He corrected himself. Employers cannot ask woman for medical records at will.
.
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> This is a good explanation, thanks for keeping me from needing to dig into
> this. I trust you for the particulars. I'd like to add as a female that
> there is no way
another graceful acknowledgement.
And by the way, I agree with you about the tactic; one of the things I work
on a little when I get time is transparency in government and yeah, this
very much isn't
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 8:22 AM, C. Hatton Humphrey wrote:
>
> Woah, that's not an amendment
012 7:54 AM
> > To: cf-community
> > Subject: Re: What was that about no one trying to stop women from using
> > birth control?
> >
> >
> > Because AZ is an at-will work state, you can be fired at any time for any
> > reason.
> >
> > Wearing bl
This is a good explanation, thanks for keeping me from needing to dig into
this. I trust you for the particulars. I'd like to add as a female that
there is no way in hell I'd go through this now, even as an older woman
who's pretty much comfortable in my own skin, and when I was 20 I literally
wou
Yes it does allow that Sam...
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 10:05 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: What was that about no one trying to stop women from using
birth control?
So we agree, the law doesn't allow the employ
Its a wonderful tactic (forgot the sarcasm tags) that's been used for
a long time by both sides. A few years ago something similar was used
to try and sneak through ID education into the classroom.
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:22 AM, C. Hatton Humphrey
wrote:
>
> Woah, that's not an amendment, tha
Woah, that's not an amendment, that's a whole new friggin bill!
In my initial search I didn't see the amended version... talk about playing
a game of smoke and mirrors! They took a piece of legislation that had
made it partially through the process and ran a "Strike Everything"
amendment and add
So we agree, the law doesn't allow the employer to ask all woman for
medical records and then fire them if they bought contraceptives?
Now that that part is clear. You have an issue with an insurance
company asking for proof that money they give you is being used for
medical purposes?
While I ag
d, Mar 14, 2012 at 8:30 AM, Eric Roberts <
> ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > So what was that G?
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jerry Milo Johnson [mailto:jmi...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 7:54 AM
> > To: cf-co
hreeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > So what was that G?
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jerry Milo Johnson [mailto:jmi...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 7:54 AM
> > To: cf-community
> > Subject: Re: What was th
http://e-lobbyist.com/gaits/text/596074
A CORPORATION, EMPLOYER, SPONSOR, ISSUER OR OTHER ENTITY OFFERING THE
PLAN MAY STATE RELIGIOUS BELIEFS OR MORAL CONVICTIONS IN ITS AFFIDAVIT
THAT REQUIRE THE SUBSCRIBER TO FIRST PAY FOR THE PRESCRIPTION AND THEN
SUBMIT A CLAIM TO THE CORPORATION ALONG WITH
n [mailto:jmi...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 7:54 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: What was that about no one trying to stop women from using
> birth control?
>
>
> Because AZ is an at-will work state, you can be fired at any time for any
> reason.
>
>
So what was that G?
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Milo Johnson [mailto:jmi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 7:54 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: What was that about no one trying to stop women from using
birth control?
Because AZ is an at-will work state, you can be
Because AZ is an at-will work state, you can be fired at any time for any
reason.
Wearing blue today? Fired. Don't like Tim Tebow? Fired.
Don't want to give your medical records to your employer? This is normally
covered under other employment laws as a no-no for employers, a "you can't
go there
H2625 had a title change on 3/1 from
DOMESTIC RELATIONS; DISPOSITION OF PROPERTY
to
INSURERS; HEALTHCARE COVERAGE; RELIGIOUS BELIEFS
mainly due to the massive change in focus from ammendment #4443
which was adopted, and finally presented as the house engrossed bill.
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at
*
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 6:51 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: What was that about no one trying to stop women from using
> birth control?
>
>
> Wow, what a way to play fast with facts
er of
electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> *shaking head*
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 6:51 PM
> To
*shaking head*
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 6:51 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: What was that about no one trying to stop women from using
birth control?
Wow, what a way to play fast with facts.
The law actually states an
Wow, what a way to play fast with facts.
The law actually states an employer doesn't have to PAY for
contraceptives unless you can prove they are for medical reasons.
How you got "... give an employer the right to
fire a woman that uses birth control." is beyond bizarre.
Luckily most people are
Truly amazing.
Nehemiah Scudder would be thrilled.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> They aren't trying to stop women from using birth control, they just
> want women to be able to fired from their jobs if they are using birth
> control. Duh.
>
>
~
They aren't trying to stop women from using birth control, they just
want women to be able to fired from their jobs if they are using birth
control. Duh.
Judah
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> Here's a propsed law in Arizona that would give an employer the right to
> fir
21 matches
Mail list logo
