RE: This is for Gel

2006-04-03 Thread Ian Skinner
You don't think that a government with enough moxie to fake a plane crash could easily get rid of 70 people or 3000? Get rid of, yeah, but get rid of quietly without anybody taking notice or talking, not so much. Get rid of quietly without anybody taking notice or talking on a couple hours no

Re: This is for Gel

2006-04-01 Thread Robert Munn
hehe, wink wink, nod nod On 4/1/06, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Funny how few actual conspiracies exist in the world. > > Yes, precisely what _they_ want you to think! > > o_0 > > 6_6 > > ^_^ > > -- > will > > -- --- Robert Munn www.funkymojo.com ~

Re: This is for Gel

2006-04-01 Thread William Bowen
> Funny how few actual conspiracies exist in the world. Yes, precisely what _they_ want you to think! o_0 6_6 ^_^ -- will "If my life weren't funny, it would just be true; and that would just be unacceptable." - Carrie Fisher ~~

Re: This is for Gel

2006-04-01 Thread Robert Munn
There is always some paranoid moron with a big voice screaming about conspiracy. Funny how few actual conspiracies exist in the world. On 4/1/06, Maureen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You don't think that a goverment with enough moxie to fake a plane > crash could easily get rid of 70 people? o

Re: This is for Gel

2006-04-01 Thread Maureen
You don't think that a goverment with enough moxie to fake a plane crash could easily get rid of 70 people? or 3000? I don't believe any of the conspiracy stuff about 9/11 because I don't think the current administration could organize a piss-off in a brewery. So if anything fishy happened on 9/

Re: This is for Gel

2006-03-29 Thread G
Ahyer a scientologist! > No no no.. > > I never thought it wasn't a plane that hit the pentagon. > What I said was that the hijackers were aliens from Zamblefrot, and > this was all the precursor to an invasion. To get us fighting > ourselves so when the battle fleet arrives we will be in dis

RE: This is for Gel

2006-03-29 Thread Ian Skinner
> > I think it's poppycock and the fact that a plane did fly into the > > pentagon has been thoroughly explained. Yeah, the first thing that these theorists are going to have to explain is what happened to some 70+ people before I even attempt to listen to their "evidence." -- Ia

Re: This is for Gel

2006-03-29 Thread Vivec
-228-8372 > C: 703-300-3911 > -Original Message- > From: Zaphod Beeblebrox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 11:00 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: This is for Gel > > I thought you had subscribed to that line of thought at one time. If

RE: This is for Gel

2006-03-29 Thread Loathe
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 11:00 AM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: This is for Gel I thought you had subscribed to that line of thought at one time. If not, sorry! :) On 3/28/06, Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What does this have to do with me? > >

Re: This is for Gel

2006-03-28 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
I thought you had subscribed to that line of thought at one time. If not, sorry! :) On 3/28/06, Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What does this have to do with me? > > I think it's poppycock and the fact that a plane did fly into the > pentagon has been thoroughly explained. > > A lot of th

Re: This is for Gel

2006-03-28 Thread Ben Doom
And the follow-up: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/03/27/tuttle_email/?CentOS --Ben Kevin Graeme wrote: > Oklahoma city threatens to call FBI over 'renegade' Linux maker > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/03/24/tuttle_centos/ > > Good thing our civic leaders and lawmakers are on top of thing

Re: This is for Gel

2006-03-28 Thread Kevin Graeme
Oklahoma city threatens to call FBI over 'renegade' Linux maker http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/03/24/tuttle_centos/ Good thing our civic leaders and lawmakers are on top of things! On 3/28/06, Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't know why that was for Gel, but this looks like a fu

Re: This is for Gel

2006-03-28 Thread Vivec
What does this have to do with me? I think it's poppycock and the fact that a plane did fly into the pentagon has been thoroughly explained. A lot of their 'evidence' of a missile doesn't really hold up. On 3/28/06, Zaphod Beeblebrox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is for you Gel! > > http://

Re: This is for Gel

2006-03-28 Thread Kevin Graeme
I don't know why that was for Gel, but this looks like a fun place to post dumb stuff. http://www.devilducky.com/media/43729/ On 3/28/06, Zaphod Beeblebrox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is for you Gel! > > http://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk/flash.htm#Main > > > -- > And I've become a rolling sto