Talk about irony.
Judah you need to dial it up a bit if you want to talk with adults.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 11:11 PM, Judah McAuley
> He said he opposes the change to the organizing rules. He did not call
> Union organizers "thugs" which is what I took you to task for. That
> was stupid and you
>I hate unions more than any other institution man has created.
>
>I have _never_ seen anything but evil, greed, and sloth come from unions.
Yes definately evil stuff like the 40 hour weekpensions, health insurance,
occupational safety laws, anti-discrimination laws and regulations. Hell even
th
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
> That is already being done. Wow, you like something Bush did!
Don't be a dick. :) Judah already praised Bush where a pure hater
wouldn't-- please don't put him in that box you've got there.
Not everyone is all polarized like you 'n me,
>
> It is undemocratic and horrible, but don't take my word for it, here is
> Democratic hero and working class champion George McGovern talking about it:
He said he opposes the change to the organizing rules. He did not call
Union organizers "thugs" which is what I took you to task for. That
was
> RoMunn wrote:
> Here is what you are voting for:
>
Mmm, I think it's closer - no exactly - what David Brooks describes:
--
He doesn't have F.D.R.'s joyful nature or Reagan's happy outlook, but
he is analytical. That's why this William Ayers business doesn't
stick. He may be liberal, but he is n
I can speak for myself, thank you. I subscribe to the notion of care and
consideration in changing the law.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 7:42 PM, Dana wrote:
> he is familar but suscibes to the talking point that you can't just
> have people suing over stuff like that. Bad for bidness as Molly Ivins
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Judah wrote:
>
> > So the thugs from the local union office can come to everyone houses and
> > tell them to sign the union card "or else"? And if you don't think that
> is
> > exactly what is going to happen, you are fooling yourself.
>
> "Thugs"? Thugs? Bite me.
he is familar but suscibes to the talking point that you can't just
have people suing over stuff like that. Bad for bidness as Molly Ivins
used to say.
> Are you familiar with the Supreme Court case that brought this up? The
> case in question was where a women didn't find out for some years on
>
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 6:51 PM, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Union card check
>
>
> So the thugs from the local union office can come to everyone houses and
> tell them to sign the union card "or else"? And if you don't think that is
> exactly what is going to happen, you are fooling
I actually agree that unions played an important role in the creation of
basic workers' rights in the early 20th century, but they overplayed their
hand badly and have left once great American giants like General Motors
fetid corpses.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 6:44 PM, Jerry wrote:
> I hate unions
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Judah wrote:
> Union card check
So the thugs from the local union office can come to everyone houses and
tell them to sign the union card "or else"? And if you don't think that is
exactly what is going to happen, you are fooling yourself.
Card check is total
I hate unions more than any other institution man has created.
I have _never_ seen anything but evil, greed, and sloth come from unions.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Judah McAuley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got nothing particularly for or against trial lawyers. Unions are
> great tho
>That's exactly what I'm voting for, yeah.
>
>Prescript drug price controls
Better that than the current multi-billion giveaway to big pharma that the
shrubbery and its lapdog congress enacted.
>Union card check
>Representation for District of Columbia
Do you believe in representation in congre
I've got nothing particularly for or against trial lawyers. Unions are
great though. Some of the implementations of unions can be less than
what I'd hope for, but like democracy, I think they are a
fundamentally good idea and we just need to work to make them the best
we can.
Judah
On Sat, Oct 18
Yeah!!! Right on!
Lets benefit the Trial Lawyers and Union Bosses, because they really have
your best interests at heart.
-Original Message-
From: Maureen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2008 3:25 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: WSJ - the coming liberal
Good. Now maybe some real work will get done, benefiting the people
and not just Shrub, Cheney and their cronies and minions.
About damn time.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 6:30 AM, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is what you are voting for:
>
> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1224202058
sssh. Remain calm and await the Men In Black.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Judah McAuley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's exactly what I'm voting for, yeah.
>
> Prescript drug price controls
> Union card check
> Representation for District of Columbia
> Renegotiate mortgages in bankruptcy
>
That's exactly what I'm voting for, yeah.
Prescript drug price controls
Union card check
Representation for District of Columbia
Renegotiate mortgages in bankruptcy
Eliminate statute of limitations on workplace discrimination suits
(though this is really a radical way of putting it)
Bar funding fo
Thank god the Republicans aren't leaving them with much-- they'll be
lucky to balance the budget again.
:-)
--
The man who has no inner-life is a slave to his surroundings.
Henri Frederic Amiel
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 7:30 AM, Robert Munn wrote:
> Here is what you are voting for:
>
> http://onl
19 matches
Mail list logo
