Re: Re:Madonna for Wes Clark

2004-01-09 Thread Kevin Graeme
AIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 9:07 AM Subject: RE: Re:Madonna for Wes Clark > Look, if you're not voting Clark this time around, do the sensible thing > and be part of the loyal opposition. > > Write in '

RE: Re:Madonna for Wes Clark

2004-01-09 Thread Haggerty, Mike
Message- From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 10:02 AM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: Re:Madonna for Wes Clark Yeah, I know. But still I think it might be wise to hedge my bets and run a monkey this time. Or at least a lemur. -Kevin [Todays Threads] [This

Re: Re:Madonna for Wes Clark

2004-01-09 Thread Kevin Graeme
L PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 5:06 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Re:Madonna for Wes Clark > > > I hope you're right considering that the concensus right now is that > none of > the candidates can win against Bush. > > During the 2000 elections, I

RE: Re:Madonna for Wes Clark

2004-01-09 Thread Haggerty, Mike
Bill Clinton's chances of beating Sr. were put at about 4% going into the _nominations_. Things change rapidly in a presidential year. M -Original Message- From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 5:06 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: Re:Madonn

Re:Madonna for Wes Clark

2004-01-08 Thread Ben Braver
>but I was proven wrong. > >-Kevin > > >- Original Message - >From: "Jerry Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 4:02 PM >Subject: Re:Madonna for Wes Clark > >

Re:Madonna for Wes Clark

2004-01-08 Thread Ben Braver
Clark rejected being Dean's veep. Didn't hear Clark reject Dean being his veep! ;-) -Ben >Sounds good, but Clark was asked and rejected teaming up with Dean >: >: >: How about a Dean and Clark candidacy. They each have strengths that >: bolster the other's weaknesses - foreign policy on Clark'

Re: Re:Madonna for Wes Clark

2004-01-08 Thread Kevin Graeme
AIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 4:02 PM Subject: Re:Madonna for Wes Clark > Quite the opposite, I think. > > Remember, they are NEVER right. > > They seem to have an even-worse-than-a-weatherman chanc

Re:Madonna for Wes Clark

2004-01-08 Thread Jerry Johnson
Quite the opposite, I think. Remember, they are NEVER right. They seem to have an even-worse-than-a-weatherman chance of predicting anything, even after it has happened. =) Jerry Johnson >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/08/04 03:57PM >>> It is awfully early in the process for people to be deciding the

Re: Re:Madonna for Wes Clark

2004-01-08 Thread Matthew Small
  Subject: Re:Madonna for Wes Clark   It is awfully early in the process for people to be deciding the winner already. Methinks the media prognostications have a danger of becoming self-fulfilling. .   -Ben   > I belong to the Clark for Pres mailing list.  I like him ok, but I'm   > begin

Re:Madonna for Wes Clark

2004-01-08 Thread Ben Braver
It is awfully early in the process for people to be deciding the winner already. Methinks the media prognostications have a danger of becoming self-fulfilling. . -Ben > I belong to the Clark for Pres mailing list.  I like him ok, but I'm > beginning to feel like his campaign is faltering.  Dean s