> I really do think you're proving my point though. If the school
> district was busing students to a rally to watch the Obama speech, I
> bet you'd be calling foul.
Not if it required a permission slip to attend and was open to all
beyond just the students
~
actually, I got it from the local reporting. They interviewed a
couple of churches in the area that opened up to show the speech since
district did not provide any places.
I don't understand why the buses can be considered a moot point? The
fact that they are running indicates support for
> Did the school district provide transportation to the Obama speech?
> Did they provide a place inside the school where kids could opt-in to
> the speech? Was there anywhere in the district that had a school
> sponsored location of the speech?
Do you know that for proof positive or are you pull
and the event that all the conservatives were up in arms about had
more to do with education than football and politics together.
C'mon Hatton, I want to hear some outrage! They're using school funds
to bus these kids to an event with a political figure chairing it.
Did the school district
> it just reeks of hypocrisy.
>
> if anything since the school district did not allow the students to
> view the current president's speech. Why should the district pay to
> see the former president speak when it refused to allow the current
> one to speak for free.
Actually, they're not being hy
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <
zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Summary: A local school district didn't show the speech on campus, but
> next month they're busing 28 5th grade classes to the Cowboy's Stadium
> where GWB will be speaking at a youth education program.
>
Of course not. In their eyes he's a real president, not like
the current faker.
It just reeks of hypocrisy.
if anything since the school district did not allow the students to
view the current president's speech. Why should the district pay to
see the former president speak when it refused to al
