to people here? Is t
I guess this about sums it up (dont beat me up about the source, it's just
the first news article I clicked on):
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said her department was still
attempting to confirm the reports.
"[We] can't confirm Qaddafi's capture or death but if it's true, it's a big
si
meh.
I'm just wondering who's next?
Ahmadinejad! Down!
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Erika L. Rich wrote:
>
> What does that mean to people here? Is this going to help Libya? Should we
> celebrate?
>
>
>
~|
Order the Ad
16 matches
Mail list logo