/Developer
> ow...@threeravensconsulting.com
> tel: 630-486-5255
> fax: 630-310-8531
> http://www.threeravensconsulting.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2
Romney is shrewder and probably overall smarter than Bush, but he has a lot
of the same handlers and advisers. Romney is crooked, Bush was just
incompetent. Karl Rove is the brains behind both, so if Romney is elected,
expect to see the same policies and the same people benefiting from him
being
g.com
-Original Message-
From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 9:12 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Romney Tax Plan
So you tell me, what do these words mean?
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constit
se.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Three Ravens Consulting
>>>> Eric Roberts
>>>> Owner/Developer
>>>> ow...@threeravensconsulting.com
>>>> tel: 630-486-5255
>>>> fax: 630-310-8531
>
;> tel: 630-486-5255
>>> fax: 630-310-8531
>>> http://www.threeravensconsulting.com
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Friday,
Original Message-
>> From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 1:25 PM
>> To: cf-community
>> Subject: RE: Romney Tax Plan
>>
>>
>> Seriously, would you like me to link the relevent articles and clauses?
>> On
10-8531
> http://www.threeravensconsulting.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 1:25 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: RE: Romney Tax Plan
>
>
> Seriously, would you lik
-Original Message-
From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 1:25 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: RE: Romney Tax Plan
Seriously, would you like me to link the relevent articles and clauses?
On Oct 19, 2012 2:22 PM, "LRS Scout" wrote:
> No, we sho
I was 12 when Carter left office. I will have to defer to those who are
older and/or smarter than I to make that analogy.
On Oct 19, 2012 9:13 PM, "Jerry Barnes" wrote:
>
> "I don't think it is a fair assessment to say that Gov. Romney's policies
> are similar to Pres. Bush."
>
> It's perfectly
"I don't think it is a fair assessment to say that Gov. Romney's policies
are similar to Pres. Bush."
It's perfectly fair if it is allowed to say President Obama's policies are
similar to President Carter.
J
-
In the spirit of Sesame Street, the presidents remarks tonight are
brought you by
g.com
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 10:14 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Romney Tax Plan
Now you can use your simple math.
Cut spending by 5t cut taxes by 5t.
.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Maureen wrote:
>
>
---
>> Three Ravens Consulting
>> Eric Roberts
>> Owner/Developer
>> ow...@threeravensconsulting.com
>> tel: 630-486-5255
>> fax: 630-310-8531
>> http://www.threeravensconsulting.com
>>
>>
>> -Original Message
Ravens Consulting
> Eric Roberts
> Owner/Developer
> ow...@threeravensconsulting.com
> tel: 630-486-5255
> fax: 630-310-8531
> http://www.threeravensconsulting.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@g
From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 9:52 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Romney Tax Plan
No one wants to hear it but as a nation we are bankrupt, morally,
intellectually and fiscally.
With out major across the board cuts how are we going to pay the interest
much
And I said that is not the case.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Sam wrote:
>
>>> I don't think it would be so much an 'insult' as it would be a
>>> mis-categorization - wither way, i think its worth noting the
>>> discrepancy.
>>
>> Wh
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Sam wrote:
>> I don't think it would be so much an 'insult' as it would be a
>> mis-categorization - wither way, i think its worth noting the
>> discrepancy.
>
> Why care about the category?
I guess I shouldn't, I agree. But it guess it bothers me a little
becau
I don't think it is a fair assessment to say that Gov. Romney's
policies are similar to Pres. Bush.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Melvin Thompson wrote:
>
> What everyone fail to realize.. No matter who became president back in 2008,
> the economic downturn had to complete it's course of wha
. I don't understand why people and the President thought the economy and jobs
could be turned around in less than 3 years, because the 1st year of Pres Obama
term, Bush policies were still in place.. That's just how it is for a 1st term
President taking over.. I don't think Pres Obama knew how
What everyone fail to realize.. No matter who became president back in 2008,
the economic downturn had to complete it's course of what Bush created.. You
have to ask yourself, do you want to continue with the similar policies during
Bush terms, by voting for Romney, or do you want the economy a
Why are all people ignoring the fact that Romney has been caught changing his
position in many topics depending on who's his audience.. If he lies so easily
just to try and become president and his campaign managers do their best to
correct what he says, by saying he didn't really mean that...
What everyone fail to realize.. No matter who became president back in 2008,
the economic downturn had to complete it's course of what Bush created.. You
have to ask yourself, do you want to continue with the similar policies during
Bush terms, by voting for Romney, or do you want the economy a
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
> So, someone's political ideology is solely based on who they voted for
> in the last presidential election or who they are leaning towards in
> an upcoming presidential election? That's ridiculous.
Most of what you've been saying in the last
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> I've said many times very few are always to the right or always to the
> left. We're talking about presidents and their policies. In that sense
> and the sense only you are no considered a lefty. It might even be
> temporary but you shouldn't be of
We're back to simple math? The tax cuts are paid for. Now you're just
being evasive.
.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> If you think pointing out that the candidates are using faulty math to
> support their assertions is nonsense, feel free to ignore it.
>
> I'll just sit he
I don't get your point. Obama raised the debt more in one year than
Reagan did in eight and Reagan had one of the most prosperous
economies ever for the US.
.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> Reagan grew the debt 300% and the govt 7% per year.
> Bush 1 grew the debt b
If you think pointing out that the candidates are using faulty math to
support their assertions is nonsense, feel free to ignore it.
I'll just sit here and laugh at your discomfort when taxes and spending
both increase and push the deficit even higher. Which will happen
regardless of who wins th
Given that the US was just supplying the bombs and missiles, the arms
companies shouldn't be too upset. They still get paid and the NATO
allies had to replenish their stocks. So its a win for them.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, the intervention model is much
So you were just talking nonsense? I wish I knew, I would have just ignored it.
.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Maureen wrote:
>
> i was never discussing paying for tax cuts. I was pointing out that the
> plan to reduce tax rates by 20% would cost more money than it would
> generate even i
Unfortunately, the intervention model is much less profitable for the
weapons manufacturers which is why you hear their shills already calling
for us to start yet another war.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> I have no problems with that. The Libyan intervention model i
I have no problems with that. The Libyan intervention model is much
better for the US than the model used in Afghanistan or Iraq.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:23 AM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> This, Larry, this :)
>
> As Scott said, there is no magic bullet, althogh I will say, moving from an
> interven
Reagan grew the debt 300% and the govt 7% per year.
Bush 1 grew the debt by 50% and the govt by 5% per year
Clinton: 30% debt growth, govt 3% per year
Bush II, 80% debt growth, govt 6% per year
Obama, 33% debt growth and govt grew 1.4% per year.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Sam wrote:
>
>
I often joke (well..it's mostly joking) that we should pull recall all
our soldiers, close the borders and hand a sign on the door that says,
"We will get back to you when we get our own shit together"
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:23 AM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> This, Larry, this :)
>
> As Scott said,
i was never discussing paying for tax cuts. I was pointing out that the
plan to reduce tax rates by 20% would cost more money than it would
generate even if all deductions were removed and all loopholes were closed
so it did not matter which deductions Romney kept so demanding details of
his plan
Did we change the scope of this discussion to pay for other things or
are we still just discussing simple math about paying for tax cuts?
If we're to move on, we can make more cuts, repeal Obamacare, more tax
revenue from an improved economy etc.
.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Maureen wr
Assuming that was possible, it would equal zero and would leave no money to
pay down the debt or reduce the deficit.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> Now you can use your simple math.
> Cut spending by 5t cut taxes by 5t.
>
> .On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Maureen wrote:
> >
Now you can use your simple math.
Cut spending by 5t cut taxes by 5t.
.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Not if he reduces the tax revenue.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com
If you have to cut, I"d like to see cuts made on such things as
government subsidies to corporations and most agricultural subsidies.
Oil and coal subsidies should also be cut.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Maureen wrote:
>
> You make some good points, but if you look at total budget expendi
Not if he reduces the tax revenue.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Sam wrote:.
>
>
> If Romney returns spending to 2008 levels at the least that's your $5
> trillion (*10years) tax cut paid for. Everything else is gravy. If he
> cut's it more, let us pray he does, then even better. Add to that
You make some good points, but if you look at total budget expenditures,
defense, interest on debt, medicare and social security dwarf all others.
I'm all for spending cuts, but Romney can no more balance the budget by
cutting the small programs and increasing the large ones than you could
balanc
What he said at the debate was a cap where you can pick and choose
what deductions you want. I guess that's why I don't get why you want
individual promises when all are covered.
.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> I get that Jerry, and I really was not looking for him to
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
> I have never made claims that I am 'wiser' than those taking sides. As
> a matter of fact, I often say that you guys are smarter than I on a
> lot of issues (hell, I would say maybe even most). One reason I use
> this list is to help gather mo
I see you won't read the article and will just shout simple math.
Let's try this:
2007$161 Billion Deficit
2008$459 Billion Deficit
2009$1413 Billion Deficit
2010$1294 Billion Deficit
2011$1299 Billion Deficit
2012$1100 Billion Deficit
If Romney returns spending to 2008
This, Larry, this :)
As Scott said, there is no magic bullet, althogh I will say, moving from an
interventionist force to a defensive one would be an excellent start.
On Oct 19, 2012 10:07 AM, "Larry C. Lyons" wrote:
>
> My issue with both sides is that whenever they discuss cuts, its more
> in
My issue with both sides is that whenever they discuss cuts, its more
in context of social engineering. For instance a democratic party rep
will talk about oil subsidies, but neglect farm subsidies. Similarly a
republican will discuss cutting back on social programs, but increase
taxes on the very
My wife and I have spent the last year trying to get ourselves out of
debt. The first thing we realized is that just cutting spending or
just increasing revenue was not going to be enough to get the job done
effectively. We needed to cut our spending AND increase revenue -
which has been working q
"No one wants to hear it but as a nation we are bankrupt, morally,
intellectually
and fiscally."
Unfortunately, this is spot on.
And all three items are deeply intwined together. If people were more
intellectually aware, they would not accept the fiscal chicanery going on.
If our citizens were
I get that Jerry, and I really was not looking for him to say 'Middle
income families will not lose their mortgage deduction..ever'
I would prefer something along the lines of, "My plan will allow
Congress to determine what deductions will be lowered, but I am going
to fight to make sure that the
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>>
>> I hope you can see the hypocrisy in that statement. In all my time in this
>> list I cannot recall a single instance where you criticized republicans
>> and/or supported democrats.
>
> I don
Flunked arithmetic and logic, didn't you?
Let's try it in programming, since you purport to understand that.
The amount of money to pay for all government spending will be less and it
does not matter which deductions Romney will cut.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Then your
No one wants to hear it but as a nation we are bankrupt, morally,
intellectually and fiscally.
With out major across the board cuts how are we going to pay the interest
much less bring down our debt?
Oh hey, I have an idea, how about we cut everything not mentioned
specifically in the constituio
"Tell me what Obama's plan is to create jobs and balance the budget."
He wants to raise taxes on the top 2%. That'll do it, right?
Well if he raises it to 100% on the top 2% of earners, there will still be
a huge deficit, so he must have something else up his sleeve.
Maybe he has a plan to sti
"Everyone seems to be super concerned with the minutia of Romney's tax plan
as if it would make or break the election when it is nothing but minor
details of his plan as president. Yet nobody has asked how Obama plans to
cut the deficit in half even though he's tried four times and it's always
dou
"I cannot fathom why this concept is so difficult for two seemingly intelligent
guys like you and Sam to grasp."
There is nothing to fathom. You want something you are not going to get.
Neither candidate is going to give you the details you would like to have.
It's not how politics are played
The detail is it's going to be capped and this is the ballpark number.
Wow you are anal.
.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> So, you consider pulling a number out of thin air during a nationally
> televised debate 'details'?
>
> Noted.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> I hope you can see the hypocrisy in that statement. In all my time in this
> list I cannot recall a single instance where you criticized republicans
> and/or supported democrats.
I don't need to criticize the GOP because enough people here
Then your statement has no purpose here. Romney does not plan on
maintaining the same rate of spending. It's insane to think or imply
the current $ trillion a year deficit is the norm. The article
explains how to balance the tax cuts so they are cost neutral. It's
not as easy as a + b - c and to p
So, you consider pulling a number out of thin air during a nationally
televised debate 'details'?
Noted.
On Oct 18, 2012 3:51 PM, "Sam" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
> >
> > You mean the $25,000 'cap' he came up with on the fly during the
> > debate? He even ad
I hope you can see the hypocrisy in that statement. In all my time in this
list I cannot recall a single instance where you criticized republicans
and/or supported democrats.
If we are unable to see the awesomeness of Gov. Romney's plan because we
are biased against it, can the same not be said o
No, it's not the Romney plan. It doesn't matter what his plan is.
My statement was if you cut all the tax rates as he proposes, that even if
you cut ALL deductions, it would not make up the difference. And just as
point of non-bias, what Obama is touting, the whole tax the rich rhetoric,
also
Doesn't take you long to start the insults. I know, you weren't talking to me.
.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
>
> It's simply arithmetic. I learned it in elementary school. Remember word
> problems?
>
~|
It's the Romney plan.
You can't take a number and subtract another and say done. If only
life were so simple.
Read the article.
.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> I used figures from the Department of the Treasury. Are you calling them
> biased?
>
> And again, I was discus
You don't have to be either a tax expert or an economist to use these
formulas:
Income - deductions * rate = Tax Revenue
versus
Income * (rate - 20%) = Tax Revenue
It's simply arithmetic. I learned it in elementary school. Remember word
problems?
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Sam wrote:
I used figures from the Department of the Treasury. Are you calling them
biased?
And again, I was discussing Romney's tax plan. Linking to an admittedly
biased opinion of Obama's plan is nothing more than misdirection.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> It's out of my scope. I'
It's out of my scope. I'm not a tax expert or an economist. But if you
are going to use a biased report to defend your point of view then I
can do the same.
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/330812/obama-s-trillion-dollar-tax-cut-fraud-alan-reynolds
.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Maure
I see a lot of links to sites that spin the discussion, a lot accusations
of bias, finger pointing and name calling. I rarely see coherent
explanations. If you have some of those that come from non-biased sources
or your own research, why don't you post that instead.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:0
The claims are different as I never mentioned middle class taxes. I simply
gave the figures for all taxes collected. Don't trust my numbers if don't
want to. Just go to the Treasury dept statistics site and do the math
yourself. I'd rather do that than base my views on the opinion of some
jour
It's only three or four people here that have no respect for facts. No biggy.
Point is re-explaining myself a dozen times goes no place with them so
telling me to keep trying is silly. At some point I have to point and
say the obvious hoping eventually a light would go on.
.
On Thu, Oct 18, 20
If only it were that simple.
I feel like we're starting this thread over.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/check-math-romneys-tax-plan-doesnt-raise-middle-class-taxes_653485.html
.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Because it's not my math, it comes from the experts. Go
If you have such disrespect for the people on this list, why do you stay?
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Not on this list.
>
> .On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Maureen wrote:
> >
> > You would be more effect at presenting your point if you would actually
> > present that poi
Because it's not my math, it comes from the experts. Go to the Dept of
Treasury website, look at total gross tax, subtract 20%. Then look at the
figures for total deductions. That number will be less than the 20%. The
difference is what will need to be made up to achieve the same level of
coll
"Governor Romney's argument is, we're not fixed, so fire him and put
me in," said Clinton. "It is true we're not fixed. When President
Obama looked into the eyes of that man who said in the debate, I had
so much hope four years ago and I don't now, I thought he was going to
cry. Because he knows t
Not on this list.
.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> You would be more effect at presenting your point if you would actually
> present that point instead of spinning around yelling "bias, bias, liberal".
~|
Show us why you think your math is better than the experts?
.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> He could close all the loopholes, get rid of all the tax deductions and
> still not be able to generate enough tax revenue to offset a 20% across the
> board tax cut.
> Again...arit
When you only point out errors from one side it makes a very blatant
statement. Deny all you want but your not fooling anyone.
.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> I most certainly can point out the errors on one side without it being a
> defense of the other. Stating the Rom
You would be more effect at presenting your point if you would actually
present that point instead of spinning around yelling "bias, bias, liberal".
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> When you're done chasing the squirrel I'll explain.
>
> Ready?
>
> Scott's beating a dead horse s
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> You mean the $25,000 'cap' he came up with on the fly during the
> debate? He even admitted he made up the number.
Yes.
> His exact words were: "And so in terms of bringing down deductions,
> one way of doing that would be to say everybody
When you're done chasing the squirrel I'll explain.
Ready?
Scott's beating a dead horse so I just wanted to point out how
ridiculously biased he's being.
.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> the point remains, what does what Sam said have to do with anything
> you ment
They've also shown it top be possible. I guess you just need to pick
which ones you like.
.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> But neutral bipartisan think
> tanks have shown that with the increases in promised military spending
> and the across the board tax cuts, its i
He could close all the loopholes, get rid of all the tax deductions and
still not be able to generate enough tax revenue to offset a 20% across the
board tax cut.
Again...arithmetic.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> Remove loopholes, ge
I most certainly can point out the errors on one side without it being a
defense of the other. Stating the Romney's plan lacks specificity makes
no comment at all on Obama's plan.
That fact that you don't understand that is the reason you misinterpret the
majority of what I post.
On Thu, Oct 1
You mean the $25,000 'cap' he came up with on the fly during the
debate? He even admitted he made up the number.
His exact words were: "And so in terms of bringing down deductions,
one way of doing that would be to say everybody gets Ill pick a
number $25,000 in deductions and credits"
Pick
Let me try that again, typing too fast.
the point remains, what does what Sam said have to do with what you
mentioned? It was another LOOK! SQUIRREL! moment.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> the point remains, what does what Sam said have to do with anything
> you ment
the point remains, what does what Sam said have to do with anything
you mentioned? It was another LOOK! SQUIRREL! moment.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> You are correct...I did not. I was making a statement.
>
> That statement was that Gov. Romney's tax plan makes no sen
I suspect that he knows or realizes that if he showed exactly what
he'd cut, no one would vote for him. But neutral bipartisan think
tanks have shown that with the increases in promised military spending
and the across the board tax cuts, its impossible to pay for without
massively increasing the
That was his 2008 plan and we have the results.
Also, he's taking the money he's going to save from medicare and put
it in Obamacare. That money is already spent even if he doesn't find
it.
.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> Remove loopholes, get rid of tax reduction for
Capping the deductions for people making over $200k at $25k is a
detail. It's not in stone but might be what he's going to recommend.
As for Obama's plan, we all know how well that's worked. He's been
doing it for four years.
.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> You are co
You are correct...I did not. I was making a statement.
That statement was that Gov. Romney's tax plan makes no sense to me in
that it contains no details on how we can fund a 20% across the board
tax cut, other than 'lower deductions and close loopholes, but
Congress will decide which ones'.
I c
unity
Subject: Re: Romney Tax Plan
Tell me what Obama's plan is to create jobs and balance the budget.
.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> I don't know what he thinks...at all.that is the problem. He has
> not stated anything that he would fight for
He didn't ask a question.
.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> what has that to do with Scott's question? Its just a cheap attempt at
> distraction.
>
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Sam wrote:
>>
>> Tell me what Obama's plan is to create jobs and balance the budge
what has that to do with Scott's question? Its just a cheap attempt at
distraction.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Tell me what Obama's plan is to create jobs and balance the budget.
>
> .
>
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>>
>> I don't know what he thin
Former Obama economic advisor Steve Rattner on "Morning Joe" says that
growth under Obama is the slowest since the 1930's (October 18, 2012).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=a-oToiJdepM
.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Sam wrote:
> Tell me what Obama's plan is to crea
Tell me what Obama's plan is to create jobs and balance the budget.
.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> I don't know what he thinks...at all.that is the problem. He has
> not stated anything that he would fight for. He has not stated that
> there are deductions for th
I don't know what he thinks...at all.that is the problem. He has
not stated anything that he would fight for. He has not stated that
there are deductions for the middle class that he would fight to keep.
Ha has not stated there are deductions/loopholes for the wealthy he
would fight to lower/c
You know what he thinks, you now want rankings by priority. Those
rankings won't change anything. It's just a distraction.
.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> Gov. Romney has stated that he knows how to get the economy going
> again. He has stated a big part of his plan t
While I have stated that I am voting for Pres. Obama, I have not
stated that my mind could not be changed.
In an attempt to be an informed voter, I am asking questions that I
think should be asked.
I don't get the warm & fuzzies with Gov. Romney's 'trust me it will
work. We will let Congress fil
Gov. Romney has stated that he knows how to get the economy going
again. He has stated a big part of his plan to do this is his tax
plan. I do not think it is unfair to ask for at least some details of
that plan - hell I would settle for even a glimpse of what he thinks
should be changed for the '
Since everyone knows you're voting for Obama who has no plan except
what we know has failed, the only reason you're trying to get the
finer details is to knock Romney. It almost nothing to do with the
election. Once Obama is gone people will hire. Businesses are sitting
on $trillions waiting for
It's been proven repeatedly by Kennedy, Reagan and Bush.
Clinton's surplus went away because it was based on ten years of
projected earnings that disappeared with the dot-com bubble bursting.
SS money was borrowed with an IOU of future revenue that never
materialized.
But I like that you base you
You can't always attack one side and pretend your not doing it to
defend the other. That's like saying it depends on what the definition
of is is.
.
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> I didn't say anything at all about Obama's plan. I simply read Romney's
> and told you what
I was meaning to ask this, but was too busy at work.
Everyone seems to be super concerned with the minutia of Romney's tax
plan as if it would make or break the election when it is nothing but
minor details of his plan as president. Yet nobody has asked how Obama
plans to cut the deficit in half e
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
