Wayne,
First of all, apology accepted. Secondly, I can completely understand
why you thought that. It's easy to misinterpret sarcasm. Sarcasm REALLY
requires the listener to hear the inflection of ones voice in order to
differentiate
it from seriousness. I speak in s much sarcasm in the re
This has been bugging me overnight, why did I get it so wrong - I
completely missed the "tone" of the post.
The only thing I can think of is that there have been so many posts to
the list recently (from a small but vocal number of posters) which
have a "kill em all" attitude that I have come to ta
Fair enough, misunderstanding.
On 2/23/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> first of fucking all i was being facetious.
>
> "Why stop at 27" was a fucking joke. I dont approve of "one" let
> alone twenty fucking seven. Man c'mon.
>
> no matter what you see on fucking tv, we dont go out and shoo
first of fucking all i was being facetious.
"Why stop at 27" was a fucking joke. I dont approve of "one" let
alone twenty fucking seven. Man c'mon.
no matter what you see on fucking tv, we dont go out and shoot guns in the air
and burn iraqi flags... sorry, we just dont.
i bet it would take me
You just don't get it do you.
On 2/23/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> oh hell yeah, exactly man, i dont know why i didnt say that same fucking
> thing.
>
> FUCK NO. not even close.
> and no, in the civilized world wayne, we dont do that.
>
> sorry to kill your odd sensationalism.
>
>
> On
oh hell yeah, exactly man, i dont know why i didnt say that same fucking thing.
FUCK NO. not even close.
and no, in the civilized world wayne, we dont do that.
sorry to kill your odd sensationalism.
On 2/23/06, Wayne Putterill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/22/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
On 2/22/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> so.
>
> Gunmen strike 27 Baghdad mosques, kill imams
>
> Great day in Baghdad. Why stop at 27 though?
Is this the American equivalent to running into the street and
shooting guns in the air? I just wondered if you were burning an Iraqi
flag while typi
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/02/23/wirq23.xml&sSheet=/portal/2006/02/23/ixportaltop.html
and so it begins...
Dana
>so.
>
>Gunmen strike 27 Baghdad mosques, kill imams
>
>Great day in Baghdad. Why stop at 27 though?
>
>There could be a sportsbook in the UK or somewhe
I'll agree that the situation is quite unclear, and likely to become ugly. And
we have stuck our troops into this. Jaysus.
> The situation is totally opaque to us. Who really bombed the Golden
> Dome? Was it Sunnis? Al Qaeda? Syrians? Iranian agents? They
> apparently have some guys in custody,
?
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Munn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 6:27 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: WOW! 27 of 'em
>
> The situation is totally opaque to us. Who really bombed the
> Golden Dome? Was it Sunni
The situation is totally opaque to us. Who really bombed the Golden Dome? Was
it Sunnis? Al Qaeda? Syrians? Iranian agents? They apparently have some guys in
custody, but who knows if they are the guys who carried out the original
bombing. It doesn't make sense for the Sunnis to have done it, be
> Weegs wrote:
> Gunmen strike 27 Baghdad mosques, kill imams
> Great day in Baghdad. Why stop at 27 though?
>
The more mosques you attack, the more mosques people will expect you
to attack. You have to set the bar a little low so you can out-do
yourself the next time.
~
12 matches
Mail list logo
