Re: cfqueryparam

2006-01-19 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Jillian Koskie wrote: > As a test I ran a few of my more sustantial SQL commands with and > without cfqueryparam and it was faster without. How many repetitions? How does the parsing, planning and execution time break down? Jochem ~~~

Re: cfqueryparam

2006-01-18 Thread Michael Dinowitz
Counts on the code. Passing a list in should be slower. A date should be faster. > As a test I ran a few of my more sustantial SQL commands with and without > cfqueryparam and it was faster without. > > I thought it was supposed to be faster WITH it? > > ~~

RE: cfqueryparam

2006-01-18 Thread Ian Skinner
Usually, but not always. Most of us use it for It's security and defense against sql injection attack. The speed improvement is sometimes a small bonus. -- Ian Skinner Web Programmer BloodSource www.BloodSource.org Sacramento, CA ┌─┬─┐ │1│ │ ├─┼─┤ │ │