Bill Wheatley wrote:
> AHh don't get me started on blacklists
Why not? I would be interested in knowing what you think about for instance the blacklist that is being run by HoF: http://www.houseoffusion.com/spam/bannedips.cfm
Jochem
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsu
Kevin Graeme wrote:
> It's pretty much unmonitored here on the big cable broadband providers,
> IIRC.
Then it is quite likely that the customers of these providers will not be able to email me without using the SMTP relays of their ISPs.
Jochem
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
nning that is open.
William Wheatley
Coldfusion Guru
Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Graeme
To: CF-Community
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 5:13 PM
Subject: Re: evolution of vi
It's pretty much unmonitored here on the big cable broadband providers, IIRC.
-Kevin
On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 16:37:51 -0400, Jochem van Dieten
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Harkins, Patrick wrote:
> > Do major ISPs monitor for spam-like email volume or other suspicious
> > traffic from residential cus
Harkins, Patrick wrote:
> Do major ISPs monitor for spam-like email volume or other suspicious
> traffic from residential customers? And do they do anything about it?
I don't know how it works on your side of the pond, but here some of the major ISPs do that. Others find themselves massively black
Do major ISPs monitor for spam-like email volume or other suspicious traffic
from residential customers? And do they do anything about it?
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten
They are already responsible. That is why some RBLs list ISPs instead of
hosts and others tie not just the
Patrick Harkins wrote:
> But the ISP would have to actually care about incidents...
If your ISP doesn't care about incidents, you have the wrong ISP.
> As I
> understand the suggestion, it is to make ISPs responsible for outgoing
> "bad traffic", in order to stem the flow and keep networks aliv
The problem that they are talking about is not so much single machine
infection but the clogging of Internet traffic by spam/virus bot networks
and multiplying error messages related to forged headers and multiple bounce
backs, etc
-Original Message-
From: Robert Munn
> There is an in
But the ISP would have to actually care about incidents... As I understand the suggestion, it is to make ISPs responsible for outgoing "bad traffic", in order to stem the flow and keep networks alive...acknowledging that education of the end-user is a slow and painful process.
>
>
> I don't see t
Patrick Harkins wrote:
> There is an interesting article and discussion on this topic at this
> address:
> http://reviews-zdnet.com.com/4520-7297-5148132.html
> I was wondering what you guys thought of the comment one of the guys
> made about the need to force ISPs block outgoing spam/virus traff
> There is an interesting article and discussion on this topic at this
> address:
> http://reviews-zdnet.com.com/4520-7297-5148132.html
> I was wondering what you guys thought of the comment one of the guys
> made about the need to force ISPs block outgoing spam/virus traffic...
Personally I wou
11 matches
Mail list logo
