> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 3:19 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Sunspots may be disappearing and that may have a climate
> effect
>
>
> Maybe not... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S
disappearing and that may have a climate
effect
Maybe not... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_storm
*crawls back into hole*
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael
Maybe not... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_storm
*crawls back into hole*
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
> I am not certain, but I think there is a pretty big difference between
> 'solar flares' and ' solar storms'.
>
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Vivec wrote:
>>
I am not certain, but I think there is a pretty big difference between
'solar flares' and ' solar storms'.
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
> Yeah ummm
> We already had this super huge solar flare recently.
> not much happened :-\
>
> On 15 September 2010 15:20, Casey Dougall
> w
Yeah ummm
We already had this super huge solar flare recently.
not much happened :-\
On 15 September 2010 15:20, Casey Dougall
wrote:
> Sun spots or not, we're still going to get solar storms, that's our #1
> problem right now since wer'e heading into a solar maximum.
>
> It would just take 1 b
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> We're currently coming out of a solar minimum (and the global temp
> kept rising in spite of what climate change deniers predicted) however
> recent evidence is showing that the solar minimum may be dropping to a
> point where sunspots ju
, September 15, 2010 1:32 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Sunspots may be disappearing and that may have a climate
> effect
>
>
> Yes that movie rated really high (um low) in terms of suck. Well
> within the canal water category.
>
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Wi
one doesn't exist. Or at the very least should never, ever, under
> any circumstances be spoken of.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 1:32 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Sunsp
y C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 1:32 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Sunspots may be disappearing and that may have a climate
effect
Yes that movie rated really high (um low) in terms of suck. Well
within the canal water category.
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010
Yes that movie rated really high (um low) in terms of suck. Well
within the canal water category.
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 2:27 PM, William Bowen wrote:
>
> Alas, that was the *only* thing that worked in Highlander 2...
>
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:54 AM, morgan l wrote:
>>
>> Maybe we should
Alas, that was the *only* thing that worked in Highlander 2...
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:54 AM, morgan l wrote:
>
> Maybe we should just build the shield? Worked in Highlander 2.
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
Maybe we should just build the shield? Worked in Highlander 2.
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
> So...to head off the ice age we can easily fill our atmosphere with
> more muck to keep temperatures up eh? :-)
>
> On 15 September 2010 13:49, Judah McAuley wrote:
> >
> >
> > Int
So...to head off the ice age we can easily fill our atmosphere with
more muck to keep temperatures up eh? :-)
On 15 September 2010 13:49, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
>
> Interesting stuff:
> http://ksjtracker.mit.edu/2010/09/15/aaas-sciencenow-the-way-things-are-going-sunspots-will-disappear-in-five-
13 matches
Mail list logo
